Analysis of EFL Teaching in Pakistan: Method and Strategies in the Postmethod Era

  • Muhammad Asif Ali Khan Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Canada
Keywords: English as a Foreign Language, Teaching method, Teaching strategies

Abstract

This study investigates the teaching methods and strategies practised in Pakistan to teach English as a foreign language in the Post-method Era. English language pedagogy in Pakistan has taken a new turn since the establishment of higher education commission and applied linguistic departments in many universities in Pakistan. It focuses on classroom teaching analysis to see what teaching methods and strategies that English language educators in private and public institutes apply. The study applied qualitative methods with five English teachers as Foreign Language (EFL) of the public and private sectors' intermediate level. The participating teachers were given nine open-ended survey questions about the nature of language, language teaching methods, classroom strategies and techniques, and their roles as teachers in the classroom. Findings revealed that EFL teachers in both public and private sectors employ multiple teaching methods and techniques in their classroom practice, rather than holding to one particular method. The data also differentiates teaching methods and strategies of the teachers in the both sectors. Interestingly, it appears that EFL teachers in the private sectors seem to aim at communicative teaching approaches. In contrast, teachers in the public sectors are more inclined to use Grammar Translation Methods (GTM).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrejo, B., Sartaj, S., & Memon, S. (2019). English Language Teaching through Communicative Approach: A Qualitative Study of Public Sector Colleges of Hyderabad, Sindh. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(5), 43-49.

Ahmad, I., & Arif, M. S. (2020). Teachers' Perception of English Language Teaching at Tertiary Level Education in Pakistan. Pakistan Social Science Review, 4 (1), 191-203.

Ahmed, M., & Shah, S. K. (2013). The Relationship in Culture and ELT: The Representation of Aesthetic Sense Culture in “Oxford Progressive English”. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(4), 150-158

Ahmad, S., & Rao, C. (2013). Applying the communicative approach in teaching English as a foreign language: a case study of Pakistan, Porta Linguarum, 20, 187-203.

Akbari, R. (2008). Postmethod discourse and practice. TESOL quarterly, 42(4), 641-652.

Almaktary, H. M. A., & Al-Kadi, A. M. T. (2017). CALL in Post-Method Era. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 2(2), 133-146.

Asghar, J., & Butt, M. I. (2018). A Critique of National Curriculum for English Language in Pakistan: Proposing Cognitive Strategy Instruction for ELT. Kashmir Journal of Language Research, 21(1), 75-86.

Bell, D. M. (2003). Method and postmethod: Are they really so incompatible? TESOL quarterly, 37(2), 325-336.

Buriro, G. A., Abdullah, M., & Mehdi, M. (2018). A Critical Analysis of ELT Syllabus at Secondary Level in Pakistan. Grassroots, 51(2), 345-358

Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). Globalisation, methods, and practice in periphery classrooms. Globalisation and language teaching, 134-150.

Ghulamullah, D. M. (2017) Factors Affecting First Language Acquisition. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Translation Studies, 4(2), 481-487

Gulzar, M. A., & Sultana, N. (2009). Shift in the Language Teaching Methods: Implications of the Methodologies in Pakistani EFL Classrooms. Kashmir Journal of Language Research, 11(1), 121-130.

Islam, N. N. (2020). Implementation of Postmethod Pedagogy as an Alternative to Communicative Language Teaching at the Tertiary Level Education. IJOLTL-TL Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics, 5(3), 135-154. DOI: 10.30957/ijotl-tl.v5i3.633.

Warsi, J. (2004). Conditions under which English is taught in Pakistan: An applied linguistic perspective. Sarid Journal, 1(1), 1-9.

Jamil, S. (2014). Critical Perspective in English Language Teaching in Pakistan: the Possibilities. Gomal University Journal of Research, 30(2), 11-18.

Khan, A., & Akhtar, M. (2017). Investigating the Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Method on Teaching of English Grammar. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(1), 1-16.

Khaliq, A., Ali, A., & Hanan, F. (2019). ELT Teachers’ Attitude towards Language Learning Strategies Used in Southern Punjab, Pakistan. Global Regional Review, 4(1), 271-280.

Khan, T. (2016, August 25). English Language Teaching in Pakistan. Retrieved from http://www.dawn.com/news/663605/english-language-teaching-in-pakistan.

Khattak, I & Abbasi, G. (2010). Teachers’ Professional Development in ELT at Tertiary Level: ELTR Project of the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan, 10(6), 153-167

Khatun, M. S. (2018). The Role of EFL/ESL Teachers’ Idiosyncratic Knowledge Base in Their Professional Development in the Postmethod Premise. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 8(3), 422-436.

Kramsch, C., Cain, A., & Murphy‐Lejeune, E. (1996). Why should language teachers teach culture?. Language, culture and curriculum, 9(1), 99-107.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. Yale University Press.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Routledge.

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching 3rd edition-Oxford Handbooks for Language Teachers. Oxford university press.

Mitchell, C. B., & Vidal, K. E. (2001). Weighing the ways of the flow: Twentieth century language instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 85(1), 26-38.

Myles, F. (2010). The development of theories of second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 43(3), 320-332.

Panezai, S. G., & Channa, L. A. (2017). Pakistani government primary school teachers and the English textbooks of Grades 1–5: A mixed methods teachers’-led evaluation. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1269712.

Panhwar, A. H., Baloch, S., & Khan, S. (2017). Making communicative language teaching work in Pakistan. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(3), 226-234.

Soomro, M. A., Memon, N., &Memonc, S. A. (2016). Concept of Best Practices in English Language Teaching to Pakistani ELT Fraternity. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(4), 119-123.

Teevno, R. A. (2017). Challenges in teaching and learning of English at secondary level class X. Pakistan Journal of Language and Linguistics, 1(3), 35-43.

Warsi, J. (2004). Conditions under which English is taught in Pakistan: An applied linguistic perspective. Sarid Journal, 1(1), 1-9.

Yuliana, R., Marwa, M., & Hamuddin, B. (2020). The Investigation of Students’ Knowledge on a Novel Learning Strategy: What is Interesting about Blended Learning for EFL University Students?. Utamax: Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education, 2(2), 80-87.

Yuzar, E. (2020). Incorporating Communicative Competence in Assessment and English Language Teaching in Multilingual Settings. REiLA : Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 2(1), 8-13. DOI: 10.31849/reila.v2i1.3864

Zahra, T., & Abbas, A. (2018). Pedagogical Implications of Corpus-Based Approaches to ELT in Pakistan. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(2), 259-275.

Published
2020-12-26
How to Cite
Khan, M. A. A. (2020). Analysis of EFL Teaching in Pakistan: Method and Strategies in the Postmethod Era. REiLA : Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 2(3), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v2i3.4802
Abstract viewed = 651 times
PDF downloaded = 487 times