Implikasi Putusan Pidana Terhadap Status Pembuktian Akta Notaris
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31849/r7mfnt67Keywords:
implications of a criminal verdict, authentic deed, notarization, force of proof, forgery., implikasi putusan pidana, akta otentik, notaris, kekuatan pembuktian, pemalsuan.Abstract
An authentic deed made by a notary has perfect proof power because it is made by an authorized public official, including the power of proof outwardly, formally, and materially. In practice, notarial deeds are often the object of criminal cases, especially forgery of Deeds, causing problems regarding the implications of criminal decisions on the status of validity and strength of proof of the deed. This study analyzes the legal considerations of judges in decision number 73/PID/2023 / PT.BDG related to the crime of forgery of authentic deeds by notaries and its implications for the status of validity and strength of proof of Deeds. The method used is juridical normative with legislation and case approach, utilizing primary legal materials in the form of legislation and court decisions, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of books, journals, and relevant legal literature. The results showed that a criminal verdict against a notary does not automatically cause a deed to be null and void; the validity and strength of the evidence are still assessed based on civil law regarding the terms of validity of the deed and the principle of proof. However, if it is proven that there is a forgery that affects the truth of the deed, the deed may lose its authenticity and its strength of proof is degraded, potentially even declared to have no strength of proof, depending on the proof of the forgery.
References
Adjie, H. (2008). Sanksi perdata dan administratif terhadap notaris sebagai pejabat publik. Refika Aditama.
Adjie, H. (2011). Aspek pertanggungjawaban notaris dalam pembuatan akta. Mandar Maju.
Adjie, H. (2015). Kebatalan dan pembatalan akta notaris. Refika Aditama.
Afriana, A. (2020). Kedudukan dan tanggung jawab notaris sebagai pihak dalam penyelesaian sengketa perdata di Indonesia terkait akta yang dibuatnya. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 1(2).
Ali, Z. (2013). Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Amiruddin, & Asikin, Z. (2012). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Anshori, A. G. (2009). Lembaga kenotariatan Indonesia: Perspektif hukum dan etika. UII Press.
Budiono, H. (2013). Dasar teknik pembuatan akta notaris (Cet. 2). Citra Aditya Bakti.
Harris, F., & Helena, L. (2017). Notaris Indonesia. Lintas Cetak Djaja.
Kelsen, H. (2007). Pengantar teori hukum. Kompas.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Kencana.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Liberty.
Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.
Prodjodikoro, W. (2011). Asas-asas hukum pidana di Indonesia. Refika Aditama.
Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Bandung Nomor 73/PID/2023/PT.BDG.
Salim, H. S. (2016). Teknik pembuatan akta satu: Konsep teoretis, kewenangan notaris, bentuk dan minuta akta (Ed. 1, Cet. 2). Rajawali Pers.
Salim, H. S., & Nurbani, E. S. (2017). Penerapan teori hukum pada penelitian disertasi dan tesis (Buku kedua). Rajawali Pers.
Subekti. (2010). Hukum pembuktian. Pradnya Paramita.
Sunggono, B. (2007). Metode penelitian hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
