Classroom Assessment Practices of EFL Lecturers with Current Curriculum Implementation: Where Policy Meets Practice

  • Alfian Alfian Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1344-8192
  • M. Nur Akbar Rasyid Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Akhmad Habibi Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia
  • Noprival Noprival Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Harapan Ibu Jambi, The Hok, Jambi, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1344-8192
  • Mohammad Yusuf Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia
Keywords: Assessment practice, Curriculum, IQF, Attitude, Knowledge, KKNI, EFL Students

Abstract

Within the context of Indonesian higher education, the assessment focuses on the three domains of students’ competencies, namely knowledge, skills, and attitude. Therefore, this study aims to explore the assessment practice of EFL lecturers, especially the methods used in assessing the three students’ competencies. It also explores the general assessment practice and examines differences by educational degree and length of teaching experience. This quantitative study relies on survey data from 71 participants joining the EFL lecturers’ association in Indonesia. Furthermore, the convenient sampling technique was used to determine the sample, and the data were analyzed using SPSS version 24. The results showed that the lecturers employed various methods in assessing the three domains of students’ competencies. It was also found that the lecturers mostly employed observation (66.2%) for assessing attitudes domain, tests (33.8%) for assessing knowledge, and work performance (29.6%) for skills. The findings demonstrated that the lecturers have followed the assessment policy of the government related to the method, purpose, instrumentation, procedure, and reporting grade. The results also showed no differences in the assessment practice between lecturers with Master and Doctoral degrees. Additionally, there was no difference among the four categories of teaching experiences in the assessment practice. These findings are expected to become a reference for lecturers and curriculum development in conducting and designing appropriate assessments to guarantee teaching and learning quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adinda, D., & Denami, M. (2022, February). "Emergency course" During the covid 19 pandemic: How to support students' competencies development?. In IConVET 2021: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Vocational Education and Technology, IConVET 2021, 27 November 2021, Singaraja, Bali, Indonesia (p. 350). European Alliance for Innovation.

Alfiriani, A. (2016). Evaluasi pembelajaran dan implementasinya. Padang Sukabina Press

Beenstock, M., & Feldman, D. (2018). Decomposing university grades: a longitudinal study of students and their instructors. Studies in Higher Education, 43(1),114-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1157858

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practice, 25(6), 551-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807

Chalmers, D. &Partridge, L. (2013). Teaching graduate attributes and academic skills. In L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (Eds.), University teaching in focus: A learning-centered approach (pp. 56-73). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203079690-4

Custer, R. L., & et al. (2000). Using authentic assessment in vocational education. clearinghouse on adults, career, and vocational education. The Ohio State University.

Diktis (2018, June 23). The PTKI curriculum development guide refers to the KKNI and SN-DIkti. Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia. https://fe.uin-malang.ac.id/panduan-pengembangan-kurikulum-ptki-mengacu-pada-kkni-dan-sn-dikti/

DIKTIS . (2019, June 23). Learning and assessment guidelines for PTKI. the ministry of religion of the republic of Indonesia. https://pdfcoffee.com/pedoman-pembelajaran-dan-penilaian-pada-ptkipdf-pdf-free.html

Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. (2012, June 22). Law of the republic of Indonesia number 12 of 2012 concerning higher education. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/39063/uu-no-12-year-2012

Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Corwin Press.

Earl, L. M. (2012). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Corwin Press.

Ermawati, S., & Hidayat, T. (2017). Penilaian autentik dan relevansinya dengan kualitas hasil pembelajaran (persepsi dosen dan mahasiswa IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro). Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 27(1), 92-103. https://doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v5i1.145

Fernández-Gómez, E., Martín-Salvador, A., Luque-Vara, T., Sánchez-Ojeda, M. A., Navarro-Prado, S., & Enrique-Mirón, C. (2020). Content validation through expert judgement of an instrument on the nutritional knowledge, beliefs, and habits of pregnant women. Nutrients, 12(4), 1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12041136

Friantary, H., & Martina, F. (2018). Evaluasi implementasi penilaian hasil belajar berdasarkan kurikulum 2013 oleh Guru bahasa Inggris dan bahasa Indonesia di MTS Ja-Alhaq Kota Bengkulu. Silampari Bisa: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Daerah, Dan Asing, 1(2), 264-283. https://doi.org/10.31540/silamparibisa.v1i2.202

Furwana, D. (2019). Validity and reliability of teacher-made English summative test at second grade of vocational high school 2 Palopo. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v13i2.18967

Gahara, B. (2017). Implementasi penilaian autentik pada pembelajaran pendidikan agama Islam kurikulum 2013. Tanzhim, 1(1), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v2i2.470

Gan, Z., Oon, E. P. T., & Davison, C. (2017). ESL students’ oral performance in English language school-based assessment: results of an empirical study. Language Testing in Asia, 7(1), 1-21.

García-Peñalvo, F. J., Corell, A., Abella-García, V., & Grande-de-Prado, M. (2021). Recommendations for mandatory online assessment in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. In radical solutions for education in a Crisis Context (pp. 85-98). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7869-4_6

Ghafar, M. N. A. (2011). Pembinaan & analisis ujian bilik darjah. Edisi Kedua. Penerbit UTM Press.

