A Comparative Study on the Use of First-Person Pronouns in Ten International Diplomatic Speeches

  • Surendra Pokhrel Daito Bunka University, Tokyo, Japan
Keywords: Culture, Diplomacy, Discourse, Gender differences, Pronouns, Persuasion

Abstract

This paper explores how world leaders use first-person pronouns in diplomatic speeches as a case study on how stance is communicated in high-stakes situations. The dataset comprises ten speeches to security and the economy given by heads of state/governments to their counterparts at international conferences/summits. The data were analysed from a quantitative/corpus-linguistic perspective using AntConc (Anthony, 2021) to summarise general patterns of personal pronoun use and then from a qualitative/discourse-analytical perspective, identifying specifically related examples for more detailed interpretation in context. The contextual features considered for the critical discourse analysis were gender, ideology, and the political systems of the speaker’s country. The results showed that most lead favoured the plural first-person pronoun “we” over the singular “I”. This was especially marked for the Middle Eastern leaders in the sample. The plural form was used for two main functions: (i) audience-inclusivity, referring to the audience of delegates/attendees, and (ii) audience-exclusivity, referring to the nation represented by the speaker. The distribution of these functions in the individual speeches varied greatly, ranging from extreme inclusive use (85%; Temer [Brazil]) to extreme exclusive use (65%; Putin [Russia]); this was largely predictable based on the speaker’s role at the event (e.g., facilitator vs dissenter from a consensus view) and the level of perceived national power. “I” was found to be used mostly at the beginning of the speeches to extend gratitude to the organisers. However, it was often deployed to increase the speaker’s self-dedication throughout an address. Similarly, whereas deployed throughout the speeches to establish a sense of communal rapport between the audience and the speaker. The evidence does not suggest any major differences in the usage of first-person pronouns based on gender, as shown by similarities in the speeches of German Chancellor Merkel and Bangladeshi Prime Minister Hasina.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, I., & Mehmood, A. (2015). Gender differences in the use of parts of speech in Pakistani English newspaper columns: A critical discourse analysis. New Media and Mass Communication, 36, 10–15.

Alavidze, M. (2017). The use of personal pronoun in political discourse. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 9(4), 349–355.

Anderson, L. (2012). Personal pronouns in editor’s letters: A gender-based study. [Dissertation, Linnaeus University]. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:647390/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Bach, K., & Harnish, R. M. (1982). Linguistic communication and speech acts. MIT Press.

Beard, A. (2000). The language of politics. Routledge.

Berbeira Gardo ́n, J.L. (2006). On the semantics and pragmatics of will. In M. Carretero, L. Downing, J. Lavid, E. Mart ́ınez, J. Neff, S. Ayala & E. Sa ́nchez-Pardo (eds.), A pleasure of life in words: a festschrift for angela downing (pp 445–465). Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

Bramley, N. R. (2001). pronouns of politics: the use of pronouns in the construction of ‘self ’ and ‘other’ in political interviews. [Doctoral dissertation, Australian National University]. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/46225/5/01front.pdf

Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. Sebok (Ed.), Style in Language (pp. 253–276). MIT Press.

Brownlow, S., Rosamond, J. A., & Parker, J. A. (2003). Gender-linked linguistic behavior in television interviews. Sex Roles, 49(3), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024404812972

Bull, H. (1977). The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. MacMillan.

Burhanudeen, H. (2006). Diplomatic language: An insight from speeches used in international diplomacy. Akademika, 67(1), 37-51.

Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press.

Chilton, P. (2003). Analyzing political discourse, theory and practice. Routledge.

Chilton, P., & Schäffner, C. (2002). Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse. In P. Chilton & C. Schäffner (Eds.), politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse (pp. 1–41). John Benjamins.

Chrisman, M. (2015). Deontic modals. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis.

Coates, J. (1983). The Semantics of the modal auxiliaries. Croom Helm.

Collins, P. (2009). Modals and quasi-modals in english. Rodopi.

Dahnilsyah, D. (2017). The implied power through the use of personal pronouns in Obama’s speeches: critical discourse analysis. International Journal of Educational Best Practices, 1(2), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.31258/ijebp.v1n2.p59-71

Dong, J. (2014). Study on gender differences in language under the Sociolinguistics. Canadian Social Science, 10(3), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.3968/4602

Ekawati, R. (2019). Power through linguistic modalities in Indonesian presidential speeches. Discourse and Interaction, 12(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.5817/di2019-1-5

Escandell, V. (1993). Introducción a La Pragmática. Ariel.

