Critical Semiotics of Pakkiok Bunting  Poem in Makassar Oral Tradition

Authors

  • Asis Nojeng Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Sakaria Sakaria Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Nur Hasbi Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31849/a3c15p44

Keywords:

Ritual poetry , Critical semiotics, Linguistic imagery , Ritual discourse, Symbolic anthropology

Abstract

Ritual language does more than preserve cultural memory; it organizes meaning, legitimizes authority, and shapes gendered identities. Yet research on Pakkiok Bunting , a Makassar wedding poem, has remained descriptive, emphasizing form, function, and values without explaining how linguistic imagery, symbolic expressions, and ritual discourse construct ideology. This study examines how the language of Pakkiok Bunting  produces cultural meaning and reproduces social norms through critical semiotics and symbolic anthropology. Employing a qualitative interpretative-critical design, the study analyzed a textual corpus derived from Puisi-Puisi Makassar (1995), supported by observation, performance documentation, transcription, and translation. Data were examined across imagery, symbols, magical beliefs, gender representation, and customary authority. Trustworthiness was strengthened through triangulation, peer debriefing, an audit trail, and thick description. The findings demonstrate that visual, auditory, kinesthetic, and emotional imagery functions not merely as poetic ornamentation but as linguistic and semiotic resources that create sacredness, emotional intensity, and participation. Waves, mist, the moon, stars, drums, Daeng Bunting, and tears encode destiny, ritual legitimacy, family honor, lineage continuity, and maternal sacrifice. The poem consequently operates as performative-magical discourse: its language does not simply describe reality but helps constitute and legitimize it. It also constructs women as bearers of family dignity while normalizing their reproductive and emotional burdens. The study’s originality lies in conceptualizing ritual poetry as linguistic action and offering a transferable critical-semiotic model for examining how language, power, gender, and cultural memory are negotiated in oral traditions, with implications for culturally responsive preservation, language education, and intergenerational transmission.

Author Biographies

  • Asis Nojeng, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia

    Asis Nojeng is a senor researcher at Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia, whose research interests focus on language, oral literature, cultural semiotics, and the relationship between linguistic expression and cultural meaning. His scholarly work explores how traditional verbal arts preserve collective memory, construct social values, and represent cultural identities. Through interdisciplinary approaches combining linguistics, semiotics, and cultural studies, he contributes to the understanding and preservation of Makassar oral heritage.

  • Sakaria Sakaria, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia

    Sakaria is a senior researcher affiliated with Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia, with academic interests in language studies, cultural expression, and the analysis of local traditions. His research engagement highlights the importance of examining oral narratives as dynamic cultural practices where language, identity, and social values interact. He is committed to advancing linguistic and cultural scholarship through critical interpretations of indigenous knowledge and literary traditions.

  • Nur Hasbi, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia

    Nur Hasbi is an academic researcher at Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia, whose scholarly interests include language, literature, and cultural studies. His research contributes to broader discussions on oral traditions, symbolic meanings, and the role of language in representing community values and cultural identity. Through collaborative academic work, he supports efforts to document, interpret, and sustain Indonesia’s rich linguistic and cultural heritage.

References

Abikenov, Z., & Gabitov, T. (2018). Methodological principles of the semiotic approach in the study of cultural studies. Eurasian Journal of Religious Studies, 16(4), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.26577/EJRS-2018-4-187

Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109

Ahmad, T. (2025). Oral traditions and local authority: Viewing the Indonesian revolution through a cultural lens. Asian Studies Review, 49(2), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2024.2392267

Ajani, Y. A., Oladokun, B. D., Olarongbe, S. A., Amaechi, M. N., Rabiu, N., & Bashorun, M. T. (2024). Revitalizing Indigenous knowledge systems via digital media technologies for sustainability of Indigenous languages. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture, 53(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2023-0051

Alfarisy, F., Ratna, M. P., Girindra Putri, A. R. I., & Pradita Dwi, A. W. (2021). Oral tradition and the tourism village development. E3S Web of Conferences, 317, Article 02019. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131702019

Amir, A. (2013). Sastra lisan Indonesia. Andi.

Ansar, M. (2019). Tradisi Angngaru dalam upacara pernikahan Bija Karaeng: Studi fenomenologi pada masyarakat Gantarang di Kecamatan Tinggimoncong Kabupaten Gowa [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar].

