EVALUASI KESIAPAN SEKOLAH LUAR BIASA DI PROVINSI RIAU DALAM MENGINTEGRASIKAN TEKNOLOGI PEMBELAJARAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL CIPP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31849/9kg0y122Keywords:
CIPP Model, Special Education, Learning Technology, Readiness Evaluation, InclusivityAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the readiness of Special Schools (SLB) in Riau Province to integrate learning technologies using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model. The research employed a mixed-methods approach with an explanatory sequential design. Data were collected through surveys from nine SLBs, complemented by interviews and observations. Findings indicate that the readiness level is moderately to highly satisfactory. The Product dimension recorded the highest effectiveness (mean = 4.22), demonstrating that technology improves inclusivity and student motivation. However, Input and Context dimensions show challenges related to infrastructure and external support (mean = 3.11). There are significant disparities among schools, particularly in policy implementation and facility distribution. The study recommends prioritizing infrastructure equalization, establishing national policy standards for technological integration in SLB, and enhancing teacher training toward adaptive pedagogy
References
UNESCO, The {Salamanca} {Statement} and {Framework} for {Action} on {Special} {Needs} {Education}. Paris: UNESCO, 1994.
[2] P. R. Indonesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. Indonesia, 2016.
[3] A. Munandar, S. Soleha, M. Wardani, W. Weni, and S. S. Azra, “Evaluasi Program Pembinaan Minat Bakat Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus di Sekolah Luar Biasa Prof. Dr. Sri Soedewi Kota Jambi,” J. Syntax Admiration, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 5799–5813, 2024.
[4] M. Ainscow, R. Slee, and M. Best, “The Salamanca statement: 25 years on,” International Journal of inclusive education, vol. 23, no. 7–8. Taylor & Francis, pp. 671–676, 2019.
[5] S. Nurhadipa, P. L. Ratna, N. Ulhasanah, and O. Andriani, “Tantangan Pendidikan Inklusi Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundangan Di Indonesia,” CENDEKIA J. Ilmu Sos. Bhs. dan Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 160–164, 2024.
[6] R. N. Ramadhana, “Tantangan Pendidikan Inklusi Dalam Mendidik Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus,” 2020.
[7] Y. Elsahar, S. Hu, K. Bouazza-Marouf, D. Kerr, and A. Mansor, “Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) advances: A review of configurations for individuals with a speech disability,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 8, p. 1911, 2019.
[8] J. Quintero, S. Baldiris, R. Rubira, J. Cerón, and G. Velez, “Augmented reality in educational inclusion. A systematic review on the last decade,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, p. 1835, 2019.
[9] L. Bryant and B. Hemsley, “Augmented reality: a view to future visual supports for people with disability,” Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 800–813, 2024.
[10] N. A. Kalugina and T. V Borzova, “Digital technologies aimed at the development of personal and professional readiness in the work of teachers in inclusive education,” in International Scientific and Practical Conference on Digital Economy (ISCDE 2019), 2019, pp. 296–301.
[11] E. Sutrisno, M. S. Silitonga, R. R. Yusuf, and A. A. Nugroho, “Digital divide: how is Indonesian public service affected?,” JPPI (Jurnal Penelit. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 454–463, 2024.
[12] O. W. Purbo, “Narrowing the digital divide,” Digit. Indones. Connect. Divergence, pp. 75–92, 2017.
[13] K. Onitsuka, B. Hidayat, and S. Yamaguchi, “ICT in Rural Schools: Infrastructure Challenges in Developing Regions,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 2173–2190, 2018.
[14] I. Gemiharto and H. E. N. Priyadarshani, “The challenges of the digital divide in the online learning process during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia,” Ilomata Int. J. Manag., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–30, 2022.
[15] D. L. Stufflebeam, The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University, 1971.
[16] D. L. Stufflebeam and G. Zhang, The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Springer, 2017.
[17] M. Fullan, Leading in a culture of change. John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
[18] J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2018.
[19] A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010.
[20] D. Nurhadipa, N. Putri, and F. Rahman, “Barriers in Implementing Inclusive Education in Indonesia,” Asian J. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 45–59, 2024.
[21] K. Hakan and F. Seval, “Evaluation of the CIPP Model in Educational Research,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 526–531, 2011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ZONAsi: Jurnal Sistem Informasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-SA 4.0
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
