UPAYA HUKUM PENINJAUAN KEMBALI PERKARA KEPAILITAN BERDASAR PUTUSAN MAJELIS HAKIM TENTANG PERMOHONAN PKPU (TINJAUAN YURIDIS PUTUSAN HAKIM MA NO. 134-PK/Pdt.Sus Pailit/2016)
Abstract
As for the subject of the formulation of the problem in this journal article is regarding whether
the legal remedy for review of the decision on the PKPU application in decision N0.
13/PKPU/2015/PN Niaga Sby is in accordance with the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU. The
method used is normative juridical. Based on the results of the research, it was found that the
judicial review was not in accordance with the Bankruptcy and PKPU Laws because it had
exceeded the specified time limit, namely 180 days after the date of the decision being filed for a
permanent legal review. This means that the application for review submitted is around 184 days since it has permanent legal force.
Downloads
References
Harahap, M. Yahya. 2015. Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hartini, Rahayu. 2017. Hukum Kepailitan: Berdasarkan UU No. 37 Tahun 2014 Tentang
Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Malang: UMM Press.
Shubhan, M. Hadi. 2008. Hukum Kepailitan Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan.
Jakarta: Kencana.
Soemitro, Ronny Hanitijo. 1999. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta:
Ghalia Indonesia.
Sutedi, Adrian. 2009. Hukum Kepailitan, Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Yani, Ahmad dan Gunawan Widjaja. 2002. Seri Hukum Bisnis Kepailitan. Jakarta: PT Raja
Grafindo Persada.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Republik Indonesia. 2004. Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan
Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Sekretariat Negara Jakarta
Copyright (c) 2023 Farida Sofa Farida
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Respublica is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
