Analisis Strategi Pemasaran Madu Kelulut pada Koperasi Taruna Jaya Kabupaten Siak
Keywords:
MarketingAbstract
The reason of this take a look at became to determine the elements that precipitated the non-fulfillment of the target of Kelulut Honey inside the Taruna Jaya Cooperative, Siak Regency. In scripting this thesis, the author makes use of data analysis with a descriptive method, even as the pattern in this study is some clients who need 2020 at the Taruna Jaya Cooperative, Siak Regency. The system used to determine the sample size is the Slovin formula for 70 samples.
The sub-product variables with 4 indicators include quality/quality, brand, size and packaging with a median rating of 3.91 which is categorized as good. The quality/quality indicator has the highest weight score with a score/weight of 4.26 which is in the very good category, while packaging with the lowest weight score is 3.63 in the good category. And overall the product subvariables are categorized as good. fees with four indicators encompass charge affordability, rate conformity with product high-quality, fee suitability with benefits, and rate consistent with ability or charge competitiveness. the highest weight score of four.06 is in the top class by the fee suitability indicator with benefits, while the lowest score is three.21 by the charge indicator according to capacity or price competitiveness that is in the terrible category. And average, it could be concluded that the rate policy with a score of 3.sixty four is in properly category. The vicinity sub-variable is understood from five indicators with a median weight or rating of 2.89 which average region coverage remains not appropriate, the stock indicator with a score of 3.66 is an indicator with the highest weight and strategic area with a rating of two.66 is an indicator with a weight or lowest common rating. 3 promoting signs are still classified as not appropriate as visible from the common score or weight of 1.92 which is labeled as not correct. The advertising indicator with a rating of 2.00 has the highest rating and personal promoting with a score of 1.81 that is categorized as no longer good.
References
Alma, Buchari, H, DR. Prof, 2013. Manajemen Pemasaran dan Pemasaran Jasa, Edisi Revisi. Bandung : CV Alfabeta.
Chandra, Gregorius. 2011.Strategi dan Program Pemasaran. Yogyakarta : Penerbit ANDI.
Hadiyati, 2017, Pengantar Manajemen, Pekanbaru : CV. Karya Novia.
Hasibuan, Malayu, SP. 2012, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, cetakan Keenambelas, Jakarta : PT. Bumi Aksara.
Kotler, Philip. 2013. Manajemen Pemasaran Analisis, Perencanaan, Implementasi dan Pengendalian, Edisi Keenam. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga.
Kotler, dan Gary Amstrong. 2012. Prinsip-prinsip Pemasaran, Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga.
Moenir. H.A.S, Drs. 2010. Manajemen Pelayanan Umum di Indonesia. Jakarta : PT. Bumi Aksara
Sowter, Colin. V. 2018. Cara Mudah Memahami Pemasaran. Jakarta : CV. Teruna Grafica.
Tjiptono, Fandy. 2015.Manajemen Jasa. Yogyakarta : Andi
Tjiptono, Fandy, 2015. Strategi Pemasaran : Yogyakarta : Andi.
Swastha, Basu, Drs. DH, 2014. Azas-azas Marketing, Yogyakarta : Penerbit Liberty.
Swastha, Basu, Drs. DH, 2010. Manajemen PemasaranModern. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Liberty.
Sutojo, Siswanto. 2011. Manajemen Penjualan yang Efektif. Jakarta : PT. Damar Mulia Pustaka.
Sutojo, Siswanto. 2015. Strategi Manajemen Pemasaran. Jakarta : PT. Damar Mulia Pustaka.
Wibisono, Dermawan. Ph.D. 2011. Manajemen Kinerja, Konsep, Desain, dan Teknik Meningkatkan Daya Saing Perusahaan. Jakarta : Erlangga.
William, N. Dunn. 2016. Analisis Kebijaksanaan Publik, Disunting oleh Dr. Muhajir Darwin Yogyakarta : Hanindita.