Bauman, R. (1975). Verbal art as performance. American Anthropologist, 77(2), 290–311. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1975.77.2.02a00030

Bird, S. (2020). Decolonising speech and language technology. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 3504–3519). International Committee on Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.313

Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447

Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407

Connelly, W. L. (2021). Ritual and thought: Spirituality and method in philosophy of religion. Religions, 12(12), Article 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12121045

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed (A. Fawaid, Trans.; 3rd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar. (Original work published 2009)

Danandjaja, J. (1984). Folklor Indonesia: Ilmu gosip, dongeng dan lain-lain. Grafiti Pers.

Dundes, A. (1980). Interpreting folklore. Indiana University Press.

Duranti, A. (1997). Universal and culture-specific properties of greetings. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 7(1), 63–97. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1997.7.1.63

Embuiru, H. (1979). Marga bahagia. Nusa Indah.

Eragamreddy, N. (2024). Semiotic functions of indexicality. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 7(5), 2453–2467. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V7-i5-05

Fauzan, F. (2012). Akulturasi Islam dan budaya Jawa: Kajian pada ritual “Pengesahan” warga baru Persaudaraan Setia Hati Terate. Kalam, 6(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.24042/klm.v6i1.397

Foucault, M. (2014). Power/knowledge: Wacana kuasa/pengetahuan (Y. Santosa, Trans.). Narasi & Pustaka Promethea.

Frazer, J. G. (2013). The golden bough: A study in magic and religion (R. Fraser, Ed.; A new abridgement from the second and third editions). Oxford University Press.

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.

Giaccardi, E., & Palen, L. (2008). The social production of heritage through cross-media interaction: Making place for place-making. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 14(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250801953827

Gladden, M. E. (2019). Novel forms of “magical” human-computer interaction within the cyber-physical smart workplace: Implications for usability and user experience. International Journal of Research Studies in Management, 8(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsm.2019.4001

Harrison, R. (2015). Beyond “natural” and “cultural” heritage: Toward an ontological politics of heritage in the age of Anthropocene. Heritage & Society, 8(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1179/2159032X15Z.00000000036

Hasanah, L. U., & Andari, N. (2020). The social and cultural values transmission of an oral tradition. Indonesian Journal of Social Research, 2(3), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.30997/ijsr.v2i3.70

Helmon, S., & Rahardi, R. K. (2020). Local values preservation of Torok oral tradition through the education domain: Metaphorical ecolinguistics. Jurnal Gramatika, 6(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2020.v6i1.3941

Hermawan, H. (2025). Simbol-simbol magi dalam Waroge dan kaitannya dengan naskah Sewaka Darma. Jurnal Dinamika Ilmu Komunikasi, 11(1), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.32509/dinamika.v11i1.5570

Hulumudi, S. I., & Sukmayadi, Y. (2025). The existence of oral traditions in Indonesia: A study of pantun singing in the Gorontalo community. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v9i1.8812

Janse, H. (2019). Changes in gender roles within intangible cultural heritage: A survey of gender roles and gender restrictions within the Yama Hoko Yatai float festivals in Japan. Heritage, 2(3), 2090–2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage2030126

Janse, H. (2021). Intangible cultural heritage and societal gender structures: An interview study focusing on changes in gender roles and gender restrictions in Japanese float festivals. International Journal of Intangible Heritage, 16, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.35638/ijih.2021..16.006

Jelani, A. (2021). Interpreting human societies and social dynamics through multifaceted exploration of anthropological frameworks. Social Science Chronicle, 1(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.56106/ssc.2021.001

Jiménez-Bravo, M., & Marrero-Aguiar, V. (2024). Multimodal prosody: Gestures and speech in the perception of prominence in Spanish. Frontiers in Communication, 9, Article 1287363. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1287363

Karim, A., Raya, M. K. F., Mutholib, A., Kawakip, A. N., Retnanto, A., & Mukroji. (2023). Nyai Sabirah’s folklore and sacred local heritage in Central Java. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1), Article 2198629. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2198629

Keane, W. (2003). Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Language & Communication, 23(3–4), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00010-7

Keane, W. (2008). The evidence of the senses and the materiality of religion. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 14(S1), S110–S127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00496.x