Fatemeh, M. (2016). Gender Differences in the Use of Hedges and First Person Pronouns in Research Articles of Applied Linguistics and Chemistry. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(6), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.6p.166

Giannakidou, A., & Staraki, E. (2013). Ability, action, and causation: From pure ability to force. In A. Mari, C. Beyssade, & F. del Prete (Eds.), Genericity (pp. 250–275). Oxford University Press.

Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Blackwell.

Greene, A. (2020). Pronouns: the importance of our everyday language. Curiosity: Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Innovation, 1(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.36898/001c.18864

Håkansson, J. (2012). The use of personal pronouns in political speeches: A comparative study of the pronominal choices of two American presidents. [Dissertation, Linnaeus University]. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:531167/fulltext01.pdf

Hall, E.T (1959). The silent language. Doubleday.

Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor.

Halmari, H. (2004). Persuasion across genres. A linguistic approach. John Benjamins Publishing.

Harianja, R., Yudar, R. S., Deliani, S., Nursafira, M. S., & Hamuddin, B. (2020). An analysis of pronouns used in selected international journal articles: Exploring authors’ flexibility and consistency. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 1(3), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v1i3.3839

Harris, A. (2009). Creative leadership. Management in Education, 23(1), 9–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020608099076

Houston, A. (1984). Reviewed work: The semantics of the modal auxiliaries by Jennifer Coates. Language in Society, 13(2), 276–279. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4167529

Ishikawa, Y. (2015). Gender differences in vocabulary use in essay writing by university students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.078

Jacobs, R. A. (1995). English Syntax: A grammar for English language professionals. Oxford University Press

Kacewicz, E., Pennebaker, J. W., Davis, M., Jeon, M., & Graesser, A. C. (2013). Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x13502654

Karapetjana, I. (2011). Pronominal choice in political interviews. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 1(1), 36–45.

Kealey, D. J. (1996). Interpersonal and cultural dimensions of Canadian development assistance in Egypt. Canadian International Development Agency.

Kealey, D. J., & Macdonald, D. (2004). Intercultural competence and its relevance for international diplomacy. In T. Vulpe, & H. Salvik (Eds.), Intercultural Communication and Diplomacy (pp. 431–444). Diplo Foundation.

Lakoff, G. (1975). Language and woman’s place. Harper Colophon Books.

Laukkanen, O. (2019). A corpus study of personal pronouns in American state of the union addresses from Reagan to Trump. [Masters Dissertation, University of Helsinki]. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/301914/Laukkanen_Olavi_Pro_gradu_2019.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=2

Leech, G. (1987). Meaning and the English verb. (2nd ed.). Longman.

Mautner, G. (2009). Corpora and Critical Discourse Analysis. In P. Baker (Ed.), Contemporary Corpus Linguistics (pp. 32–46). Continuum.

Na, Z. (2012). An analysis of vagueness in diplomatic language: From the perspectives of the cooperative principle and the politeness principle. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.

Pennycook, A. (1994). The politics of pronouns. ELT Journal, 48(2), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/48.2.173

Pokhrel, S. (2020). Diplomatic language: An analysis of salutations from speeches used in international diplomacy. Journal of International Affairs. 3(1), 180-193.https://doi.org/10.3126/joia.v3i1.29094

Satow, E. (1932). A Guide to diplomatic practice (3rd ed.). Longman.

Shibatani, M. (1990). The languages of Japan. Cambridge University Press.

Sinclair, J. (1990). English Grammar. Collins.

Van Dijk, T. (2004). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis. (pp. 352-371). Blackwell.

Wageche, I., & Chi, C. (2016). Corpus based study of personal pronoun’s rhetoric in Obama’s and Xi Jinping’s diplomatic discourse. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(5), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n5p32

Xia, X. (2013). Gender differences in using language. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(8), 1485–1489.

Published
2022-12-19
How to Cite
Pokhrel, S. (2022). A Comparative Study on the Use of First-Person Pronouns in Ten International Diplomatic Speeches . REiLA : Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 4(3), 290-308. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v4i3.11100
Abstract viewed = 468 times
PDF downloaded = 294 times