Multilingual Realities in ESP Context: Learner Perspectives on Effective ESP Pedagogy in Diverse Classrooms

Authors

  • Jeihn Novita Chirstanty Budiman Politeknik Pelayaran Sulawesi Utara, Minahasa Selatan, Indonesia
  • Nindy Nource Ganap Politeknik Pelayaran Sulawesi Utara, Minahasa Selatan, Indonesia
  • Devilito Prasetyo Tatipang Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31849/w5cffj04

Keywords:

English for specific purposes (ESP), Multilingualism in education, Translanguaging pedagogy, Learner-centered instruction, Collaborative learning, Second language acquisition (SLA)

Abstract

In an era where global communication increasingly depends on multilingual competence, ESP classrooms are no longer linguistically uniform spaces but dynamic sites of negotiation between languages, identities, and professional demands. Yet, despite this reality, ESP pedagogy continues to be shaped largely by monolingual assumptions that overlook how learners actively navigate multiple linguistic resources in meaning-making. Existing studies have predominantly focused on needs analysis and material design, with limited attention to learners’ situated voices in multilingual vocational contexts. Moreover, prior research has rarely extended extensive listening theory beyond traditional reading while listening paradigms, leaving a critical gap in understanding how listening-oriented meaning construction operates in multilingual ESP environments. Addressing this gap, the study adopts a mixed-method case study design involving 45 cadets at Politeknik Pelayaran Sulawesi Utara from diverse linguistic backgrounds. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and open-ended responses, analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results show 70% of participants prefer bilingual instruction combining English and Indonesian, while 20% favor full English and 10% support inclusion of local languages. Regarding pedagogical preferences, Task-Based Learning (25%), Collaborative Learning (20%), and Role Play (18%) emerged as most effective approaches, whereas lecturing (5%) and grammar translation (10%) were less favored. Furthermore, 49% of students perceived the multilingual environment as supportive, 29% as neutral, and 22% as challenging. These findings position multilingualism as a pedagogical resource facilitated through translanguaging and interactive practices. The study contributes by advancing learner-centered ESP pedagogy and recontextualizing extensive listening within multilingual contexts, with implications for adaptive curriculum design, teacher development, and inclusive language policy in global education.

Author Biographies

  • Jeihn Novita Chirstanty Budiman, Politeknik Pelayaran Sulawesi Utara, Minahasa Selatan, Indonesia

    Jeihn Novita Christanty Budiman is a senior lecturer at Politeknik Pelayaran Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia, where she also serves as Vice Director II, playing a strategic role in strengthening institutional governance and advancing academic quality. Her expertise lies in Maritime English and pedagogical innovation tailored to the needs of maritime cadets. Her scholarly work focuses on enhancing language proficiency, communicative competence, and adaptive learning strategies within specialized maritime contexts. Through her active engagement in research and academic publication, she consistently contributes to the development of high-quality maritime education and the professional readiness of future seafarers in Indonesia.

  • Nindy Nource Ganap , Politeknik Pelayaran Sulawesi Utara, Minahasa Selatan, Indonesia

    Nindy Nource Ganap is an academic at Politeknik Pelayaran Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia, with a strong background in English education and language studies.  Her research interests include social criticism, cultural representation, and comparative literature, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach that integrates language, literature, and cultural discourse within both educational and research contexts.

  • Devilito Prasetyo Tatipang, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia

    Devilito Prasetyo Tatipang is a PhD candidate in English Education at Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia, with a strong academic trajectory in research, teaching, and scholarly publication within the field of English Language Teaching. His research interests encompass Translanguaging in ELT, plurilingual education, language pedagogy, and the integration of artificial intelligence in both language learning and literary studies. He is actively engaged as a reviewer and editor for several reputable journals, demonstrating his critical role in maintaining academic rigor and publication quality. His work reflects a sustained commitment to advancing innovative, technology-driven, and evidence-based pedagogical practices that contribute to the evolving landscape of ELT in both national and international contexts.

References

Translanguaging in the ESP context: Saudi students’ perceptions of bilingual practices. ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching, 11(1), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v11i1.60894

Berrabah, A., & Toubeida, M. (2024). Multilingual education in the Algerian university: Blurring borders and unveiling linguistic dimensions. Langues & Cultures, 5(2), 231–241. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/256859

Biglar-Beigi Ghajarieh, A., Amin Mozaheb, M., & Aghabozorgi, A. (2024). Exploring pedagogical translanguaging in bilingual and multilingual ESP versus EGP teachers’ and students’ discourses in Iran. Journal of Language Horizons, 8(4), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.22051/LGHOR.2024.44196.1820

Budianto, L., & Mason, A. (2021). Autonomous learning features: A case study in an Indonesian ESP classroom. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v7i1.1213

Carciu, O. M., & Mureșan, L. M. (2024). Designing multimodal learning for developing multilingual undergraduate students’ communication competences in English. In Designing learning with digital technologies (pp. 185–205). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003359272-14

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Guan, X. (2023). Translanguaging as a theoretical lens in language learning and its pedagogical functions in multilingual classrooms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Language Learning (pp. 245–254). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-97-8_31

Gvelesiani, I. (2023). Teaching ESP: New strategies and approaches. Journal of Research in Higher Education, 7(1), 25–39.

