Evaluasi Kinerja Pelayanan dan Tarif Sistem Angkutan Umum Berbasis Bus di Kota Semarang (Studi Kasus : Bus Trans Semarang Koridor I Rute Terminal Penggaron – Terminal Mangkang)
Abstract
Service quality and fares are very important parameters in the operation of the public transport system. BRT Trans Semarang is a bus-based public transportation system in Semarang city that is operated to overcome congestion and accommodate the movement of people in Semarang City. This study aims to evaluate the service performance and fares of BRT Trans Semarang and to determine the level of user satisfaction. The methods used in this study are observation, interviews, questionnaires and primary surveys. The data obtained is processed, analyzed and all indicators are evaluated referring to the Technical Guidelines for Organizing Public Transport in Urban Areas in the Fixed and Regular Routes of the Director General of Land Transportation 2002. The results show that: 1) overall the performance of BRT Trans Semarang services has met the standards , and there are 2 (two) indicators that doesn't meet the standards, are the average loading factor (utilization factor) and passenger waiting time; 2) Most passengers are satisfied with BRT Trans Semarang services; 3) The exixting fare applied is below the amount of the cost operation issued by the operator so it needs Government support (subsidies) to ensure BRT Trans Semarang can continue operate.
Downloads
References
De Borger B., B., Kerstens, K., & Costa, Á. (2002). Public transit performance: What does one learn from frontier studies? Transport Reviews, 22(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640010020313
Frans, J. H., Messah, Y. A., & Issu, N. T. (2016). Kajian Tarif Angkutan Umum Berdasarkan Biaya Operasional Kendaraan (BOK), Ability To Pay (ATP) dan Willingness To Pay (WTP) di Kabupaten TTS. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, V(2), 185–198.
Güner, S., & Coşkun, E. (2019). Estimating the operational and service efficiency of bus transit routes using a non-radial DEA approach. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 8(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13676-018-0123-1
Haghighi, N. N., Liu, X. C., Wei, R., Li, W., & Shao, H. (2018). Using Twitter data for transit performance assessment: a framework for evaluating transit riders’ opinions about quality of service. Public Transport, 10(2), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-018-0184-4
Hariani, M. L., Santoso, I., & Wibowo, S. S. (2020). Analisis Kebijakan Struktur Tarif dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Besaran Subsidi (Studi Kasus : TransJakarta). Jurnal Manajemen Aset Infrastruktur & Fasilitas, 4(3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.12962/j26151847.v4i3.7102
Indonesia, R. (2009). UU No.22 tahun 2009 Tentang Lalu Lintas dan ANgkutan Jalan. Retrieved from https://jdih.dephub.go.id/assets/uudocs/uu/uu_no.22_tahun_2009.pdf
Joewono, T. (2009). Exploring the Willingness and Ability to Pay for Paratransit in Bandung, Indonesia. Journal of Public Transportation, 12(2), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.12.2.5
Kumalawati, A., Hangge, E. E., & Raja, D. (2022). Analisis Kinerja Pelayanan Angkutan Umum Bud AKDP Antar Kota (Studi Kasus : Angkutan Umum Trayek Bajawa - Ende). JUTEKS - Jurnal Teknik Sipil, VII(I), 28–35.
Listiani, A. S., Farida, I., & Walujodjati, E. (2013). Evaluasi Tarif Angkutan Umum Berdasarkan Biaya Operasi Kendaraan (BOK) (Studi Trayek Cilawu - Garut Kota Kabupaten Garut). Jurnal Evaluasi Tarif Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Garut, 11(1).
Provinsi Jawa Tengah Dalam Angka 2022. (2022).
Sheth, C., Triantis, K., & Teodorović, D. (2007). Performance evaluation of bus routes: A provider and passenger perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43(4), 453–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.010
Shuai, W., & Zhengdong, H. (2019). Bus Load Factor Estimation Based on Transit Big Data : a Case Study of Shenzhen. Bulletin of Surveiing and Mapping.
Woldeamanuel, M. G., & Woldetensae, B. (2021). Riders’ Satisfaction with Public Transportation Performance: The Case of Addis Ababa Light Rail Transit (AALRT). Eastern Africa Social Science Research Review, 37(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1353/eas.2021.0003
