Peer Review Process
Jurnal Agribisnis (AGR) applies a peer-review process policy:
- Author Submits the Manuscript
- Editor Evaluation
- Double-Blind Review
- Editor Decision
- Confirmation to the Author
Every manuscript that goes to the editorial staff will be selected through Initial Review processes by Editorial Board. The manuscripts will be evaluated whether they are following the focus and scope of AGR. The Manuscripts that are not in accordance will be rejected, but the authors may be requested to revise if an adjustment is a possibility. The manuscripts under the focus and scope of Jurnal Agribisnis will be checked to identify any evidence of plagiarism before being reviewed by qualified reviewers. All manuscripts submitted will be reviewed by the Double-Blind Review system, in which reviewers do not know who the author(s) is, and the author(s) does not know who the reviewers are. At least 2 reviewers will review one manuscript. The reviewers' comments are sent anonymously to the authors to take the necessary actions and responses. Revised manuscript decisions will be evaluated by the appropriate editor, based on reviewers' recommendations, namely: (a) rejected, (b) requires major revisions, (c) requires minor revisions, or (d) accepted. The Editor has the right to decide which manuscripts submitted to AGR Journal should be published.