Irham. (2023). Important but not desired: Students’ perception towards English(es) in multilingual settings. Asian Englishes, 25(3), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2022.2042774

Jungco, S., Maligang, A., Malubay, L., & Esimos, M. (2022). Reticence to speak English: Lived experiences of teacher education students. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 10(1), 2124–2130. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v10i1.el06

Latysheva, S. (2018). Discourse-competence approach to design of ESP courses. SHS Web of Conferences, 50, Article 01095. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001095

Laziza Abrorovna, A. (2025). The goals and learning styles of law students in learning ESP (English for specific purposes). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 1(2), 230–233. https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/ijai/article/view/73543

Liando, N. V. F., Dallyono, R., Tatipang, D. P., & Lengkoan, F. (2023). Among English, Indonesian and local language: Translanguaging practices in an Indonesian EFL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i1.58270

Liando, N. V. F., Tatipang, D. P., & Lengkoan, F. (2022). A study of translanguaging practices in an EFL classroom in Indonesian context: A multilingual concept. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 5(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.33603/rill.v5i2.6986

Macaro, E., & Aizawa, I. (2024). English medium instruction, EAP/ESP: Exploring overlap and divergences in research aims. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 1352–1367. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12563

Mohammadi, S., & Zandi, H. (2025). “Space-regulation”: Exploring attitudes towards transitions across learning spaces in an ESP programme. Learning Environments Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-025-09532-5

Mythiri, B., Anjana Krishna, S., & Karthika, V. K. (2024). A study on Indian ESP teachers’ classroom practices in fostering social inclusivity. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(2), 554–568. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2022-0298

Neokleous, G., & Karpava, S. (2023). Comparing pre-service teacher attitudes toward the use of students’ home language(s) in linguistically diverse English as an additional language classrooms in Norway and Cyprus. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1254025. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1254025

Nur, H., R., & Awal Mar’an, D. (2024). Teachers’ teaching strategies in ESP: A descriptive study at Malahayati University. Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 4(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v4i001.357

Pakdaman, A., Alibakhshi, G., & Baradaran, A. (2022). The advantages of using negotiated syllabus in EFL classes: Exploring undergraduate students’ perceptions. Qualitative Research Journal, 22(4), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-01-2022-0010

Raza, K., & Chua, C. (2022). Neoliberal ideologies in teaching and assessing ESP legal English: A case study from the Middle East. In Transnational English language assessment practices in the age of metrics (pp. 189–203). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003252382-16

Raza, K., Reynolds, D., & Coombe, C. (2023). Multilingual TESOL in practice in higher education: Insights from EFL classrooms at a Gulf university. In Handbook of multilingual TESOL in practice (pp. 5–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9350-3_1

Roshid, M., & Kankaanranta, A. (2023). English communication skills in international business: Industry expectations versus university preparation. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 100–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231184814

Şanal, M. (2023). Raising multilingual learners’ awareness of social justice through translanguaging pedagogy. Focus on ELT Journal, 5(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14744/felt.2023.5.2.1

Shen, H., Li, G., Zhong, J., & Zhou, Y. (2025). LDP: Generalizing to multilingual visual information extraction by language decoupled pretraining. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 39(7), 6805–6813. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v39i7.32730

Sipahutar, R., & Chang, T. (2024). Harmonizing languages: The impact of multilingual classroom dynamics on teaching Indonesian in Taiwan. WORLDFLE, 1(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.33422/worldfle.v1i1.609

Suharti, D., Musthafa, B., & Yusuf, F. (2022). A needs analysis of technology-integrated basic English grammar course in the Indonesian context. International Journal of Education, 15(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v15i1.50391

Tsou, W., & Baker, W. (2021). English-medium instruction translanguaging practices in Asia. In English-medium instruction translanguaging practices in Asia (pp. 1–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3001-9

Wen, Z., Zhang, L., Kong, H., & Han, L. (2022). Translanguaging genre pedagogy: Implications for teaching business communication in the Greater Bay Area. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00161-6

Yousafzai, R., & Fareed, M. (2019). ESP teaching practices in management science at post-graduate level in Pakistan: Perceptions of ESP teachers and ESP learners. Journal of Management Sciences, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.1906101

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Multilingual Realities in ESP Context: Learner Perspectives on Effective ESP Pedagogy in Diverse Classrooms. (2026). Utamax : Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education, 8(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.31849/w5cffj04