Nominalization Patterns in Tombatu Language: A Generative Morphological Analysis of Affixal Noun Formation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31849/prbf9s30Keywords:
Nominalization, Tombatu language, Generative morphology, Austronesian linguistics , Minahasan languages, Morphological rulesAbstract
Regional languages preserve complex grammatical systems that reveal how communities organize experience, identity, and cultural knowledge. However, nominalization in Tombatu, an underdescribed Austronesian language of Minahasa, has not been systematically examined through an explicit rule-based morphological framework. This study addresses this gap by investigating the structural patterns, semantic functions, and generative mechanisms of affixal noun formation in Tombatu. Employing a descriptive-taxonomic design, data were collected over six months in Tombatu Village from proficient speakers through naturally occurring speech, elicitation, recording, note-taking, and informant validation. The final dataset found unique nominalized forms. These forms were classified into three major processes comprising 11 noun-forming prefixes, one noun-forming suffix, and 14 affix combinations, yielding 26 identified affixal configurations. The analysis applied Word Combination Rules, Derivation Rules, the Boundary Insertion Convention, and relevant morphological constraints. The findings show that prefixation exhibits the greatest structural and semantic variation in the dataset, producing agentive, person-denoting, instrumental, object-related, and result-related nouns. For example, /tapə-/ combines with /lukuʔ/ ‘to drink’ to form /tapəlukuʔ/ [tapəlukuʔ] ‘drinker’. Suffixation is more restricted, with /-an/ forming locative nouns, as in /tawoi/ ‘to work’ plus /-an/, which produces /tawoian/ [tawoian] ‘workplace’. Complex affix combinations form nouns denoting places, processes, objects, states, results, and entities. This study provides the first systematic generative account of Tombatu nominalization, expands empirical evidence for Austronesian word formation, strengthens regional-language documentation, and offers a linguistic basis for language maintenance and potential contrastive morphological activities in multilingual education.
References
Aldridge, E. (2021). Two types of alignment change in nominalizations: Austronesian and Japanese. Diachronica, 38(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.19044.ald
Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/412595
Austin, P. K. (2010). Current issues in language documentation. Language Documentation and Description, 7, 12–33. https://doi.org/10.25894/ldd225
Beguš, G., & Dąbkowski, M. (2025). The origins of the Austronesian voice system and subject-only restriction [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/c9765_v2
Beguš, G., Dąbkowski, M., & Drummond, E. (2023). The origins of the Austronesian voice system and subject-only restriction [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/c9765
Bromham, L. (2023). Language endangerment: Using analytical methods from conservation biology to illuminate loss of linguistic diversity. Cambridge Prisms: Extinction, 1, Article e3. https://doi.org/10.1017/ext.2022.3
Bromham, L., Dinnage, R., Skirgård, H., Ritchie, A., Cardillo, M., Meakins, F., Greenhill, S., & Hua, X. (2022). Global predictors of language endangerment and the future of linguistic diversity. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 6(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01604-y
Brook, M., & Blamire, E. (2023). Language play is language variation: Quantitative evidence and what it implies about language change. Language, 99(3), 491–530. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2023.a907010
Caruana, S. (2023). -ata nominalisations in Maltese: A language contact perspective. Atti del Sodalizio Glottologico Milanese, 16, 17–39. https://doi.org/10.54103/1972-9901/20526
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2025). The potential of pedagogical translanguaging in English language and in English-medium content classes. Linguistics and Education, 86, Article 101399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2025.101399
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009
Deda, A., & Hoshafi, M. (2023). Word formation head and the typology analysis of the word formation corpus in Albanian. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(6), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0162
Eleshin, B. (2021). Typology of headedness in Yorùbá nominal derivations. Journal of Universal Language, 22(1), 91–125. https://doi.org/10.22425/jul.2021.22.1.91
Goodman, B., & Tastanbek, S. (2021). Making the shift from a codeswitching to a translanguaging lens in English language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 55(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.571
Gosal, N., Manangkot, V. E., & Liuw, J. K. (2023). Verbalization of Tombatu language. In R. H. E. Sendouw, T. Pangalila, S. Pasandaran, & V. P. Rantung (Eds.), Proceedings of the Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022) (Vol. 698, pp. 1517–1523). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.571