Hamodi, C., López-Pastor, V. M., & López-Pastor, A. T. (2017). If I experience formative assessment whilst studying at university, will I put it into practice later as a lecturer? Formative and shared assessment in Initial Lecturer Education (ITE). European Journal of Lecturer Education, 40(2), 171-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1281909

Harun, C. Z., & Iqbal, M. (2018). Performance assessment of state senior high school teachers aged 56 years and above. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 33-46.

Hattie, J. &Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/ 10.3102/003465430298487

Ibrahim, M. M., Baharin, M. N., Mohamad, M. M., & Yukasof, Y. (2017). Innovative approaches to assessment: Develop a sense of direction to promote students learning. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities. Special Issue (25S), p149-155

Kartomo (2011). Efektifitas penilaian diri dan teman sejawat untuk penilaian formative dan sumative pada pembelajaran mata kuliah analysis komplek. Prosiding seminar Nasional Matematika. Prodi matematika Universitas Muhammadyah Surakarta. https://doi.org/10.24269/js.v2i2.802

Kasmah, K. A. S. M. A. H. (2018). Konsep dasar evaluasi dalam kurikulum berbasis kkni. Adaara: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 555-570

Kurniati, N., & Khaliq, A. (2019, September). Penilaian sikap, pengetahuan dan keterampilan dalam pembelajaran bahasa Inggris yang berorientasi kurikulum 2013. In Seminar Nasional Taman Siswa Bima (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 309-316). https://doi.org/10.30738/caraka.v5i2.4832

Kusaeri, K. (2019). Penilaian sikap dalam pembelajaran Matematika [Assessment of attitudes in learning Mathematics]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JPM), 5(2), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v5i2.1588

Lake, R., & Olson, L. (2020). Learning as we go: principles for effective assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Center on Reinventing Public Education.

Linn, R. L., & Miller, M.D. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Listiyawati, L., Anggita, A., Wahyuni, R., & Heriyanto, H. (2021). Penilaian alternatif pada keterampilan berbicara bahasa Inggris di sekolah menengah kejuruan kota Pontianak [Alternative assessment on English speaking skills in Pontianak City Vocational High School]. Eksos, 17(1), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.31573/eksos.v17i1.342

Maba, W., & Mantra, I. B. N. (2017). An analysis of assessment models employed by the Indonesian elementary school lecturers. International journal of social sciences and humanities, 1(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v1n1.38

Martha, A. S. D., Junus, K., Santoso, H. B., & Suhartanto, H. (2021). Assessing undergraduate students-learning competencies: A case study of higher education context in Indonesia. Education Sciences, 11(4), 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040189

Menristekdikti (2015, June 22). Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi (Number 44 of 2015 concerning SNPT). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/140595/permen-ristekdikti-no-44-year-2015

Nasution, H. F., Sudrajat, A., & Jahro, I. S. (2019). Analysis of affective assessment material in the textbook evaluation of Chemistry learning outcomes based on SNPT and Curriculum KKNI. In 4th Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2019) (pp. 727-729). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-19.2019.133

Newton, P. E. (2007). Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment. Assessment in Education, 14(2), 149-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09695940701478321

Nikmah, L., & Makhshun, T. (2021). Implementasi penilaian autentik dalam pembelajaran pendidikan agama Islam. Prosiding Konstelasi Ilmiah Mahasiswa Unissula (KIMU) Klaster Humanoira. https://doi.org/10.19105/rjpai.v3i2.6358

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2012). Educational assessment of students (6th ed.). Pearson.

Norris, J. M. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In M. Long and C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch30

Onyefulu, C. (2018). Assessment practices of teachers in selected primary and secondary schools in Jamaica. Open Access Library Journal, 5(12), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105038

Otaya, L. G. (2017). Konstruksi penilaian berbasis kinerja (Performance based assessment) dalam meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran mahasiswa pada mata kuliah statistika [Construction of performance based assessment in improving students' reasoning ability in statistics course]. Tadbir: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 28-51. https://doi.org/10.24127/ja.v5i1.850

Panadero, E., Fraile, J., Fernández Ruiz, J., Castilla-Estévez, D., & Ruiz, M. A. (2019). Spanish university assessment practices: examination tradition with diversity by faculty. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(3), 379-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1512553

Pemerintah Indonesia (2020, January 29). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 tahun 2020 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. https://lldikti13.kemdikbud.go.id/2020/01/29/peraturan-menteri-pendidikan-dan-kebudayaan-republik-indonesia-nomor-3-tahun-2020-tentang-standar-nasional-pendidikan-tinggi/

Puad, L. M. A. Z., & Ashton, K. (2021). Teachers’ views on classroom-based assessment: an exploratory study at an Islamic boarding school in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(2), 253-265

Rahmawati, L. E., Suwandi, S., Saddhono, K., & Setiawan, B. (2019). Construction of test instrument to assess foreign student's competence of Indonesian language through objective test. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1243a

Retnawati, H. (2015). Hambatan guru matematika sekolah menengah pertama dalam menerapkan kurikulum baru. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 34(3), 390-403. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v3i3.7694

Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., & Nugraha, A. C. (2016). Vocational high school Lecturers’ difficulties in implementing the assessment in curriculum 2013 in Yogyakarta province of Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.914a

Reynold, C. R., Livingstone, R. B. & Wilson, V. (2010). Measurement and assessment in Education. Pearson.

