IMPLIKASI PERGANTIAN ANTAR WAKTU (PAW) ANGGOTA DPRD RIAU TERHADAP ADMINSITRASI PARLEMEN

  • hernimawati hernimawati universitas lancang kuning
Keywords: Candidate, DPRD, PAW, Political.

Abstract

This study examines the dynamics and process of PAW process of six members of DPRD Riau period 2014-2019 after deciding to become candidate for regional head. The problems that occurred PAW six Riau DPRD members after the enactment of candidates for regional head in the 2015 election did not run in accordance with established procedures. The research used the concept of Alert Time Substitution and Political Representation Theory with qualitative explorative method. The existing information system within the DPRD still does not reflect the regularity of factors that are shaped by the internal political background of political parties. a very long hiatus meeting in Riau's political representation included some neglected agenda and duties of legislation. In addition, the Ministry of Home Affairs decree was abolished in the determination of PAW Riau DPRD members 2014-2019 and became administrative judges that led to the vacancy of parliamentary seats

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]. Budiarjo, Miriam. 2008. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
[2]. Creswell, John. W. Research Design, Qualitative and Quantitative Aproaches, Jakarta : KIK Press.
[3]. Faisal, Sanafiah. 1990. Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar-dasar dan Aplikasi, Malang: YA3 Malang.
[4]. Gaffar, Affan. 2000. Politik Indonesia: Transisi Menuju Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
[5]. J. Moleong, Lexi. 2005. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
[6]. Marbun, BN. 2005. Kamus Politik. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan
[7]. Nimmo, Dan. 2004. Komunikasi Politik. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
\
[8]. Pamungkas, Sigit. 2012. Partai Politik: Teori dan Praktik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Institute for democracy and welfarism
[9]. Purwanto, Edi, Demokratisasi, Sistem Politik dan Pemerintahan, Averroes Press, Malang, 2011.
[10]. Syaukani, Afan Gafar, M. Ryaas Rasyid,.2002. Otonomi Daerah Dalam Negara Kesatuan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
[11]. Solihin, Dadang. Pengukuran Good Governance Index – Bahan Diskusi Evaluasi Kemampuan Penyelenggaraan Otonomi daerah (EKPOD) – Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Otonomi daerah, Depdagri.
[12]. K. Yin, Robert. 2003. Studi Kasus (Desain dan Metode), Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
[13]. Jimly Asshiddiqie, Desember 2006, “Partai Politik dan Pemilihan Umum Sebagai Instrument Demokrasi” Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 3 Nomor 4.
[14]. Sebastian Salang, Parlemen: Antara Kepentingan Politik VS Aspirasi Rakyat, Dalam Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 3 Nomor 4, Desember 2006.
[15]. Yandra, A. (2017). Fisibilitas Pilkada Serentak Tahap II Kota Pekanbaru Pasca Permendagri No 18 Tahun 2015. Jurnal Niara, 9(2), 62-74.
[16]. Undang-undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2009
[17]. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 16 tahun 2010
[18]. http://legislasi.blogspot.com/2008/12/konsep-legislasi.html
[19]. http://www.negarahukum.com/hukum/penggantian-antar-waktu-paw.html
Published
2017-01-04
How to Cite
hernimawati, hernimawati. (2017). IMPLIKASI PERGANTIAN ANTAR WAKTU (PAW) ANGGOTA DPRD RIAU TERHADAP ADMINSITRASI PARLEMEN. Jurnal Niara, 9(2), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.31849/nia.v9i2.2105
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 26 times
PDF downloaded = 28 times