DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING THE BEST ORGANIZATIONAL ADMINISTRATORS USING A COMBINATION OF AHP-WP METHODS

Authors

  • Nesvia Nissa Artanti Universitan Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur
  • Abdul Rezha Efrat Najaf Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur
  • Tri Luhur Indayanti Sugata Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31849/fr63r297

Keywords:

Decision Support System, Analytical Hierarchy Process, Weighted Product, Best Administrator, Organizational

Abstract

The activity point calculation for determining the best committee member at UKKI of UPN “Veteran” Jatim had previously been carried out using spreadsheets. However, the criteria used were considered insufficient to represent important assessment aspects, while spreadsheet usage caused time-consuming data processing, potential human errors, and less optimal accuracy. To overcome these issues, a DSS was designed by implementing the AHP method to calculate criterion weights based on pairwise comparisons and consistency evaluation. The resulting weights were subsequently processed using the WP method to produce a more objective ranking outcome. The system was designed to improve accuracy and objectivity in selecting the best committee member. The assessment was based on five criteria: attendance in work programs (46.84%), activeness (26.81%), responsibility (14.36%), attitude (7.59%), and achievement (4.41%). Based on the calculation results, the committee member who obtained the highest score of 0.0241 was determined as the “best organizational administrator”.

References

[1] Guslendra, M. Afdhal, and E. Saputra, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Karyawan Terbaik Berbasis Web Menggunakan Metode VIKOR,” JEKIN: Jurnal Teknik Informatika, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 473–488, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.58794/jekin.v5i1.1350.

[2] R. Fauzan, Y. Indrasary, and N. Muthia, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa Bidik Misi di POLIBAN Dengan Metode SAW Berbasis Web,” JOIN: Jurnal Online Informatika, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 79–83, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.15575/join.v2i2.101.

[3] A. Gunawan, Munir, Y. Wibisono, and C. Furqon, Sistem Informasi Manajemen Terkini: Meningkatkan Efisiensi dengan Kecerdasan Buatan, 1st ed. Malang: PT. Literasi Nusantara Abadi Grup, 2023. [Online]. Available: www.penerbitlitnus.co.id

[4] F. Romadhoni, A. P. Sari, and F. A. Akbar, “Analytical Hierarchy Process dan Weighted Product Dalam Pemilihan Tempat Wisata Di Jombang Berbasis Web,” JATI: Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 4356–4363, 2024.

[5] R. Felinto de Farias Aires, Ferreira. Luciano, A. Galdino de Araujo, and D. Borenstein, “Student Selection in a Brazilian University: Using a Multi-Criteria Method,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 528–540, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1057/s41274-017-0242-3.

[6] M. F. Azis, F. P. Latuan, V. S. Penlaana, and Y. R. Kaesmetan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Website Terbaik Mahasiswa Stikom Uyelindo Kupang Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS,” JoTI: Journal of Technology and Informatics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 93–100, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.37802/joti.v5i2.565.

[7] S. K. Anwar, A. Priyanto, and C. Ramdani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Objek Wisata Menggunakan Metode AHP,” J-SAKTI: Jurnal Sains Komputer & Informatika, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 270–279, Mar. 2021.

[8] L. Septiani and U. Apsiswanto, “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Dalam Menentukan Santri Terbaik,” ZONAsi: Jurnal Sistem Informasi, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2025, doi: 10.31849/zn.v7i1.24210.

[9] A. I. Lubis, U. Erdiansyah, and F. Setiawan, “Kombinasi Metode AHP dan Weighted Product Dalam Penentuan Evaluasi Kinerja Asisten Pengajar,” Digital Transformation Technology (Digitech), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 38–44, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.47709/briliance.v1i2.

[10] A. Wantoro, A. C. Lutfy, Permata, A. T. Priandika, and V. Aryani, “Kombinasi Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dengan Metode Weighted Product (WP) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Rumah Ideal,” JPTI: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi Indonesia, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 409–418, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.52436/1.jpti.485.

[11] Goepel. Klaus D, “Implementation of an Online Software Tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP-OS),” International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, vol. 10, no. 3, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.13033/ijahp.v10i3.590.

[12] S. Kamila, R. Hadiwiyanti, and D. S. Y. Kartika, “Implementasi Metode AHP-SAW Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Perwakilan Olimpiade Akademik,” JATI: Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 7322–7329, Aug. 2024.

[13] V. P. Sabandar and R. Ahmad, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Produk Terbaik Menggunakan Weighted Product Method,” JICS: Jurnal Ilmiah Computer Science, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 58–68, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.58602/jics.v1i2.7.

[14] A. Sinaga and D. Maulana, “Implementation of Weighted Product Method for Evaluating Performance of Technicians,” International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 30–42, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.5815/ijmecs.2022.04.03.

[15] I. Taufikurrahman and Gunawansyah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Ketua Operasional DKM Ulil Albab Universitas Sangga Buana Dengan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Weighted Product (WP),” Jurnal Infotronik, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 70–81, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.32897/infotronik.2022.7.2.1707.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-17

How to Cite

[1]
“DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING THE BEST ORGANIZATIONAL ADMINISTRATORS USING A COMBINATION OF AHP-WP METHODS”, zn, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 927–937, Sep. 2026, doi: 10.31849/fr63r297.