EVALUASI PERFORMANCE JARINGAN INTERNET KAMPUS MENGGUNAKAN QUALITY OF SERVICE (QOS)
Abstract
The University of Lancang Kuning (UNILAK) has internet facilities in all existing buildings. Internet facilities can be accessed by all campus academic community, students, staff, lecturers and all academic. Based on data obtained from the Puskom Division, currently, UNILAK has a bandwidth of 30 Mbps obtained from ISP WANXP Pekanbaru. Each campus UNILAK community has a user ID that can be used to access the Internet network throughout the building that has a WIFI network. But students, lecturers, and employees complained about the existing internet service, namely the slow internet access obtained. In this research, the research on the quality of internet network in the campus of University of Lancang Kuning (Unilak) by using QoS (Quality of Service) method based on a parameter of throughput, delay, jitter, and packet loss. The tool used to perform the measurement is the Wireshark app. Based on the result of the research that the average of throughput value in each location of measurement in medium condition, delay value got the average medium condition, jitter value got average good condition while packet loss value got a very good average. The conclusion is that network conditions at Lancang Kuning University during rush hour are sometimes stable and down. But at lonely hours the network conditions are in a stable state.
Keywords: QoS, Troughput, Delay, Jitter, Packet Loss
Abstrak
Universitas Lancang Kuning (UNILAK) memiliki fasilitas internet di semua gedung yang ada. Fasilitas internet dapat diakses oleh seluruh civitas akademik kampus baik mahasiswa, karyawan, dosen dan seluruh akademika yang ada. Berdasarkan data yang diperoleh dari Divisi Puskom, saat ini UNILAK memiliki bandwith 30 Mbps yang diperoleh dari ISP WANXP Pekanbaru. Setiap civitas kampus UNILAK memiliki ID pengguna yang dapat digunakan untuk mengakses jaringan internet diseluruh gedung yang memiliki jaringan WIFI. Namun mahasiswa, dosen maupun karyawan mengeluhkan terhadap layanan internet yang ada, yaitu lambatnya akses internet yang didapatkan. Pada penelitian ini dilakukan pengukuran kualitas jaringan internet di Kampus Universitas Lancang Kuning (UNILAK) dengan menggunakan metode QoS (Quality of Service) berdasarkan parameter throughput, delay, jitter dan packet loss. Tool yang digunakan untuk melakukan pengukuran adalah aplikasi wireshark. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang dilakukan bahwa rata-rata nilai throughput pada setiap lokasi pengukuran dalam keadaan sedang, nilai delay didapatkan rata-rata kondisi sedang, nilai jitter didapatkan rata-rata kondisi bagus sedangkan nilai packet loss didapatkan rata-rata sangat bagus. Kesimpulannya adalah kondisi jaringan di Universitas Lancang Kuning pada jam-jam sibuk, adakalanya stabil dan down. Tetapi pada jam sepi kondisi jaringan dalam keadaan stabil.
Kata kunci: QoS, Troughput, Delay, Jitter, Packet Loss
Downloads
References
[2] H. Ramadhan, E. Saputra, and M. Fronita, “Analsis Kualitas Layanan Jaringan Internet Menggunakan Metode Rma (Realibility, Maintainability and Availability) Dan QoS (Quality of Service),” J. Rekayasa Dan Manaj. Sist. Inf., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 56–60, 2016.
[3] M. Flannagan, R. Froom, and K. Turek, Cisco Catalyst QoS : Quality of Service in Campus Networks. Indianapolis: Cisco Press, 2003.
[4] A. T. Saeed, A. Esmailpour, and N. Nasser, “Performance analysis for the QoS support in LTE and WiFi,” IEEE Wirel. Commun. Netw. Conf. WCNC, vol. 2016-September, no. Nwm5g, 2016.
[5] S. Vhatkar, J. Rana, and M. Atique, “Performance Evaluation and QoS Analysis of EEPB and PDCH Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks,” in 2017 Fourteenth International Conference on Wireless and Optical Communications Networks (WOCN), 2017.
