Digital Orality and Islamic Preaching: Ethnosociopragmatics as a Lens for Humor in Religious Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31849/vyzhn310Keywords:
Cultural humor, Da’wah values, Ethnosociopragmatics, Oral literature, Value-bearing speech actAbstract
Humor has become a pervasive yet insufficiently theorized feature of Indonesian digital da’wah. Existing studies tend to describe rhetorical techniques or audience reception, but rarely examine humorous utterances as culturally embedded pragmatic acts within platform-mediated preaching. This study addresses that gap by investigating how humor in Indonesian YouTube sermons encodes social, cultural, and religious values using an ethnosociopragmatic framework grounded in Mey’s pragmatics as social practice and sociopragmatic theories of appropriateness. The corpus comprises 10 sermons (approximately 600 minutes) delivered by five prominent ulama, selected through explicit criteria: minimum 20-minute duration, over 50,000 views, verified channels, and identifiable humorous segments. From these videos, 109 humorous utterances were segmented as the unit of analysis based on syntactic completion, prosodic closure, topic shift, and audience laughter cues. Data were transcribed verbatim and coded inductively using a structured codebook mapping value domains and oral forms; double-coding yielded 87% inter-coder agreement, and findings were triangulated with repeated viewing and 15 semi-structured audience interviews. Results show three dominant value domains: social solidarity and soft critique (38%), cultural identity through oral forms such as pepatah, pantun, parikan, and guyon pesantren (34%), and reinforcement of religious virtues including sabr, adab, humility, and moderation (28%). These findings demonstrate that humor functions as a value-bearing speech act that digitally recontextualizes sastra lisan while sustaining moral authority. The study contributes theoretically by extending ethnosociopragmatics to digital religious discourse and implies that culturally calibrated humor enhances ethical engagement in contemporary platform preaching.
References
Abdullah, M., Muhid, A., & Wahyudi, R. (2020). Humor dalam dakwah Kyai Ishaq Latif di Pesantren Tebuireng Jombang. Ilmu Dakwah: Academic Journal for Homiletic Studies, 14(2), 302–320. https://doi.org/10.15575/idajhs.v14i2.9053
Ali, M. (2017). Humor in Islamic preaching: A study of rhetorical strategy in religious discourse. Journal of Islamic Communication, 2(1), 15–28.
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. Mouton de Gruyter.
Aziz, M. (2019). Humor in Islamic sermons: Between entertainment and controversy. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Society, 6(2), 45–62.
Baried, S. B., et al. (1985). Tradisi lisan dalam sastra Indonesia. Balai Pustaka.
Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Campbell, H. A., & Tsuria, R. (2021). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in digital media. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Danandjaja, J. (2002). Folklor Indonesia: Ilmu gosip, dongeng, dan lain-lain. Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.
Djamaris, E. (1993). Pengantar sastra lisan Indonesia. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge University Press.
Dynel, M. (2009). Beyond a joke: Types of conversational humour. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(5), 1284–1299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00152.x
Fajrussalam, H., Rachman, A., & Nurdin, S. (2022). Humor dan etika komunikasi dakwah di media sosial: Studi kasus TikTok. Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 12(1), 45–60.
Faqihuddin, A. (2021). Humor in Ustadz Das’ad Latif’s YouTube content.
Finnegan, R. (1992). Oral traditions and the verbal arts: A guide to research practices. Routledge.
Finnegan, R. (2012). Oral literature in Africa. Open Book Publishers.
Foley, J. M. (2002). How to read an oral poem. University of Illinois Press.
Foley, W. A. (1997). Anthropological linguistics: An introduction. Blackwell.
Harahap, R., Siregar, D., & Nasution, F. (2024). Efektivitas humor dalam dakwah di Mandailing Natal. Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi Islam, 14(1), 22–38.
Hutomo, S. (1991). Mutiara yang terlupakan: Pengantar studi tradisi lisan. HISKI Jawa Timur.
Kuipers, G. (2008). The sociology of humor. In V. Raskin (Ed.), The primer of humor research (pp. 361–398). Mouton de Gruyter.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Communication Theory, 10(3), 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00194.x
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Norrick, N. R. (2003). Issues in conversational joking. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1333–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00097-0
Nurdin, A. (2019). Humor sebagai media internalisasi nilai dalam dakwah Islam. Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 39(1), 101–118.
Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. Routledge.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE.
Ridho, A. (2020). Persepsi masyarakat terhadap humor dalam ceramah dakwah.
Sadili, I. (2021). Aspek humor dalam retorika dakwah Gus Baha di media YouTube. Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.24252/jdt.v22i2.23647
Samiyah, N., Utami, R., & Kurniawan, A. (2023). Humor dalam dakwah KH Anwar Zahid: Kajian sosiolinguistik. Jurnal Bahasa dan Dakwah, 9(2), 134–150.
Slama, M., & Barendregt, B. (Eds.). (2018). Digital Indonesia: Connectivity and divergence. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Sweeney, A. (1987). A full hearing: Orality and literacy in the Malay world. University of California Press.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. Routledge.
Wandi. (2020). Penggunaan humor dalam dakwah komunikasi Islam. Al-Din: Jurnal Dakwah dan Sosial Keagamaan, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.35673/ajdsk.v5i1.573
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Siti Rumilah, Ramadhina Ulfa Nuristama, Wahju Kusumajanti , Raudlotul Jannah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


