Asynchronous Learning Model (Its Implementation Via Google Classroom)

  • Oktari Sela Universitas Terbuka
  • Fadly Azhar Universitas Riau
  • Udi Samanhudi Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Keywords: Asynchronous Learning Model, Google Classroom


The paper aims to explore how the students’ perception on the implementation of the asynchronous learning model via google classroom and the process of its implementation by the teachers.  In this research, students’ perception on the implementation of the asynchronous learning model via google classroom is conceptualized by five categories: the development of students' self-control towards their learning or being independent, development of self-reflection on students' learning, convenience (no presence needed), fewer social obstacles (for introverted students), awareness in using technology and interactivity regardless of the time and place constraints. Meanwhile, the process of its implementation is set by three components, they are uploading the material, asking the students to learn the materials and doing a task, and giving feedback. 96 students from SMPN  1 Tembilahan participated in answering the questionnaire sheet and three teachers were responding to the interview. The results showed that students’ perception on the implementation of the asynchronous learning model via google classroom is good because most of them claimed that the implementation of Google Classroom by using an asynchronous model gives a positive impact on them, especially for being more independent, being aware of using technology, and being more responsible in doing tasks. Then for the process of its implementation, all three teachers followed the three components above and they improve it creatively


Download data is not yet available.


Alssager, Mansour & Nasir, Ibrahim. (2021). Evaluation of using Google Classroom as a Tool for Asynchronous E-learning at Sebha University. Sebha University Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences, Vol.20 (1).

Corfman, T., & Beck, D. (2019). Case Study of Creativity in Asynchronous Online Discussions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16 (1). 1–20.

Destianingsih, A., & Satria, A. (2020). Investigating Students’ Needs for Effective English Online Learning During Covid-19 for Polbeng Students. ELT-Lectura, 7(2), 147-153.

Johnson, K. (2019). A Phenomenological Study on Teachers’ Perceptions Regarding the Implementation of a Blended Learning Program [Doctoral dissertation]. Houston Baptist University. https://darius. 20.500.12262/217

Lin, H. S., Hong, Z. R., & Lawrenz, F. (2012). Promoting and scaffolding argumentation through reflective asynchronous discussions. Computers and Education, 59 (2). 378–384.

Mafa, K. R., & Govender, D. W. (2017). Perceptions of Students Towards the Use of Mobile Devices in Improving Academic Performance: A Case of a Senior Secondary School in a Developing Country. PONTE International Scientific Researchs Journal, 73 (4). 220–233. 4.19

Murphy, E., Rodríguez-Manzanares, M. A., & Barbour, M. (2011). Asynchronous and Synchronous Online Teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high school distance education teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42 (4). 583–591.

Parsad,B .& Lewis,L. (2008). Distance Education at Degree-Granting Post secondary Institutions: 2006–07 (NCES 2009–044). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from pubs2009/2009044.pdf

Pratiwi, J. A., Rosalina, N., Rodiah, N., & Ervina, W. (2021). The Performance of Synchronous and Asynchronous Method in Teaching and Learning English. ETDC Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 1 (1). 46–57.

Saliimah, F. R. (2021). The Influence Between Synchronous And Asynchronous Learning Model Toward Students’ English Achievement At Sman 1 Sambit. (Online Thesis). State Institute of Islamic Studies Ponorogo. Retrieved on January 22, 2022 at

Salehudin, Mohammad., Zulherman., Ardian Arifin., & Darmawan Napitupulu. (2021) Extending Indonesia Government Policy for E-Learning and Social Media Usage. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, Vol. 11, No. 2, (pp. 14-26). DOI: 10.14527/pegegog.2021.00

Siswati, Sri., Astiena, Adila Kasni & Savitri, Yolanda. (2020) Evaluation of Online-Based Student Learning: Models During New Normal Pandemic Covid-19 in Indonesia. Journal of Non Formal Education, Vol. 6 No. 2. DOI:

Supriyanto, A., Hartini, S., Irdasari, W. N., Miftahul, A., Oktapiana, S., & Mumpuni, S. D. (2020). Teacher professional quality: Counselling services with technology in Pandemic Covid-19. Counsellia: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 10 (2). 176–189.

Vidhiasi, D. M., Hakim, M. A., Humardhiana, A., Ikawati, L., & Aisyiyah, M. N. (2021). The Application of Asynchronous Learning for English Language Teaching in English and Non-English Study Program. Journal of English as A Foreign Language Teaching and Research (JEFLTR). 1, (2). 33–43..

Qiong, OU. (2017). A brief Introduction to Perception. Studies in Literature and Language, 15(4), 18-28. DOI:10.3968/10055

Yentri Anggeraini, Episiasi, & Bambang Sulistyo. (2022). Teaching Strategies in Online Reading Classroom: A Case Study. ELT-Lectura, 9(1), 107-116.

How to Cite
Oktari Sela, Fadly Azhar, & Udi Samanhudi. (2022). Asynchronous Learning Model (Its Implementation Via Google Classroom) . ELT-Lectura, 9(2), 227-242.
Abstract viewed = 262 times
PDF downloaded = 187 times