[6] X. Xu, K. Tang, Y. Shi, J. Li, and S. Yang, “Performance analysis of dynamic bandwidth allocation scheme based on QoS in satellite networks,” in 2010 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing, WCSP 2010, 2010.
[7] N. Nasser and S. Guizani, “Performance analysis of a cell-based call admission control scheme for QoS support inmultimedia wireless networks,” Int. J. Commun. Syst., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 633–652, 2010.
[8] A. R. Dhaini, P. H. Ho, and X. Jiang, “Performance analysis of QoS-aware layer-2 VPNs over fiber-wireless (FiWi) networks,” in GLOBECOM - IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2010.
[9] F. P. A. of R. for Q. H. A. for S. of A. N. in H. W. N. Karam, “Performance Analysis of Ranking for QoS Handover Algorithm for Selection of Access Network in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks,” in 2012 21st International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), 2012.
[10] P. C. Lin, R. G. Cheng, and L. H. Liao, “Performance analysis of two-level QoS scheduler for wireless backhaul networks,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 1361–1371, 2012.
[11] J. S. Vardakas, N. Zorba, C. Skianis, and C. V. Verikoukis, “Performance analysis of M2M communication networks for QoS-differentiated smart grid applications,” in 2015 IEEE Globecom Workshops, GC Wkshps 2015 - Proceedings, 2015, pp. 0–5.
[12] J. S. Vardakas, I. D. Moscholios, M. D. Logothetis, and V. G. Stylianakis, “Performance analysis of OCDMA PON configuration supporting multi-rate bursty traffic with retrials and QoS differentiation,” Opt. Switch. Netw., vol. 13, pp. 112–123, 2014.
[13] J. Hua and N. Jiang, “QoS Performance Analysis for the Second User in the Overlay Cognitive Radio Networks,” in Proceedings - 2015 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery, CyberC 2015, 2015, pp. 513–516.
[14] A. E. A. Farghal, H. M. H. Shalaby, K. Kato, and R. K. Pokharel, “Performance Analysis of Multicode OCDM Networks Supporting Elastic Transmission With QoS Differentiation,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 741–752, 2016.
[15] K. Yamaguchi, T. Nagahashi, T. Akiyama, T. Yamaguchi, and H. Matsue, “A routing based on OLSR with traffic load balancing and QoS for Wi-Fi mesh network,” in International Conference on Information Networking, 2016, vol. 2016-March, pp. 102–107.
[16] H. Singh and M. Singh, “Performance Analysis of QoS in PMP Mode WiMAX Networks,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 26–29, 2010.
[17] N. Sulaiman and C. Y. Yaakub, “Investigation on QoS of Campus-wide WiFi Networks,” J. Telecommun., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 12–16, 2010.
[18] M. Griera, M. Jiménez, and J. A. Martínez, “QOS evaluation model for a campus-wide network: An alternative approach focussing on availability,” Comput. Networks, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 739–746, 2001.
[19] R. Wulandari, “Analisis QoS (Quality of Service) Pada Jaringan Internet (Studi Kasus: UPT Loka Uji Teknik Penambangan Jampang Kulon - LIPI),” J. Tek. Inform. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 2, pp. 162–172, 2016.
[20] Y. A. Pranata, I. Fibriani, and S. B. Utomo, “Analisis Optimasi Kinerja Quality Of Service Pada Layanan Komunikasi Data Menggunakan NS - 2 di PT . PLN ( PERSERO ) Jember,” Sinergi, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 149–156, 2016.
[21] R. S. L. D. M. Pinem, “Analisis Quality of Service (QoS) Jaringan Internet di SMK Telkom Medan,” Singuda Ensikom, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 131–136, 2014.
[22] Juhardi and I. Yasri, “Analisa Quality of Service (QoS) Jaringan Internet Berbasis High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) Pada PT. Telkomsel,” J. FTeknik, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2016.
