The Topical Theme Depicted in the Talks of Education in Indonesian’s TEDx
a Systemic Functional Linguistics Approach
Abstract
The education-related TEDx presentations delivered by Indonesian speakers are a distinct linguistic phenomenon. It is a language in use where the message is communicated entirely through spoken speech as opposed to speaking itself. In light of systemic functional linguistics (SFL), this study examines the management of topical theme in relation to the message organisation of TE in TEDx. The aim of this study was to pinpoint and define the message's current theme in the TEDx format. Using the documentation method, the information was gleaned from an official TEDx broadcaster online. Two methods of analysis have been used: detailed text fragmentation and transcription. Following the analysis, the findings were presented and their theoretical SFL-based interpretation was given. This study shows that the phrasal and clausal forms of language, which are the constructional units of language, have taken on the topical theme in TE of TEDx. Phrasal constructs can be categorised into four different categories: noun phrase (NP), verb phrase (VP), adjective phrase (AP), and prepositional phrase (PP). The topical theme has also been functionalized as a component of other themes and the chain for coherence. This study recommended more examination of the organisation of the other component of the message. To ensure that the entire description of the thematic structure of TE in TEDx is respected, the combinatory analysis of theme and rheme will be essential.
Downloads
References
Banker, C., & Gournelos, T. 2013. TED Talks and the Need for a Changing Education System. Florida Communication Journal, 41(2).
Bartlett, T., & O’Grady, G. (2017a). The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, 1–682. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315413891
Bartlett, T., & O’Grady, G. (2017b). The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, 1–682. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315413891
Bloor, T., Bloor, M., Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2004). The Functional Analysis of English. The Functional Analysis of English. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774854
Calhoun, S. (2010). The centrality of metrical structure in signaling information structure:A probabilistic perspective. Language, 86(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1353/LAN.0.0197
Compagnone, A. 2015. The reconceptualization of academic discourse as a professional practice in the digital age: A critical genre analysis of TED Talks. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business, (54), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.7146/HJLCB.V27I54.22947
Crible, L., Abuczki, Á., Burkšaitienė, N., Furkó, P., Nedoluzhko, A., Rackevičienė, S., ... & Zikánová, Š. 2019. Functions and translations of discourse markers in TED Talks: A parallel corpus study of underspecification in five languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.012
Danilina, S., & Shabunina, V. 2018. Ted talk in the ESP classroom of philosophy students. Advanced Education, Issue 9, 47-5. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.128924
Danis, N. (2022). A corpus analysis of disciplinary identity in evaluative journal articles: A Systemic Functional Linguistics approach. English for Specific Purposes, 68, 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESP.2022.07.003
Doḿinguez, M., Farŕus, M., & Wanner, L. (2017). A Thematicity-based prosody enrichment tool for CTS. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH, 2017-August, 3421–3422. https://doi.org/10.21437/INTERSPEECH.2017-2023
Domínguez, M., Farrús, M., & Wanner, L. (2022). The Information Structure-prosody interface in text-to-speech technologies. An empirical perspective. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 18(2), 419–445. https://doi.org/10.1515/CLLT-2020-0008
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2013). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar: Fourth edition. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar: Fourth Edition, 1–789. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269
Halliday, M. A. K., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771
Herriman, J. (2011). Themes and theme progression in Swedish advanced learners’ writing in English. NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.35360/NJES.240
Humeniuk, I., Kuntso, O., Popel, N., & Voloshchuk, Y. 2021. Mastering listening comprehension at ESP classes using TED TALKS. Advanced Education, 27-34. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.226733
Jerome, C., & Ting, S. H. (2022). What’s in a message: A systemic functional analysis of cancer prevention messages. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), 32(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/IJAL.12380
Kirkpatrick, A. (2017). How important is argument? Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 81–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSLW.2017.05.006
Krifka, M. (2008). Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3–4), 243–276. https://doi.org/10.1556/ALING.55.2008.3-4.2
Krifka, M., & Musan, R. (2012). The expression of information structure. The Expression of Information Structure, 1–476. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261608/HTML
López-Carril, S., Añó, V., & González-Serrano, M. H. 2020. Introducing TED talks as a pedagogical resource in sport management education through YouTube and LinkedIn. Sustainability, 12(23), 10161. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310161
Loya, M. A., & Klemm, T. 2016. Teaching note—Using TED Talks in the social work classroom: Encouraging student engagement and discourse. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(4), 518-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1198291
MacKrill, K., Silvester, C., Pennebaker, J. W., & Petrie, K. J. 2021. What makes an idea worth spreading? Language markers of popularity in TED talks by academics and other speakers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(8), 1028-1038.
