Analisis dan Rekonstruksi Pengaturan Sanksi Etik Ideal Bagi Advokat Terpidana (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 176PK/Pid.Sus/2017)

Authors

  • Charles Leonard Moniaga Universitas Brawijaya
  • Henry Maraden Limbong
  • Andre Falih Darari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31849/respublica.v24i01.23423

Keywords:

Advocate, Corruption, Code of ethics, Officium nobile, Bribe

Abstract

Corruption is a serious problem in Indonesia that needs to be eradicated through law enforcement. However, law enforcers have contributed to corruption, including advocates, such as OC Kaligis, who was found guilty of bribing judges at the Medan State Administrative Court. However, his actions have never been subject to ethical sanctions until now. Therefore, this article examines two issues. First, what is the ideal ethical sanction for advocates convicted of corruption in the perspective of the advocate code of ethics? Second, how should the regulation in the advocate code of ethics be related to ethical sanctions for convicted advocates so that the honour of the advocate profession as officium nobile remains protected? This research is a normative legal research with statute approach, case approach and conceptual approach. The results show that the ideal ethical sanction for advocates convicted of corruption is permanent dismissal from the advocate professional organization. Arrangements related to ethical sanctions for convicted advocates in the advocate code of ethics are still weak so they need to be reconstructed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aprita, Serlika. Etika Profesi Hukum. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2020.
Pancasilawati, Abnan. Konsep Hukum Anti Korupsi. Palembang: Bening Media Publising, 2022.
Shalihah, Fithriatus. Etika dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Total Media, 2019.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Marzuki, Suparman. Etika & Kode Etik Profesi Hukum. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2017.
Waluyo, Bambang. Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Strategi dan Optimalisasi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.
Wibowo, Sunarno Edy. Kode Etik Advokat Indonesia. Surabaya: Narotama University Press, 2016.
Dafiah, Nadya Intan. “Analisa Yuridis Kasus OC Kaligis Terpidana Di Hubungkan dengan Kode Etik Advokat Terkait Sanksi”. Studi Kritis Hukum dan Masyarakat 1, No. 1 (2024): 1-9. https://journal.psikis.org/index.php/skhm/article/download/41/36.
Daryanti, Silvia, Nyoman Serikat PJ dan Purwoto. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Advokat Pelaku Tindak Pidana Suap Terhadap Hakim (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1319K/Pid.Sus/2016)”. Diponegoro Law Journal 6, No. 2 (2017): 1-15, https://www.neliti.com/publications/177942/pertanggungjawaban-pidana-advokat-pelaku-tindak-pidana-suap-terhadap-hakim-studi.
Harmoko. “Kode Etik Profesi Advokat Dalam Menjaga Eksistensi Advokat Sebagai Profesi Terhormat (Officium Nobile)”. Jurnal IUS 10, No. 2 (2022): 189. https://doi.org/10.51747/ius.v10i2.1155.
Octaviani, Mita. “Prosedur Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Kode Etik Profesi Advokat Oleh Dewan Kehormatan Organisasi Peradi Kota Medan”, Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum 1, No. 4 (2021): 1-12. http://jurnalmahasiswa.umsu.ac.id/index.php/jimhum.
Pratama, Iqbal Yudha, Miswar Nasution, dan Fauziah Lubis, “Urgensi Penegakan Hukum Terkait Kejahatan Tindak Pidana Suap Dalam Etika Profesi Advokat”. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga 5, No. 3 (2023): 582-601. https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v5i2.2790.
Prawira, M Deni, Safitri Wikan dan Masrudi Muchtar. “Pemidanaan Terhadap Advokat Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Putusan Nomor 176PK/Pid.Sus/2017)”. SULTAN ADAM: Jurnal Hukum Dan Sosial 1, No. 2 (2023): 213-222. http://qjurnal.my.id/index.php/sultanadam/article/view/442.
Purnomo, Agus. “Etika Profesi Advokat Sebagai Upaya Pengawasan Dalam Menjalankan Fungsi Advokat Sebagai Penegak Hukum”. DIH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 12, No. 24 (2016): 136-148. https://www.neliti.com/publications/371342/etika-profesi-advokat-sebagai-upaya-pengawasan-dalam-menjalankan-fungsi-advokat.
Saifullah, Huda dan Aryo Fadlian. "Analisis Praktik Korupsi Gubernur Provinsi Papua Lukas Enembe dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi". Jurnal Hukum Respublica Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lancang Kuning 23, No. 2 (2024): 77-88, https://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/Respublica/article/view/17086/6430.
Alwin, Mhd, Ahmad Irpan, dan Fauziah Lubis. “Urgensi Kode Etik Profesi Advokat”. El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat 3, No. 3 (2023): 716-721. 10.47467/elmujtama.v3i3.2929.
Aryan, Muhammad Hanafi. “OC Kaligis Kini Jadi Pengacara Bela Lukas Enembe”. DetikNews. 28 September, 2024. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6525891/oc-kaligis-kini-jadi-pengacara-bela-lukas-enembe.
Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. “Ragam Bahasa Peraturan Perundang-Undangan”. 23 September, 2021. https://pusdik.mkri.id/materi/materi_241_9.%20Teknik%20Penyusunan%20Peraturan%20Perundang-undangan%20Bagian%20III.pdf.
“Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia VI Daring”. Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. Diakses 30 September, 2024. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/.
Maharani, Esthi. “Begini Kronologis Suap OC Kaligis”. Republika. Diakses 28 September, 2024. https://news.republika.co.id/berita/ntxxha335/begini-kronologis-suap-oc-kaligis.
“Penindakan”. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Diakses 28 September, 2024. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/publikasi-data/statistik/penindakan-2.
Putri, Zunita. “Perjalanan Kasus OC Kaligis Hingga Dapat Cuti Jelang Bebas”. DetikNews. 28 September, 2024. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5991087/perjalanan-kasus-oc-kaligis-hingga-dapat-cuti-jelang-bebas.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-10

How to Cite

Analisis dan Rekonstruksi Pengaturan Sanksi Etik Ideal Bagi Advokat Terpidana (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 176PK/Pid.Sus/2017). (2024). Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 24(01). https://doi.org/10.31849/respublica.v24i01.23423