Gosal, N., Manangkot, V. E., & Liuw, J. K. (2023). Verbalization of Tombatu language. In Proceedings of the Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022) (pp. 1517–1523). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-35-0_182
Gromann, D., Apostol, E.-S., Chiarcos, C., Cremaschi, M., Gracia, J., Gkirtzou, K., Liebeskind, C., Mockienė, L., Rosner, M., Schuurman, I., Sérasset, G., Silvano, P., Spahiu, B., Truică, C.-O., Utka, A., & Valūnaitė Oleškevičienė, G. (2024). Multilinguality and LLOD: A survey across linguistic description levels. Semantic Web, 15(5), 1915–1958. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-243591
Haude, K. (2023). Movima. In P. Epps & L. Michael (Eds.), Amazonian languages: Language isolates II: Kanoé to Yurakaré: An international handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 807–850). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110432732-004
Hemmings, C. (2020). Methods in language documentation and description: A guide to the Kelabit documentation project. Journal of Modern Languages, 30(1), 6–76. https://doi.org/10.22452/jml.vol30no1.1
Hidayati, A. F., Nurhayani, I., & Choyimah, N. (2021). Madurese deverbal nominalization process. Prosodi, 15(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.21107/prosodi.v15i2.12177
Hockett, C. F. (1965). A course in modern linguistics. Macmillan. https://a.co/d/0d6MBSVE
Jufrizal, J., & Refnita, L. (2021). Gerund in English: A morpho-semantic note for EFL learners in Indonesia. Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa, 15(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v15i2.114512
Jufrizal, J., Refnita, L., & Arianto, M. A. (2024). Ergative and antipassive construction in Minangkabaunese: Are there? Linguistik Indonesia, 42(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v42i1.585
Kalangi, F. J. (1984). Menapak bahasa daerah Toundanow di Minahasa Sulawesi Utara tentang fonologi dan morfologi [Unpublished manuscript].
Katamba, F. (1993). Morphology. Macmillan Press.
Kaufman, D. (2026). A global view on the Ausrichtungsaffix and the deep differences between nominalization-derived versus applicative-derived diathesis in Austronesian. In S. Riesberg, U. Reinöhl, & B. Hellwig (Eds.), The documentarist turn: From observable linguistic behaviour to typological generalizations (pp. 518–571). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.240.20kau
Keraf, G. (1990). Linguistik bandingan tipologis. Gramedia.
Keraf, G. (1991). Linguistik bandingan historis. Gramedia.
Kim, Y. (2020). Morphology and language documentation. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.518
Klamer, M. (2020). From Lamaholot to Alorese: Morphological loss in adult language contact. In D. Gil & A. Schapper (Eds.), Austronesian undressed: How and why languages become isolating (pp. 339–367). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.129.07kla
Klamer, M. (2020). From Lamaholot to Alorese: Morphological loss in adult language contact. In D. Gil & A. Schapper (Eds.), Austronesian undressed: How and why languages become isolating (pp. 339–368). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.129.07kla
Koenig, J.-P., & Michelson, K. (2020). What does being a noun or a verb mean? Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 106–126. https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2020.6
Kolbusz-Buda, J. (2024). Between compounding and phrasal derivation: Polish complex nouns in sam(o)-. Word Structure, 17(3), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2024.0240
Krauska, A., & Lau, E. (2023). Moving away from lexicalism in psycho- and neuro-linguistics. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 2, Article 1125127. https://doi.org/10.3389/flang.2023.1125127
Kridalaksana, H. (1984). Kamus linguistik. Gramedia.
Kridalaksana, H. (1992). Pembentukan kata dalam bahasa Indonesia. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Krohn, H. S. (2021). Indonesian vs. Bribri: Striking lexical similarities in two unrelated languages. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24036/jbs.v9i1.111535
Lapoliwa, H. (1981). A generative approach to the phonology of Bahasa Indonesia (Pacific Linguistics, Series D, No. 34). Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University. https://doi.org/10.25501/SOAS.00029045
Li, L.-Z., & Yang, T. (2020). A cognitive study of nominalization in Mandarin. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 10(9), 835–847. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5836/2020.09.013
Lumbantobing, A. B., & Situngkir, H. (2026). Tokenizations for Austronesian language models: Study on languages in Indonesia Archipelago [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.06998
Lupyan, G., & Dale, R. (2021). Why are there different languages? The role of adaptation in linguistic diversity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.005
Luuk, E. (2019). A type-theoretical reduction of morphological, syntactic and semantic compositionality to a single level of description. In R. Mitkov & G. Angelova (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2019) (pp. 664–673). INCOMA Ltd. https://doi.org/10.26615/978-954-452-056-4_078
Lyons, J. (1995). Pengantar teori linguistik (I. Soetikno, Trans.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama. (Original work published 1968).