Rodríguez-Gómez, G. R., Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S. I., & García-Jiménez, E. G. (2013). Autoevaluación, evaluación entre iguales y coevaluación: conceptualización y práctica en las universidades españolas. Revista de investigación en educación, 2(11), 198-210. https://doi.org/10.1344/reyd2019.19.29097

Rohl, M. (1999). Profiling ESL children: How teachers interpret and use national and state assessment frameworks. Queensland Journal of Educational Research, 15(1), 113-122.

Rukmini, D., & Saputri, L. A. D. E. (2017). The authentic assessment to measure students’ English productive skills based on 2013 curriculum. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 263-273.

Saefurrohman, S. (2018, December). EFL teachers assessment methods in oral Communications. In 5th Asia Pasific Education Conference (AECON 2018) (pp. 268-272). Atlantis Press.

Saftari, M., & Fajriah, N. (2019). Penilaian ranah afektif dalam bentuk penilaian skala sikap untuk menilai hasil belajar. Edutainment: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Kependidikan, 7(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.35438/e.v7i1.164

Salirawati, D. 1998. Perlunya tes formatif dalam upaya peningkatan kualitas pendidikan di jurusan Kimia dan di jurusan lain pada umumnya. Cakrawala Pendidikan, Anniversary special edition, 191-201. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/nh3ea

Sathasivam, R. V., Samuel, M., Norjoharudden, M. N., Tee, M. Y., & Leong, K. E. (2019). Assessment for learning: Espoused and enacted practices of Malaysian teachers. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanifies, 27, 47-62.

Scarino, A. (2013). Language assessment literacy as self-awareness: Understanding the role of interpretation in assessment and in teacher learning. Language Testing, 30(3), 309-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480128

Singh, U. G., & De Villiers, M. R. (2012). The use of different types of multiple-choice questions in electronic assessment. Progressio, 34(3), 125-143.

Thorn, D.W. and Deitz, J.C. (1989) Examining Content Validity through the Use of Content Experts. Occupation, Participation, and Health, 9, 334-346 https://doi.org/10.1177/153944928900900602

Tuan, D. M. (2021). Vietnamese EFL teachers’ perceptions and practices of reflective teaching as a tool for professional development. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 3(3), 170-180. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v3i3.7961

Umami, M. (2018). Penilaian autentik pembelajaran pendidikan agama Islam dan budi pekerti dalam kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Kependidikan, 6(2), 222-232. https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v6i2.2259

Uno, H. B., & Koni, S. (2012). Assesment pembelajaran. Bumi Aksara.

VanTassel-Baska, J. (2014). Performance-based assessment. Gifted Child Today, 37(1), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217513509618

Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning?. Studies in educational evaluation, 37(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001

Yahiji, K., Otaya, L. G., & Anwar, O. (2019). Assessment model of student field practice at Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teaching Training in Indonesia: A reality and expectation. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 251-268. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12117a

Yang, H. (2006). A report of an ESL classroom observation in two language schools in Auckland. TESL Canada Journal, 23(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v23i2.52

Yani, G. (2017). Performance -based assessments on Students` speaking skill practiced by Senior High School English teachers in West Java [Doctoral dissertation], Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia).

Yustitia, V., & Wardani, I. S. (2017). Authentic assessment analysis based on the KKNI curriculum in applied statistics learning. In Ideas for 21st Century Education: Proceedings of the Asian Education Symposium (AES 2016), November 22-23, 2016, Bandung, Indonesia (p. 55). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315166575-9

Yuwono, I., & Pasani, C. F. (2018). The evaluation of higher order thinking skills assessment of special needs education students with guided inquiry method. Journal of ICSAR, 2(1), 28-31. https://doi.org/10.17977/um005v2i12018p028

Zaidi, N. L. B., Grob, K. L., Monrad, S. M., Kurtz, J. B., Tai, A., Ahmed, A. Z., & Santen, S. A. (2018). Pushing critical thinking skills with multiple-choice questions: does Bloom’s taxonomy work?. Academic Medicine, 93(6), 856-859. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002087

Zaim, M., & Arsyad, S. (2020). Authentic Assessment for speaking skills: Problem and solution for English secondary school teachers in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 587-604. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13340a

Zulaiha, S., Mulyono, H., & Ambarsari, L. (2020). An investigation into EFL teachers' assessment literacy: Indonesian teachers' perceptions and classroom practice. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 9(1), 189-201.

Published
2022-12-24
How to Cite
Alfian, A., Rasyid, M. N. A., Habibi, A., Noprival, N., & Yusuf, M. (2022). Classroom Assessment Practices of EFL Lecturers with Current Curriculum Implementation: Where Policy Meets Practice. REiLA : Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 4(3), 320-334. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v4i3.11005
Abstract viewed = 331 times
PDF downloaded = 304 times