Mamalipurath, J. M. 2021. Postsecular rhetoric of the Pope: a discourse analysis of Pope Francis’ TED Talks. Church, Communication and Culture, 6(2), 250-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2021.1964373
Mamalipurath, J. M. 2022. When Islam goes to TED Talk: discourse features of a postsecular storytelling on Islam in new media. Contemporary Islam, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-022-00496-4
Mattiello, E. 2017. The popularisation of science via TED talks. International Journal of Language Studies, 11.
Mikhailovna, B. E. 2017. Some advantages of using TED talks as authentic study material. Коммуникативные исследования, (3 (13)), 127-133. https://doi.org/10.25513/2413-6182.2017.3.127-133
Pavavijarn, S. (2022). Influences of Thematic Progression on Quality of EFL Argumentative Writing. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 282–319.
Pin, W. A. N. G. 2018. Resuscitation, Redemption and Empathy: A Positive Discourse Analysis toward Language Violence. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 18(04), 49. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2018.04.004
Raffo, D. M. 2016. TED talks and leadership education: Ideas worth sharing. Journal of Leadership Education, 15(3), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.12806/V15/I3/A3
Rubenstein, L.D. 2012. Using TED talks to inspire thoughtful practice. The teacher educator, 47(4), 261-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2012.713303
Schiffer, S. (2005). The Things We Mean. The Things We Mean, 1–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199257760.001.0001
Shuqi, C. 2022. The Pragmatic Function of the Discourse Maker “Well” in TED Talks from the Perspective of Relevance Theory. Journal of Critical Studies in Language and Literature, 3(4), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.46809/jcsll.v3i4.156
Siahaan, H. V. F., Setia, E., Saragih, A., & Hanafiah, R. (2022). Thematic Development Analysis on Sunday Sermon Texts in Batak Christian Protestant Church. World Journal of English Language, 12(6), 220. https://doi.org/10.5430/WJEL.V12N6P220
Sidelnik, E. A., Lutsenko, N. S., & Germanovich, T. V. 2022. TED Talks as a Means of Developing Public Speaking Skills at English Classes in Technical Universities.(Pragmalinguistic Aspect). In Proceedings of the Conference “Integrating Engineering Education and Humanities for Global Intercultural Perspectives” (pp. 84-90). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11435-9_9
Steedman, M. (2000). Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(4), 649–689. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554505
Taibi, D., Chawla, S., Dietze, S., Marenzi, I., & Fetahu, B. 2015. Exploring TED talks as linked data for education. British journal of educational technology, 46(5), 1092-1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12283
Thomasson, A. L. (2022). How should we think about linguistic function? Inquiry (United Kingdom). https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2074886
Valeiras-Jurado, J., & Bernad-Mechó, E. 2022. Modal density and coherence in science dissemination: Orchestrating multimodal ensembles in online TED talks and youtube science videos. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 58, 101118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101118
Wei, J. (2015). Theme and thematic progression in Chinese college students’ English essays. Theme and Thematic Progression in Chinese College Students’ English Essays, 1–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0254-0
Copyright (c) 2023 Danang Satria Nugraha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. License
Use of articles will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA)
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Halaman Olahraga Nusantara permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
3. The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
4. The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
