Theoretical Perspectives of Discursive Phenomena: DA and Ethnomethodologically DA
Abstract
The aims of this paper try to discuss and present various theoretical perspectives of discursive phenomena, in specific the different research techniques widely known as, as well as the theories. Having presented the main assumptions of the approach the paper, then discusses and analyze discursive interactions’ phenomena, technologically mediated interaction or face-to-face. By concentrating on the pragmatic aspects of discourse, an ethnomethodologically approach of Discourse Analysis (DA), this paper may contribute important ideas and information in media interaction studies.
Downloads
References
Dakowska, M. (2001). Psycholingwistyczne podstawy dydaktyki języków obcych. Wydawn. Nauk. PWN.
Garfinkel, H. (1996). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press
Hamuddin, B. (2012). A Comparative Study of Politeness Strategies in Economic Journals. Doctoral dissertation, University of Malaya
Hamuddin, B. (2015). DISCOURSE ON MEDIA: Bringing Hot News into ELT's Classroom Discussion. Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang, 3, 87-95.
Hamuddin, B., & Noor, F. N. M. (2015, August). A Closer Look on Politeness Strategies in Malaysian Economic Journal. In 2nd INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON LINGUISTICS (p. 52).
Harding, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: From start to finish. SAGE Publications Limited.
Johnstone, B. (2018). Discourse analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Jones, R. H. (2012). Discourse analysis: A resource book for students. New York, NY.
KhosraviNik, M. (2015). Discourse, Identity and Legitimacy. John Benjamins.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
Lucke, A. (1996). Text and Discourse Analysis. New York: American Educational Research Association. Vol. 21:3-17.
Maxwell, J. A. (2010). Essay Review of Jean Anyon's Theory and Educational Research: Toward Critical Social Explanation. Education Review//Reseñas Educativas.
McGregor, S.L.T. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: A Primer. Halifax. Mount Saint Vincent University
Morgan, A. (2010). Discourse analysis: An overview for the neophyte researcher. Journal of Health and Social Care Improvement, 1(May), 1-7.
Okot, M.B. (2007). Text and Textuality in Oral Performance. London. Sage Publications.
Olson, B. (2007). Quantitative “versus” Qualitative Research: The Wrong Question. Edmonton. University of Alberta Press.
Rodrigues. A. D., & Braga, A. A. (2014). Discourse Analysis and Ethnomethodological Discourse Analysis. MATRIZes, 8(2), 117-134.
Rogers, R. (2017). Critical discourse analysis in education. Discourse and education, 41-54.
Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & Joseph, G. O. G. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of educational research, 75(3), 365-416.
Sari, R., Putri, S. E., Herdi, H., & Hamuddin, B. (2018). Bridging critical discourse analysis in media discourse studies. Indonesian EFL Journal, 4(2), 80-89.
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. & Hamilton, H. E. (2003). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden. Oxford: Victoria, Blackwell Publishing
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language (Vol. 4). University of Chicago Press.
Suppes, P. (1974). The place of theory in educational research. Educational researcher, 3(6), 3-10.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of political ideologies, 11(2), 115-140.
Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Sage.
