The Contradiction Of Diversion Become An Option For Handling And Resolving Cases Against Children Who Complete Criminal Actions

Retno Dwi Astuti; Anggi Dwita Clara Afrilia Sitinjak; Yusabbihu Zafarina Sa`diah; Surya Afif Rahmandika; Herli Antoni

doi:10.31849/jgh.v5i01.13729

Retno Dwi Astuti Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Pakuan Bogor
Anggi Dwita Clara Afrilia Sitinjak Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pakuan
Yusabbihu Zafarina Sa`diah Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Pakuan Bogor
Surya Afif Rahmandika Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Pakuan Bogor
Herli Antoni Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Pakuan Bogor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v5i01.13729

Keywords: Contradiction, Diversion, Child Criminals

Abstract

Diversion is a system of handling outside the formal justice system process due to criminal cases involving child perpetrators who are underage. Settlement through diversion is reserved for children in conflict with the law. This journal writing research method uses normative theory. Therefore, according to Article 108 of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, the diversion system is used for reasons of distancing and separating underage perpetrators from settlement through the formal justice system so that discrimination does not occur against child offenders. Through prevention efforts in the form of diversion, it does not provide a deterrent effect so that underage criminals underestimate the existence of these diversion efforts. Efforts so that child victims are protected from children who commit acts against the law or perpetrators are maximally not giving diversion to children who return to committing crimes after a judge's decision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

N. Y. N. &. M. D. Ariani, “Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Terhadap Curanmor yang dilakukan Oleh Anak di Kabupaten Buleleng (Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor: B/346/2016/Reskrim).,” Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 100-112, 2019.

N. M. &. S. T. R. Dyana C. Jatnika, “Residivis Anak Sebagai Akibat Dari Rendahnya Kesiapan Anak,” Prosiding Penelitian & Pengabdian Terhadap Masyarakat UNPAD, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 261, 2016.

M. A. Irvan Maulana, "Konsep dan Implementasi Restorative justice di Indonesia," DATIN LAW JURNAL , vol. 2, no. 2, p. 12, 2021.

D. K. Ani Triwati, “PIJAKAN PERLUNYA DIVERSI BAGI ANAK DALAM PENANGGULANGAN TINDAK PIDANA,” Jurnal USM Law Review , vol. 4, no. 2, p. 829, 2021.

B. Harefa, “DIVERSI SEBAGAI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK ASASI ANAK DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK DI INDONESIA,” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2-3, 2015.

R. Wiyono, "SISTEM PERADILAN ANAK DI INDONESIA," Jakarta , Sinar Grafika, 2016, p. 4.

R. T. Sidabutar, “"DASAR PERTIMBANGAN PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP PELAKU PEMBUNUHAN OLEH ANGGOTA GENG MOTOR,” UAJY, p. 20, 2018.

A. Ratomi, “Konsep Prosedur Pelaksanaan Diversi Pada Tahap Penyidikan Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak,” Arena Hukum, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 400, 2013.

F. Ananda, “Penerapan Diversi Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum,” Jurnal Daulat Hukum, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 81.

N. Rosidah, “Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak,” LPPM UNILA IR, pp. 18-25, 2019.

W. Afifah, “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI SAKSI DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK,” DIH, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 10, no. 20, p. 70, 2014.

D. Setyowati, “Memahami Konsep Restorative Justice sebagai Upaya Sistem Peradilan Pidana Menggapai Keadilan,” Pandecta, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 129-132, 2020.

P. J. Hairi, “ Konsep dan Pembaruan Residivisme dalam Hukum Pidana di Indonesia,” Jurnal Negara Hukum, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 200, 2018.

M. P. A. F. Andi Suci Syifawaru, “Tinjauan Kriminolgi Terhadap Residivis Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pelecehan Seksual,” Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 154-157, 2022.

H. Hartanto, “KLITIH SEBAGAI BENTUK KEJAHATAN DISERTAI KEKERASAN (EXTRAORDINARY JUVENILE DELIQUENCY)/,” Juris Humanity, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 15, 2022.