An English Reading Material Analysis Through Microlearning and Critical Thinking Skill Views

Keywords: Critical Thinking Skill, Microlearning, English Reading Material, Tenth Graders

Abstract

The other advantages of microlearning included improving critical thinking, reducing cognitive load, concentrating on learning, and closing the theory-practice gap. This study looks into Symphony 1, an English course book, to assess how much reading involves microlearning and critical thinking skills. The cognitive domain of Anderson and Krathwohl revised Bloom's Taxonomy, which has been modified with critical thinking skills, served as the instrument for this descriptive qualitative study. The Microlearning descriptor, which was used as the second instrument, was taken from several pertinent sources. The researcher then determined the frequency and percentage of the cognitive domain of the data under investigation. According to the research, Symphony 1 contains 42 data on microlearning and 44 data on critical thinking skills. In the meantime, the proportion of each technique varies for both features. It proved that the existing learning materials actually contain critical thinking skills and microlearning. However, each chapter of the book needs to balance and emphasize how much of each indicator is used. The study suggests that textbook authors stress microlearning ideas and critical thinking skills more so as a way to enhance students' reading experiences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aghajani, M., & Gholamrezapour, E. (2019). Critical thinking skills, critical reading and foreign language reading anxiety in Iran context. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12414a

Allela, M. (2021). Introduction to Microlearning. Coomonwealth of Learning.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning. Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. https://www.uky.edu/~rsand1/china2018/texts/Anderson-Krathwohl - A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing.pdf

Arifin, S. (2020). The Role of Critical Reading to Promote Students’ Critical Thinking and Reading Comprehension. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 53(3), 318. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v53i3.29210

Arnab, S., Walaszczyk, L., Lewis, M., Kernaghan-andrews, S., Masters, A., Calderwood, J., & Clarke, S. (2021). Designing Mini-Games as Micro-Learning Resources for Professional Development in Multi-Cultural Organisations. 19(2), 44–58.

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods (5th Editio). Allyn and Bacon.

Crescentini, A., & Mainardi, G. (2009). Qualitative Research Articles: Guidelines, Suggestions and Needs. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(5), 431–439.

Firmansyah, M. (2022). Communication Skills-Integrated and Microlearning-Based English Learning Materials of Writing for 7 th Graders of Mild Intellectually Disabled Students. Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Gagne, J. C. De, Woodward, A., Park, H. K., Sun, H., Yamane, S. S., Dougherty, D., & Siemens, G. (2019). review protocol. 1018–1025. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003884

Hug, T. (2009). Outline of a Microlearning Agenda. E-Learning Papers, September, 1–13.

Jaleniauskiene, E., & Juceviciene, P. (2015). Reconsidering University Educational Environment for the Learners of Generation Z. Social Sciences, 88(2), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ss.88.2.12737

Lee-Fiedler, J. D. (2021). NURSE EDUCATORS’ EXPERIENCES USING MICROLEARNING STRATEGIES: A BASIC QUALITATIVE STUDY. October.

Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (Global Edi). Pearson Education.

Nurtasha, P. (2022). COMMUNICATIVE LEARNING-INTEGRATED AND MICROLEARNING- BASED ENGLISH LEARNING MATERIALS OF READING FOR 7th GRADERS OF MILD INTELLECTUALLY DISABLED STUDENTS. Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Putri, R. N. (2022). COLLABORATIVE LEARNING-INTEGRATED AND MICROLEARNING- BASED ENGLISH LEARNING MATERIALS OF SPEAKING FOR 8th GRADERS OF MILD INTELLECTUALLY DISABLED STUDENTS. Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Sari, R. N., & Sakhiyya, Z. (2020). An analysis of the English course book viewed from higher-order thinking skills Article Info. JOurnal of English Language Teaching, 9(2), 203–212. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/elt

Seif, A. A. A.-Q. A. (2012). Evaluating the Higher Order Thinking Skills in Reading Exercises of English for Palestine Grade 8.

Sharil, M., Mahbob, N. N., & Baharudin, N. S. (2017). Overview of “Generation Z” Behavioural Characteristic and Its Effect Towards Hostel Facility. International Journal of Real Estate Studies, 11(2), 59–67.

Talenta, P. I., & Pavita, M. D. A. (2022). Business English Materials; What Should be Developed Related to the 21st Competencies. ELT- Lectura: Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching, 9(2), 209–216.

Torgerson, C., & Iannone, S. (2020). What Works in Talent Development: Designing Microlearning. P.A Hutchinson Company.

Vrieska, D., & Kasriyati, D. (2017). USING WINDOW NOTES STRATEGY TO IMPROVING STUDENTS’READING SKILL IN NARRATIVE TEXT AT EIGHT GRADE OF MTS TAUFIQ WALHIDAYAH PEKANBARU. ELT-Lectura, 4(2).

Widayani, G. (2022). COLLABORATIVE LEARNING-INTEGRATED AND MICROLEARNING-BASED ENGLISH LEARNING MATERIALS OF READING FOR THE EIGHTH GRADERS OF MILD INTELLECTUALLY DISABLED STUDENTS. Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Published
2023-02-20
How to Cite
Kusmana, D. A. K., Dewanti, R., & Sulistyaningrum, S. D. (2023). An English Reading Material Analysis Through Microlearning and Critical Thinking Skill Views. ELT-Lectura, 10(1), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.31849/elt-lectura.v10i1.12257
Abstract viewed = 340 times
PDF downloaded = 224 times