Politeness Strategies in EFL Classroom Context: Avoiding Future Conflict and Maintain the Harmony of Diversity

  • Elita Sembiring Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Medan. Indonesia
  • Srisofian Sianturi Universitas HKBP Nomensen, Medan. Indonesia
Keywords: Politeness, Politeness Strategies, Communication, Cross Cultural Understanding Class

Abstract

The research aims to investigate the politeness in language and action by students of Letters Faculty at Methodist University. Seeing the students from different etnic, religion, and culture, should be understanding and well manage to avoid future conflict and maintain the harmony of diversity among them. The research was done in the fifth-semester Cross Cultural Understanding class of Letters Faculty, The Methodist University of Indonesia. The researchers used a qualitative approach by observing the activities of students and recording their utterances during responding to the point of view. The result shows that the students applied the four types of politeness strategies in responding to context of avoiding conflict and maintain the harmony. The types are bald on record strategy, positive strategy, negative strategy and off record strategy. From the four types of politeness strategies, bald on record strategy is dominantly used by students. It is due to the students have a similar position, and it seems that no distance between them. All the communications are between students to students. For a reason, saying something directly and to the point are frequently used. Being polite should be in words and actions. From the research, students are polite in words but not in action.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adel, S. M. R., Davoudi, M., & Ramezanzadeh, A. (2016). A qualitative study of politeness strategies used by Iranian EFL learners in a class blog. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 47-62.

Bayraktaroglu, A and Sifianou, M. (2001), Linguistic Politeness: the case of Greek and Turkish, USA: John Benjamins B.V

Brown, P & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Consolo, D.A. 2006. Classroom oral Interaction in Foreign Language Lessons and Implication for Teacher development. Linguagem & Ensino, 9 (2), 33-55

Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence (Vol. 28). Cambridge University Press.

Eelen, G. (2014). A Critique of Politeness Theory: Volume 1. Routledge.

Fukushima, S., & Haugh, M. (2014). The role of emic understandings in theorizing im/politeness: The metapragmatics of attentiveness, empathy and anticipatory inference in Japanese and Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 74, 165-179.

Garfinkel, H. (1964). Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities. Social problems, 11(3), 225-250.

Ginting, S. A. (2007). Kesantunan Dalam Upacara Perkawinan “Angantin Manuk”. Jurnal Linguistik Terapan Pascasarjana UNIMED, 4(2), 21-28.

Haugh, M. (2013). Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 52-72.

He, Y. (2012). Different generations, different face? A discursive approach to naturally occurring compliment responses in Chinese. Journal of Politeness Research: Language Behaviour Culture, 8(1), 29-51

Held, G. (1999). Submission strategies as an expression of the ideology of politeness: Reflections on the verbalisation of social power relations. Pragmatics, 9(1), 21-36.

Izadi, A., & Zilaie, F. (2012). Politeness strategies in email exchanges in Persian. Journal of Comparative Literature and Culture, 2(1), 86-90.

Kadar, Daniel Z., and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139382717

Mazari, A., & Derraz, N. (2015). Language and culture. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2(2), 350-359.

Meyerhoff, M. 2011. Introducing sociolinguistics (2nd Ed.). New York:

Mills, Sara, and Daniel Z. Kadar. 2001. “Politeness and Culture”. In Politeness in East Asia, ed. By Daniel Z. Kadar and Sara Mills, 21-44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Doi:10.1017/CBO9780511977886.004

Sembiring, E. (2012). Politeness Strategies Used in Karoness Wedding Ceremony “Cabur Bulung”. Jurnal Linguistik Terapan Pascasarjana UNIMED, 7(1), 25-30.

Senowarsito, S. (2013). Politeness strategies in teacher-student interaction in an EFL classroom context. TEFLIN Journal, 24(1), 82-96.

Sharifian, Farzad. 2011. ”Cultural Conceptualisation and Language: Theoritical Frameworkand Application. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Johnbenjamins. Doi:10.1075/clscc.1

Sharifian, Farzad. 2015. ”Cultural Linguistics.” In the Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture, ed. By Farzad Sharifian, 473-492. London and New York: Routledge

Sianturi, S. (2012). Politeness Strategies Used by Batak Toba Teenagers (Doctoral dissertation, UNIMED).

Spencer-Qatey, Helen. 2008. Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures (2nd.ed). London: Continuum.

Sibarani, R. 2004. Kesantunan bahasa. Antropolinguistik. Medan. Penerbit Poda

Watts, R. J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Published
2019-11-30
How to Cite
Sembiring, E., & Sianturi , S. (2019). Politeness Strategies in EFL Classroom Context: Avoiding Future Conflict and Maintain the Harmony of Diversity. Utamax : Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education, 1(3), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v1i3.6257
Abstract viewed = 572 times
PDF downloaded = 423 times