KOMPARASI FUZZY USE CASE POINT DAN ADVANCE USE CASE POINT UNTUK ESTIMASI PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT LUNAK

Authors

  • Usup Suparma Universitas Gunadarma
  • Edi Sukirman Universitas Gunadarma
  • Hustinawati Universitas Gunadarma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31849/axe41k76

Keywords:

Upaya Perangkat Lunak, Use Case Point, Fuzzy Use UCP, Advance UCP, ASSIST

Abstract

Ketidakakuratan estimasi upaya (effort) pengembangan perangkat lunak pada proyek mobile enterprise sering kali disebabkan oleh kompleksitas non-fungsional dan subjektivitas penilaian faktor teknis. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi akurasi metode Fuzzy Use Case Point (FUCP) dan Advance Use Case Point (AUCP) dengan studi kasus aplikasi ASSIST pada PT. Astana Kinaya Mitratama. Masalah utama yang diangkat adalah efek batas diskrit (cliff effect) pada kategori Use Case Point (UCP) konvensional yang sering menghasilkan estimasi bias. Metode FUCP menggunakan logika fuzzy Mamdani untuk menghaluskan klasifikasi bobot, sementara AUCP menambahkan dimensi End User Development (EUD). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa FUCP menghasilkan estimasi sebesar 1.746 jam (MRE 6,59%), sedangkan AUCP sebesar 2.159,46 jam (MRE 31,84%) terhadap effort aktual 1.638 jam. FUCP terbukti lebih presisi karena mampu memetakan jumlah transaksi secara kontinu, sementara AUCP menghasilkan overestimation akibat multiplikator EUD yang tidak relevan dengan karakteristik proyek mobile enterprise terpusat. Kontribusi penelitian ini adalah validasi empiris keunggulan logika fuzzy dalam memitigasi kesalahan estimasi pada domain aplikasi mobile di Indonesia.

References

[1] T. B. Bono and A. S. M. Lumenta, “ANALISIS ESTIMASI PROYEK PERANGKAT LUNAK Bambang,” J. Tek. Inform., pp. 1–8, 2022.

[2] M. L. Haryanti, “Kajian Literatur: Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberhasilan Manajemen Proyek Agile pada Bidang IT,” Nuansa Inform., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2024, doi: 10.25134/ilkom.v18i1.76.

[3] G. Karner, “Resource estimation for objectory projects,” Object. Syst. SF AB, pp. 1–9, 1993, [Online]. Available: http://si.lopesgazzani.com.br/docentes/marcio/gcm/p_Karner_ResourceEstimationForObjectoryProjects.pdf

[4] T. A. Pratama and M. S. Hasibuan, “Penggunaan Use Case dan Use Case Point dalam Pengembangan Sistem E-commerce UKM,” J. Infortech, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 190–195, 2024, doi: 10.31294/infortech.v5i2.20839.

[5] Y. Mahmood, N. Kama, and A. Azmi, “A systematic review of studies on use case points and expert-based estimation of software development effort,” J. Softw. Evol. Process, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1–20, 2020, doi: 10.1002/smr.2245.

[6] S. Nurul Qudsiah and H. Yuliansyah, “Pengembangan aplikasi estimasi waktu dan biaya dengan metode use case point yang diintegrasikan pada scrum project management,” J. Sarajan Tek. Inform., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI

[7] M. C. Saputra et al., “Perbandingan Antara Metode Advance Use Case Point Dan Revised Use Case Point Untuk Evaluasi Biaya Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Reservasi Ruangan,” Jurnan Tek. Inform. Dan Sist. Inform., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 69–76, 2020, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.201961329.

[8] P. Jayadi, A. C. Aria Bima, Y. P. Yudha, and Kelik Sussolaikah, “End User Development pada Use Case Point untuk peningkatan Estimasi Perangkat Lunak,” Tematik, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 74–82, 2023, doi: 10.38204/tematik.v10i1.1289.

[9] L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy Sets,” Inf. Control, vol. 8, pp. 338–353, 1965.

[10] E. H. Mamdani and S. Assilian, “An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller,” Int. J. Man. Mach. Stud., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 1975, doi: 10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2.

[11] A. B. Nassif, L. F. Capretz, and D. Ho, “Estimating software effort based on use case point model using Sugeno Fuzzy Inference System,” Proc. - Int. Conf. Tools with Artif. Intell. ICTAI, pp. 393–398, 2011, doi: 10.1109/ICTAI.2011.64.

[12] R. Khalida, T. M. Kusuma, and K. F. Ramdhania, “Fuzzy Use Case Points as a Basis for Effort Estimation,” PIKSEL Penelit. Ilmu Komput. Sist. Embed. Log., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 181–196, 2023, doi: 10.33558/piksel.v11i1.6941.

[13] M. Azzeh, A. Bou Nassif, and I. B. Attili, “Predicting software effort from use case points: A systematic review,” Sci. Comput. Program., vol. 204, p. 102596, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scico.2020.102596.

[14] A. S. Karim, A. Firdha, and A. S. Al-Rafi, “Implementasi Aplikasi Absensi Karyawan Berbasis Mobile Pada IIB Darmajaya 1,2,*3,” vol. 19, no. x, pp. 567–577, 2025.

[15] A. Srivastava, S. K. Singh, and S. Q. Abbas, Performance measure of the proposed cost estimation model: Advance use case point method, vol. 742. Springer Singapore, 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0589-4_21.

[16] M. Hariyanto et al., “Estimasi Proyek Pengembangan Perangkat Lunak Dengan Fuzzy Use Case Points,” J. Softw. Eng., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–63, 2015.

[17] B. Boehm, C. Abts, and S. Chulani, “Software development cost estimation approaches — A survey,” Ann. Softw. Eng., vol. 10, pp. 177–205, 2000, doi: doi.org/10.1023/A:1018991717352.

[18] M. Jørgensen, “Experience With the Accuracy of Software Maintenance Task Effort Prediction Models,” IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 674–681, 1995, doi: 10.1109/32.403791.

[19] Ardiansyah, M. I. Zulfa, A. Tarmuji, and F. H. Jabbar, “Optimization of use case point through the use of metaheuristic algorithm in estimating software effort,” Int. J. Adv. Intell. Informatics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 109–130, 2024, doi: 10.26555/ijain.v10i1.1298.

[20] S. . Conte, H. . Dunsmore, and V. . Shen, Software engineering metrics and models. Menlo Park, CA. : Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co., 1986. doi: x.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Publikasi artikel ZONAsi: Jurnal Sistem Informasi Periode Mei 2026

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 ZONAsi: Jurnal Sistem Informasi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

CC BY-SA 4.0


Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  3. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

[1]
“KOMPARASI FUZZY USE CASE POINT DAN ADVANCE USE CASE POINT UNTUK ESTIMASI PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT LUNAK”, zn, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 480–491, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.31849/axe41k76.