Adaptive Governance and Agile Leadership in Street-Level Bureaucracy: Subsidy Implementation Effectiveness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31849/brxr5h80Keywords:
Subsidy Implementation, Street-Level Bureaucracy, Agile LeadershipAbstract
This study aims to examine the implementation of social subsidy policies in Sidoarjo Regency by analyzing the interaction between governance capacity, collaborative governance, and agility, with a particular focus on the role of street-level bureaucrats and agile leadership. The research employs a qualitative descriptive approach, conducted in Waru sub-district, covering Tambaksawah, Tambakrejo, and Tropodo villages. Informants include subsidy recipients, households entitled to but not receiving subsidies (12 respondents), local NGOs (3), street-level bureaucrats (6), and journalists (2). Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis, and triangulated for validity. Analysis follows the interactive qualitative model proposed by Creswell and Poth, including data organization, coding, thematic development, and interpretive analysis. Findings indicate that subsidy implementation faces challenges in accurate targeting, distribution quality of non-cash transfers, and adaptive utilization of cash subsidies by households. Street-level bureaucrats’ discretion and agile leadership emerge as critical factors bridging policy design and practical implementation, influencing public perception of government presence. The study contributes to the development of an adaptive governance model in public administration, highlighting the dual vulnerability of cash and non-cash subsidies and the necessity of contextualized, flexible, and responsive governance strategies.
References
1. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
2. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. (2021). Laporan hasil pemeriksaan atas program perlindungan sosial. Jakarta: BPK RI.
3. Bastagli, F., et al. (2018). Social protection and cash transfers: Evidence and implications. Journal of Social Policy.
4. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
5. Cunha, J., De Giorgi, G., & Jayachandran, S. (2019). Cash transfers and household behavior: Evidence from developing countries. Review of Economic Studies.
6. Gentilini, U. (2019). Social protection and delivery mechanisms: Lessons for cash versus in-kind transfers. World Bank Research Observer.
7. Handa, S., et al. (2018). Impact of cash transfers on household outcomes: Evidence from Latin America and Africa. World Development.
8. Hastuti, H., et al. (2020). The implementation of non-cash food assistance (BPNT) in Indonesia: Findings from the field. Jakarta: SMERU Research Institute.
9. Hidrobo, M., et al. (2018). In-kind versus cash transfers: Evidence from agricultural markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
10. Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2016). Achilles’ heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures. Regulation & Governance, 10(4), 301–313.
11. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2020). Kajian potensi fraud bantuan sosial. Jakarta: KPK.
12. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
13. Muralidharan, K., et al. (2019). Digital payments and social program efficiency. American Economic Review.
14. Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. (2022). Laporan tahunan pengawasan pelayanan publik. Jakarta: ORI.
15. Peters, B. G. (2010). The politics of bureaucracy (6th ed.). Routledge.
16. Setyari, N. P. W., & Purwanti, P. A. P. (2022). Direct cash transfer on children quality in women’s household in Indonesia. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 11(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjie.v11i1.22769
17. SMERU Research Institute. (2019). Social assistance targeting and implementation challenges in Indonesia. Jakarta: SMERU Research Institute.
18. World Bank. (2020). Indonesia social assistance reform program: Program appraisal document. Washington, DC: World Bank.
19. Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 165–171
