The Correlation between Motivational Regulation Strategies and Students’ Writing Ability

Authors

  • Anjani Vicka Prasasti Hasibuan State University of Surabaya
  • Ahmad Munir Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Widyastuti Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31849/elt-lectura.v11i2.20931

Keywords:

Argumentative writing, motivational regulation strategies, writing ability

Abstract

The present study looked for kind of motivational regulation strategies used by students with high and low writing ability and found relationship between students’ motivational regulation strategies and writing ability. The method in this study is quantitative with correlational study research design, the subject of the study is 31 English education students in one of state university who took argumentative writing classroom. The questionnaire from Wolters & Benzon (2013a) are used in this study as research instrument of motivational regulation strategies. The result showed different motivational regulation strategies used by students with high writing ability and low writing ability. Students with high writing ability tended to use regulation of value (M=4.04). Furthermore, there is no significant relationship between students’ motivational regulation strategies and their writing ability. Some findings are in line with the research conducted by Wolters & Benzon (2013a) about average of motivational regulation strategies used by students, however, further research in how far motivational regulation strategies affect to students’ writing ability can be conducted by other researchers.

Author Biographies

  • Ahmad Munir, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

    English Language Education 

  • Widyastuti, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

    English Language Education

References

Abd Alhameed Alodwan, T., & Saleh Khalaf Ibnian, S. (2014). The Effect of Using the Process Approach to Writing on Developing University Students’ Essay Writing Skills in EFL. 3(2).

Alshenqeeti, H. (2018). Motivation and Foreign Language Learning: Exploring the Rise of Motivation Strategies in the EFL Classroom. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(7), 1.

Episiasi, E., Syaputri, W., Suramto, S., & Kasriyati, D. (2022). Lexical and Grammatical Cohesion in the Undergraduate Studentsâ€TM Abstracts. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 5(2), 143–152.

Ibnian, S. S. K. (2011). Brainstorming and essay writing in EFL class. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(3), 263–272.

Kasriyati, D., Suharni, S., & Andriani, R. (2024). Implementation of Web-Based E-Learning for English Language Learning in Early Childhood. Journal of English Education, Literature and Linguistics, 7(1), 19–28.

Kryshko, O., Fleischer, J., Waldeyer, J., Wirth, J., & Leutner, D. (n.d.). Do motivational regulation strategies contribute to university students’ academic success? Learning and Individual Differences. 82.

Mason, L. H., Meadan, H., Hedin, L. R., & Cramer, A. M. (2012). Avoiding the struggle: Instruction that supports students’ motivation in reading and writing about content material. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 28(1), 70–96.

Mohammad, T., & Hazarika, Z. (2016). Difficulties of Learning EFL in KSA: Writing Skills in Context. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(3), 105.

Olinghouse, N. G., Zheng, J., & Morlock, L. (2012). State writing assessment: Inclusion of motivational factors in writing tasks. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 28(1), 97–119.

Park, S., & Yun, H. (n.d.). The Influence of Motivational Regulation Strategies on Online Students’ Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive Engagement. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(1), 43–56.

Rao, Z. (2007). Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills. ELT Journal, 61(2), 100–106.

Sánchez-Rosas, J., Aguirre, R. S., Bovina-Martijena, N., & Galarza, V. L. (n.d.). Motivational Regulation Strategies: A Questionnaire for its Measurement in Argentinian University Students. Revista Evaluar, 19(1).

Sekar Diasti, K., & Laos Mbato, C. (n.d.). Exploring Undergraduate Students’ Motivation-regulation Strategies in Thesis Writing. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 14(2).

Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Empowering learners in the second/foreign language classroom: Can self-regulated learning strategies-based writing instruction make a difference? Journal of Second Language Writing, 48.

Teng, L. S., Yuan, R. E., & Sun, P. P. (n.d.). A mixed-methods approach to investigating motivational regulation strategies and writing proficiency in English as a foreign language contexts. System, 88.

Troia, G. A., Harbaugh, A. G., Shankland, R. K., Wolbers, K. A., & Lawrence, A. M. (2013). Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performance: Effects of grade, sex, and ability. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 17–44.

Wijekumar, K., Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Lei, P. W., Barkel, A., Aitken, A., Ray, A., & Houston, J. (2019). The roles of writing knowledge, motivation, strategic behaviors, and skills in predicting elementary students’ persuasive writing from source material. Reading and Writing, 32(6), 1431–1457.

Wilby, J. (2022). Motivation, self-regulation, and writing achievement on a university foundation programme: A programme evaluation study. Language Teaching Research, 26(5), 1010–1033.

Wolters, C. A., & Benzon, M. B. (n.d.). Assessing and predicting college students use of strategies for the self-regulation of motivation. Journal of Experimental Education, 81(2), 199–221.

Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-Regulated Learning and College Students’ Regulation of Motivation. In Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2).

Yentri Anggeraini, Episiasi, S. P. N. (2024). The Relationship between Study Habits and Academic Achievement in English Education Study Program at Baturaja University. ELT-Lectura: Studies and Perspectives in English Language Teaching, 11(2), 102–109.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-26

How to Cite

The Correlation between Motivational Regulation Strategies and Students’ Writing Ability . (2024). ELT-Lectura, 11(2), 157-167. https://doi.org/10.31849/elt-lectura.v11i2.20931