The Implementation of Simple Additive Weighting Method in deciding Apprentice Assistant

Hamid Muhammad Jumasa; Wahju Tjahjo Saputro

doi:10.31849/digitalzone.v13i1.9880

Hamid Muhammad Jumasa Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo
Wahju Tjahjo Saputro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31849/digitalzone.v13i1.9880

Keywords: Apprentice, Companion, Simple Additive Weighting

Abstract

An internship is a mandatory course to be taken by a sixth-grader. Students should finish the course by either apprenticing or making a product in the form of software. The problem often is that students enroll and choose partners. The student files already stored should be matched to the data of the previous semester conventionally. Another problem is that students select partners based not on the field of interest but based on following their friends. Students have difficulty completing an apprenticeship. Therefore, the study examined the identification of an apprentice by using the simple, adapting method, the research object was the student of the semester VI apprentice, the method of storing data using literature, observation, and interviews. Research results from simple standard weighting show K1 criteria at 0.75, K2 at 0.5, structural criteria at 0.25, and requirement criteria of 1. The results of the accuracy test are 80% so that the SAW method can be developed as a decision support system in determining internship lecturers based on the student's field of interest.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

L. Made Yulyantari and I. Puritan Wijaya ADH, Manajemen Model Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset, 2019.

H. Nurmawan, Y. F. Andriani, and Kusrini, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Karyawan Berprestasi Pada Pt. ABC Dengan Metode SAW,” J. INFORMA, Politek. Indones., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2019.

I. Septiana, M. Irfan, A. R. Atmadja, and B. Subaeki, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentu Dosen Penguji Dan Pembimbing Tugas Akhir Menggunakan Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Dengan Simple Additive Weighting,” J. JOIN, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2016.

D. S. Lutfi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Dosen Baru Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” J. Teknol. Inform. dan Terap., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 11–16, 2017.

A. R. Irawati and H. Saptomo, “Decision Support System Development For Determining The Preceptor Lectures In Proposing Internship Essay, Thesis And Final Project By Using SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) Method In Department Of Computer Science, Faculty Of Mathematic And Natural Science,” J. Komputasi, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 74–87, 2018.

O. S. Siregar, F. Fauseh, and D. P. Rosalina Gustari, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Pemilihan Minat Mahasiswa Jurusan Teknik Informatika Menggunakan Metode AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) di Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak,” Digit. Intell., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 11, 2020, doi: 10.29406/diligent.v1i1.2330.

E. T. Palupi, S. T. Safitri, and M. Reza, “Penerapan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pengambilan Peminatan pada Program Studi Sistem Informasi di Institut Teknologi Telkom Purwokerto,” Conf. Electr. Eng. Telemat. Ind. Technol. Creat. Media, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://conferences.ittelkom-pwt.ac.id/index.php/centive/article/view/93.

T. Elizabeth and Tianiah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Asisten Dosen Menggunakan Metode SAW,” JATISI (Jurnal Tek. Inform. dan Sist. Informasi), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 71–80, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.35957/jatisi.v7i1.221.

M. Fadliyani and Z. A. Nadhiroh, Anis Yusrotun, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Dan Metode Fuzzy Mamdani Untuk Menentukan Dosen Pembimbing Skripsi Di Fakultas Teknik Universitas Nurul Jadid Berbasis Web,” in Conference on Innovation and Application of Science and Tehcnology (CIASTECH), 2018, pp. 609–617.

W. Manaheri and F. Hidayat, “Analisis Dan Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Marketing Terbaik Dengan Menggunakan Fuzzy Multiple Atribut Decission Making Dengan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting),” Zo. Komput., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2018.

D. Pawestri, “Perbandingan Penggunaan Metode AHP Dan Metode SAW Untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Paket Layanan Internet,” Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, 2013.

V. Julianto, “Analisis Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Evaluasi KualitasMengajarDosen Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy AHP dan SAW,” J. Sains dan Inforamtika, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 10–19, 202AD, doi: 10.34128/jsi.v6i1.208.

A. G. Rachmat, B. Suprapty, and A. Najib, “Perbandingan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS untuk Penentuan Dosen Terbaik pada Jurusan Teknologi Informasi Politeknik Negeri Samarinda,” in Prosiding Seminar Ilmu Komputer dan Teknologi Informasi, 2018, pp. 91–97.

I. Y. Pasa, N. Wachid, A. Prasetya, and R. H. Maharrani, “Penerapan Metode SAW Pada Penentuan Penerima Beasiswa Lazizmu,” vol. 5, 2022.

S. Ayu Rizkandari, R. Saptono, and , W., “Pemanfaatan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Dalam Penentuan Mahasiswa Berprestasi Tingkat Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta,” J. Teknol. Inf. ITSmart, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 34, 2016, doi: 10.20961/its.v3i1.646.