BELE KAMPUNG SEKODI: INTERAKSIONISME SIMBOLIK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31849/jib.v21i1.22691Keywords:
Tradisi menjaga kampung, Bele Kampung, Interaksionisme Simbolik, Makna dan Simbol, BengkalisAbstract
The environment is one of the most important aspects of a community. So is the Sekodi community with the Bele Kampung tradition. This research is intended to obtain an overview of (a) To find out the process of implementing the Bele Kampung tradition in the Tanjung Community of Sekodi Village. (b) To find out the meaning of the Bele Kampung tradition in the people of Tanjung , Sekodi Village. This research uses a descriptive method with a qualitative research type used to reveal and describe how the Bele Kampung tradition occurs in maintaining the village in Sekodi village, Bengkalis Regency. Data were obtained from informants/speakers through interviews, recording and observation. The data obtained was then analyzed. Based on the research results. The symbols in the Bele Kampung tradition contain complex and deep meanings. The Bele Kampung tradition is carried out at the house of the implementing shaman once a year after a deliberative decision. It is done for three consecutive days. On the first day, they send a pebuang tool to the Tanjung and recite a congratulatory prayer there, then return home with water for bathing on the third day. On the second day, there is swinging, and the community is given words of advice and patted with fresh flour before swinging. After swinging and patting fresh flour, they then send pebuang tools to Tumu, Nipah, and Baran, and throw away the ancak used for bathing. On the third day, residents of Tanjung from three sacred places: Tanjung, Nipah, and Tumu. This tradition is very useful in maintaining the cleanliness and preservation of the village traditionally and the clean culture continues to be well maintained
References
Aksan, N., Kısac, B., Aydın, M., & Demirbuken, S. (2009). Symbolic interaction theory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 902-904.
Archibald, W. P. (1972). Symbolic Interaction Theory. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 1, 3.
Benzies, K. M., & Allen, M. (2001). Symbolic interactionism as a theoretical perspective for multiple method research. Journal of advanced nursing, 33(4), 541-547.
Blumer, H. (1979). Symbolic interactionism. Interdisciplinary approaches to human communication, 135-155.
Blumer, H. (2013). Society as symbolic interaction. In Human behavior and social processes (pp. 179-192). Routledge.
Carter, M. J., & Fuller, C. (2015). Symbolic interactionism. Sociopedia. isa, 1(1), 1-17.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research design: pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed.
Denzin, N. K. (2004). Symbolic interactionism. A companion to qualitative research, 81-87.
Efendi, E., Fadila, F., Tariq, K., Pratama, T., & Azmi, W. (2024). Interaksionisme Simbolik dan Prakmatis. Da'watuna: Journal of Communication and Islamic Broadcasting, 4(3), 1088-1095.
Glaser, B. G. (2005). The impact of symbolic interaction on grounded theory. The grounded theory review, 4(2), 1-22.
Gusfield, J. R. (2003). A journey with symbolic interaction. Symbolic interaction, 26(1), 119-139.
Husin, S. S., Ab Rahman, A. A., & Mukhtar, D. (2021). The Symbolic Interaction Theory: A Systematic Literature Review of Current Research. International Journal of Modern Trends in Social Sciences.
Mustari, O., Ratnasari, D., Apriadi, R., & Niko, N. (2023). Tradisi Bele Kampong Pada Masyarakat Desa Mentudu, Kepulauan Lingga. Jurnal Empirika, 8(2), 74-83.
Ningsih, J., Isjoni, I., & Kamaruddin, K. (2016). Tradisi" Bele Kampong" Masyarakat Kelurahan Gading Sari Kecamatan Kundur Kabupaten Karimun Riau University].
Nugroho, A. C. (2021). Teori utama sosiologi komunikasi (fungsionalisme struktural, teori konflik, interaksi simbolik). Majalah Semi Ilmiah Populer Komunikasi Massa, 2(2), 185-194.
Nurfadilah, S., & Roziah, R. (2024). Eksplorasi Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan dan Spiritual dalam Doa Bele Kampung: Studi pada Tradisi Masyarakat Melayu Desa Igal, Kecamatan Mandah, Indragiri Hilir. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(2), 2637-2646.
Rosaliza, M. (2015). Wawancara, Sebuah interaksi komunikasi dalam penelitian kualitatif. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 11(2), 71-79.
Rosaliza, M. (2017). Komunitas Suku Asli (Studi Kapital Sosiologi Masyarakat Suku Akit Pesisir di Desa Berancah Kecamatan Bantan Kabupaten Bengkalis). Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 14(1), 39-54.
Rosaliza, M. (2018). Local Knowledge Suku Akit Bengkalis. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 14(2), 104-112.
Sayuti, M., & Setiabudi, A. (2024). Tradisi Bele Kampung Masyarakat Desa Igal Kecamatan Mandah Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir Riau (Kajian Normatif dan Historis). Jurnal Pelita Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(1), 31-39.
Siregar, N. S. S. (2012). Kajian tentang interaksionisme simbolik. Perspektif, 1(2), 100-110.
Stryker, S. (2000). Symbolic interaction theory.
Stryker, S., & Vryan, K. D. (2003). The symbolic interactionist frame. Handbook of social psychology, 3-28.
Sugiarto, W., Prayugo, P., & Ervina, E. (2020). Tradisi Bele Kampung Studi Kasus Pambang Pesisir. Jurnal Edukasi: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 6(1), 1-28.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