Martinet, A. (1980). Éléments de linguistique générale. Armand Colin.
Missud, A., & Villoing, F. (2020). The morphology of rival -ion, -age, and -ment selected verbal bases. Lexique, (26), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.54563/lexique.755
Mitrović, M., & Panagiotidis, P. E. (2020). Adjectives exist, adjectivisers do not: A bicategorial typology. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1), Article 58, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.940
Naudé, J. A., & Miller-Naudé, C. L. (2023). Generative linguistics as a theoretical framework for the explanation of problematic constructions in Biblical Hebrew. In W. A. Ross & E. Robar (Eds.), Linguistic theory and the biblical text (pp. 6–66). Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0358.01
Nida, E. A. (1970). Morphology: The descriptive analysis of words. University of Michigan Press.
Njobvu, N. (2020). Two types of phrasal compound in Cinyanja [Doctoral dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal]. ResearchSpace.
Pike, K. L. (1992). Konsep linguistik (K. Gunawan, Trans.). Gelora Aksara Pratama.
Pons, M.-C. (2021). [Review of the book The Dura language: Grammar and phylogeny, by N. Schorer]. Himalayan Linguistics, 20(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.5070/H920155279
Prilutskaya, M. (2021). Examining pedagogical translanguaging: A systematic review of the literature. Languages, 6(4), Article 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6040180
Robins, R. H. (1992). Linguistik umum: Sebuah pengantar (S. Djajanegara, Trans.). Kanisius.
Ross, M., & Zeitoun, E. (2024). Formosan languages and Proto-Austronesian morphology. In P. J.-K. Li, E. Zeitoun, & R. De Busser (Eds.), Handbook of Formosan languages: The indigenous languages of Taiwan (Part 2, pp. 134–182). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/2772_5766_COM-103030
Salem, V. E. T., & Mesra, R. (2020). Preservation of local language culture in Toundanouw Village, Southeast Minahasa Regency. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS 2020) (pp. 175–177). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201014.039
Samsuri. (1987). Aliran transformasi 1957–1965. Lembaga Bahasa Universitas Katolik Atma Jaya.
Schapper, A. (2020). Introduction to The Papuan languages of Timor, Alor and Pantar: Volume 3. In A. Schapper (Ed.), The Papuan languages of Timor, Alor and Pantar: Volume 3: Sketch grammars (pp. 1–52). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511158-001
Sneddon, J. N. (1978). Proto-Minahasan: Phonology, morphology, and wordlist (Pacific Linguistics, Series B, No. 54). Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University. https://doi.org/10.15144/PL-B54.1
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa: Pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistis. Duta Wacana University Press.
Sudiroatmadja, M. H. (1992). Javanese word formation: A generative grammar approach [Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University].
Suhandano. (2021). Actor and patient in Javanese and Indonesian imperative clauses. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Indonesian Linguistics Society (KIMLI 2021) (pp. 99–106). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211226.022
Takau, L. G. (2023). A grammar of Nese. ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/GN.2023
Ulhaq, H. D., Suryana, Y., Asikin, N. A., & Fadhly, F. Z. (2022). A morpho-syntactic error analysis of university students’ argumentative writing. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 5(2), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v5i2.6844
Verhaar, J. W. M. (2001). Asas-asas linguistik. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Wu, J. (2022). [Review of the book Austronesian undressed: How and why languages become isolating, edited by D. Gil & A. Schapper]. Oceanic Linguistics, 61(2), 791–796. https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2022.0026
Yun, S., Choi, S. S., Olğun-Baytaş, M., Lyu, S. R., & La Croix, L. (2025). Enhancing learning for emergent bi/multilingual children through translanguaging pedagogies: A systematic literature review from 2010 to 2023. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14639491251338422
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Verra Ellen Manangkot, Jola Kristiani Liuw, Lucky Herliawan Yanuarsyah Amalputra, Metty Ribka Manila, Fergina Lengkoan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