Keesing, R. M., Crick, M., Frankel, B., Friedman, J., Hatch, E., Oosten, J. G., Pinxten, R., Rousseau, J., & Strathern, M. (1987). Anthropology as interpretive quest [Comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 28(2), 161–176. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2743185

Kiriama, H. O. (2017). Memory, identity and heritage on the south Kenya coast: The case of the Shimoni slave caves. Journal of African Cultural Heritage Studies, 1(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.22599/jachs.10

Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (2004). Intangible heritage as metacultural production. Museum International, 56(1–2), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00458.x

Kulsum, U. (2021). Stylistic analysis of Walter Savage Landor’s “Acon and Rhodope; or, Inconstantly.” Journal of English Education Program, 8(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.25157/(jeep).v8i1.5233

Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816

Lenzerini, F. (2011). Intangible cultural heritage: The living culture of peoples. European Journal of International Law, 22(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr006

Leva, V. A., Mtodagme, T. S., & Peace, N. V. (2017). Nonverbal communication as a key feature of the Nigerian print advertising text. International Journal of Information and Communication Sciences, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijics.20170201.11

Li, J., Krishnamurthy, S., Pereira Roders, A., & van Wesemael, P. (2020). Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices. Cities, 96, Article 102476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102476

Maharani, D. (2018). The tale tells: Revealing Madurese’s sacred cultural values behind Madura’s folktale entitled Asal Mula Sombher Tenggun. Lakon: Jurnal Kajian Sastra dan Budaya, 7(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.20473/lakon.v7i1.19717

Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 296–336). K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.

Martínez, M.-A. (2024). Imagining emotions in storyworlds: Physiological narrated perception and emotional mental imagery. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 18, Article 1336286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1336286

Meighan, P. J. (2021). Decolonizing the digital landscape: The role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 17(3), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801211037672

Mingers, J., & Willcocks, L. (2023). Towards a methodology for semiotics research. In The semiotics of information systems: A research methodology for the digital age (pp. 193–213). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34299-8_8

Muthalib, K. A., Fitrisia, D., & Zahara, N. (2024). Ceremonial language and social cohesion: An analysis of Seumapa in Acehnese wedding traditions. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(2), 1231–1247. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i2.29512

Nnyagu, U., Ozoh, N. J., & Umeh, D. (2024). The inter-ethnic folklore: An appraisal of the areas of affinity in Igbo and Yoruba customary lore. South Asian Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 56–60. https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjhss.2024.v06i01.008

Nurgiyantoro, B. (2013). Teori pengkajian fiksi (2nd ed.). Gadjah Mada University Press.

Nursalam, N., Santoso, A., Basuki, I. A., Laia, A., Sinamo, C. B., & Prastio, B. (2024). Exploration of symbolic meanings: A semiotic study of Kelong oral literature performance in Makassar society. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), Article 2439660. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2439660

Ọláwálé, H. (2021). Traditional songs of Ìlọrin: Enacting identities, history, and cultural memories. Yoruba Studies Review, 5(1.2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.32473/ysr.v5i1.2.130120

Pradopo, R. D. (2014). Pengkajian puisi: Analisis strata norma dan analisis struktural dan semiotik. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Pratita, I. I., Parastuti, & Roni. (2022). Japanese nature-themed imagery in haiku by Matsuo Basho: Stylistic studies. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2021 (IJCAH 2021) (pp. 217–220). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211223.039

Precillia, M. (2024). Oral tradition: The role of folklore in preserving the cultural identity of Kumun Debai Subdistrict. Ekspresi Seni: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Karya Seni, 26(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.26887/ekspresi.v26i2.4306

Putri, N. Q. H., Andayani, A., & Wardani, N. E. (2023). Representation of cultural values in Tempuutn Senarikng of the Dayak Benuaq and Tunjung tribes. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 79(1), Article a8091. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8091

Radermacher, M. (2024). Texts and images as data in qualitative social research: Proposing a common methodological approach. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241233170

Rahman, F., & Letlora, P. S. (2018). Cultural preservation: Rediscovering the endangered oral tradition of Maluku, a case study of Kapata of Central Maluku. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.2p.91

Rahmawati. (2014). Pakkiok Bunting dalam adat perkawinan suku Makassar di Gowa: Kajian nilai budaya. Kandai, 10(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.26499/jk.v10i1.314

Redondo, S. G., Rodríguez Higuera, C. J., Coca, J. R., & Olteanu, A. (2024). Transhumanism, society and education: An edusemiotic approach. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 43(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-024-09927-6

