Language in Cinema: A Pragmatic Study of Violation Contexts in Disney’s Animated Film Zootopia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31849/9b49rq25Keywords:
Language in film, Cinematic discourse, Emotional responses, Pragmatic awareness , Multimodal pragmaticsAbstract
Language in animated films serves not only as a medium for storytelling but also as a reflection of pragmatic norms that govern social interaction. Although politeness strategies have been widely studied in natural discourse, there remains a notable gap in understanding how violations of these norms are embedded within cinematic dialogues, especially in films intended for all age groups. This study investigates the violation of politeness maxims proposed by Geoffrey Leech, including the Tact, Generosity, Approbation, Modesty, Agreement, and Sympathy maxims, as portrayed in the interactions involving Judy Hopps, the main character in Disney's Zootopia. Utilizing a qualitative descriptive method, the research analyzes selected utterances from the movie transcript and audiovisual scenes, focusing on the types of maxims violated and the emotional responses elicited. The results indicate that all six maxims are violated by supporting characters, with the Approbation Maxim emerging as the most frequently violated, comprising 44.4 percent of cases. These violations often lead to emotional consequences for the main character such as frustration, disappointment, and a sense of exclusion. This study contributes to the field of pragmatics by highlighting how impoliteness is constructed and perceived in fictional dialogues, providing new insights into language use in media contexts. Furthermore, it emphasizes the potential of animated films as valuable resources for teaching pragmatic awareness and promoting respectful communication. By critically examining how politeness is portrayed and breached, the study calls attention to the broader implications of media discourse in shaping audience perceptions of social interaction and linguistic behavior.
References
AlAfnan, M. (2021). Diglossic features of the arabic-speaking community in australia: the influences of age, education, and prestige. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 462-470. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.29
Andries, F. A., Meissl, K., & de Vries, C. (2023). Multimodal stance-taking in interaction: A systematic literature review. Multimodality of Communication, 8(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1187977
Aspers, P. and Corte, U. (2021). What is qualitative in research. Qualitative Sociology, 44(4), 599-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-021-09497-w
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(3), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
Breeze, R. (2023). Signalling reflexivity and complexity: a step analysis of methods sections in qualitative social science research. Esp Today, 11(1), 138-159. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2023.11.1.7
Dessari, W., Hendayanti, O., & Haristiani, N. (2021). Politeness in japanese prohibition speech act. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211119.110
Dewi, R., Amin, B., & Qalbi, N. (2023). Politeness principles used by EFL teachers in classroom interaction during the teaching-learning process. Journal of Developing Research, 7(1), 1–13.
Eakin, J. and Gladstone, B. (2020). “value-adding” analysis: doing more with qualitative data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920949333
Geenen, J., Norris, S., & Makboon, B. (2015). Multimodal discourse analysis. The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, 1-17. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi095
Ghasani, B. (2021). Interactional sociolinguistics in casual conversation of graduate student in efl context: A pragmatics study. Epigram, 18(2). 80-87. https://doi.org/10.32722/epi.v18i2.3750
He, Z. (2024). The interpretation of feminism in feminist movie poster from the perspective of multimodal discourse analysis--taking barbie as an example. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 6(7), 101-104. https://doi.org/10.53469/jssh.2024.06(07).22
Hussain, A. (2021). Politeness strategies in imran khan’s maiden speech as prime minister of pakistan. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 5(II), 908-924. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2021(5-ii)71
Intyaswati, D., Maryani, E., Sugiana, D., & Venus, A. (2021). Social media as an information source of political learning in online education. Sage Open, 11(2). 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211023181
Intyaswati, D., Simanihuruk, H., Supratman, S., & Fairuzza, M. (2023). Student political efficacy learning through second screening and online discussion. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(1), 123-133.. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0011
Kim, D., Weeks, B., Lane, D., Hahn, L., & Kwak, N. (2021). Sharing and commenting facilitate political learning on facebook: evidence from a two-wave panel study. Social Media + Society, 7(3).1-10 https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211047876
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principle of pragmatics. New York, NY: Longman.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2016). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta, Indonesia: Rosdakarya.
Musdalifah, M. and Satriani, S. (2021). Motivation for learning and english conversation through film media with dubbed and subtitled methods. Jurnal Abdimas Indonesia, 1(4), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.53769/jai.v1i4.146
Mustadi, A. and Amelia, R. (2023). Children's Politeness in Digital Era. In Proceedings of the Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022) (Vol. 698, p. 115). Springer Nature.
Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research, 24(1), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820941288
Patteti, P. and Rajani, D. (2024). Speech and strategy: unpacking political power in india through the language of power. Shodhkosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(5). 1290–1296 https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i5.2024.3001
Peng, Z. (2022). A multimodal discourse analysis of movie posters from the perspective of visual grammar-a case study of "hi, mom". Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(3), 605-609. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1203.22
Pratiwi, D., Saniro, R., & Hawa, A. (2023). The functions of films for children as learning media in children's education. Mukadimah Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 7(1), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.30743/mkd.v7i1.6528
Ratri, A., Ena, O., & Bram, B. (2022). Illocutionary force of slang words in "rampage" 2018 movie. Jurnal Basis, 9(2), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v9i2.6360
Sommerfeld, B. (2022). Between ‘(n)ostalgie’ and ideology – new perspectives on defa children’s film. Dzieciństwo Literatura I Kultura, 4(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.32798/dlk.1010
Wildfeuer, J. (2017). It’s all about logics?! analyzing the rhetorical structure of multimodal filmic text. Semiotica, 2018(220), 95-121. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0139
Xiao-wen, D. (2019, July). A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of the Chinese Poster of The Wandering Earth. In 4th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2019) (pp. 919-921). Atlantis Press.https://doi.org/10.2991/iccessh-19.2019.205
Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Pustaka Pelajar.
Zeng, Y. and Liu, X. (2024). Research on subtitle translation from the perspective of multimodal discourse analysis taking the movie lighting up the stars as an example. Studies in English Language Teaching, 12(2), p156. https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v12n2p156
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fivy A. Andries, Darryl Grant Walalangi, Jennie Posumah, Santje Iroth, Arie Tulus, Fergina Lengkoan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