Rosadi, K., Fitrinaldi, Herianto, B., Mariono, Syafitriyandy, Irawan, D., & Abdulhajar, E. (2024). The dynamics of social criticism in the lyrics of the song “Bangau Oh Bangau”: A study of Malay cultural values in the Riau Islands. SHS Web of Conferences, 205, Article 02014. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420502014

Saragih, E., Chaldun, W., Sumbayak, D. M., Girsang, B. M., Parlindungan, & Purba, A. (2025). Umpasa as an oral tradition in Simalungun society: From the perspective of communication ethnography. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(4), 1146–1155. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1504.13

Sikki, M., & Nasruddin. (1995). Puisi-puisi Makassar. Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23(3–4), 193–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2

Sofiyev, K. (2022). Principal contributions of the semiotic-structural approach in culturology. Path of Science, 8(4), 4001–4006. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.80-4

Spano, I., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Indigenous data sovereignty in intangible cultural heritage governance: A complementary approach to public–private partnerships. International Journal of Cultural Property, 32(2), 167–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739125100064

Stasch, R. (2011). Ritual and oratory revisited: The semiotics of effective action. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145623

Sulistyorini, D. (2024). Mitos masyarakat terhadap ritual di Candi Songgoriti sebagai warisan pengetahuan budaya lokal. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 7(Special issue), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v7iSp.Iss.946

Syam, C., Olendo, Y. O., Dewantara, J. A., & Rahmani, E. (2024). Oral literature and the social identity of the Dayak Kanayatn: The extinction of oral literature amid contemporary cultural trends. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), Article 2376785. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2376785

Syamsurijal, & Fajrin R, H. (2020). Pakkiok Bunting penyambutan pengantin dalam suku Makassar: Analisis Albert Parry Lord [Pakkiok Bunting groom welcoming in the Makassar tribe: Albert Parry Lord analysis]. Kibas Cenderawasih, 17(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.26499/kc.v17i2.263

Tangherlini, T. R. (2003). “Oral tradition” in a technologically advanced world. Oral Tradition, 18(1), 136–138. https://doi.org/10.1353/ort.2004.0001

Tennell, C., & Chew, K. A. B. (2024). Perspectives on relationality in online Indigenous language learning. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 20(3), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801241261699

Tidball, K. G. (2014). Seeing the forest for the trees: Hybridity and social-ecological symbols, rituals and resilience in postdisaster contexts. Ecology and Society, 19(4), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06903-190425

Turner, V. (1975). Symbolic studies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 4, 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.04.100175.001045

Uherek, Z. (2001). Ladislav Holý and Ernest Gellner: Representatives of two incompatible approaches to the study of Central European society? Czech Sociological Review, 9(2), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2001.37.12.16

van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006

Wagner, A., & de Clippele, M.-S. (2023). Safeguarding cultural heritage in the digital era: A critical challenge. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 36, 1915–1923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10040-z

Waterton, E., & Smith, L. (2010). The recognition and misrecognition of community heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1–2), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441671

Wulan, D. A. (2024). Perwujudan nilai sosial dan pelestarian budaya dalam ritual bersih desa Tlogomas Malang: Tinjauan antropolinguistik. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 7(4), 673–682. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v7i4.1067

Yunindyawati, Lidya, E., & Azni, U. S. (2024). Reactivating the oral literary cultural tradition in the rural area “Tembang Batanghari Sembilan” in South Sumatra Province, Indonesia: Current situation and initiatives. International Journal of Religion, 5(10), 1693–1700. https://doi.org/10.61707/7cdjp254

Zahra, F., Hakim, M. N., Wibowo, A. M., & Istiyani, D. (2024). The role of Jepuro inter-ethnic cemeteries in religious moderation: Global sociological and anthropological perspectives. Social and Education History, 13(3), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.17583/hse.15015

Zulfa, Z., Suraya, R. S., & Wahyuni, Y. S. (2025). The role of oral tradition in character formation: A case study of Mo’odulele poems in Rawa Lopa, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 8(1), 625–631. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i1-78

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

Critical Semiotics of Pakkiok Bunting  Poem in Makassar Oral Tradition. (2026). REiLA : Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 8(2), 213-234. https://doi.org/10.31849/a3c15p44