Analysis of Sentence Types in Affecting College Students’ Writing Skill
Abstract
College students are required to complete an undergraduate thesis as part of their final project. However, when addressing the issues students face with their limited vocabulary, their choice of proper grammar, and their syntactical or word class problems, etc., researchers seldom carried out a focused exploration on dominant sentence types. This study aims to identify the most dominant sentence type used by the students in their writing, determine the forms of sentences used within the dominant sentence type, and analyse the factors influencing students' writing. This research used a quantitative descriptive method with an innovative methodological approach, namely a fishbone diagram to analyse the underlying factors. 105 background proposals from 7th semester students in the English Department at Tadulako University participated in this study. A simple random sampling technique was employed, and questionnaires and document analysis were used as instruments to gather data. The data analysis results show that: (1) simple sentences made up the majority of the dominant sentence types used in students’ backgrounds; (2) nominal sentences were the second most common form of dominant sentences used by the students; and (3) there are three factors that impact students' writing, particularly regarding sentence types: internal and external factors. The implication of this research is the development of writing skills where sentence types are an essential part of writing. The results can aid students in crafting clear and coherent sentences, specifically how to structure sentences effectively to convey their ideas logically, avoiding run-on sentences or fragments that can obscure meaning.
Downloads
References
Alexander, L. G. (1988). Longman English Grammar. Longman.
Alisha, F., Safitri, N., Santoso, I., & Siliwangi, I. (2019). Students’ Difficulties in Writing Efl. Professional Journal of English Education, 2(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v2i1.p20-25
Analisti, D., Language, E., & Indonesia, U. P. (2016). Evaluating the Quality of Sentence Structures, Citations and References in Journal Articles: A Case Study in the Faculty of Mathematics and Science and the Faculty of Engineering. Unpublished, 1–18.
Basri, H., Hastini, & Bochari, S. (2021). Understanding Syntax.pdf. Untad Press.
Beglar, D., & Nemoto, T. (2014). Developing Likert-scale Questionnaires. JALT2013 Conference Proceedings, 1–8.
Briones, S. K. F., Dagamac, R. J. R., David, J. D., & Landerio, C. A. B. (2022). Factors Affecting the Students ’ Scholastic Performance : A Survey Study. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology (IJERT), 2(1), 97–102. https://doi.org/: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijert.v2i2.41394
Dewi, E. P., & Haryudin, A. (2019). The uses of clause relations in the Guardian Article: Destroying the World’s Natural Heritage: ‘Komodo is Reaching a Tipping Point.’ Project, 2(6), 824–829. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v2i6.p824-829
Dharmawati, & Mulyadi. (2021). A Study on Relative Clause in English, Indonesian and Arabic Language : A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 4778, 109–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2338/ideas.v9i2.p358-365
Famularsih, S., & Helmy, M. I. (2020). A Comparative Study of Sentence Building in Writing Ability Among Students in Indonesia. Pedagogy : Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v8i2.2222
Fitria, T. N. (2021). Non-EFL Students ’ Ability in Writing Simple Sentences of Descriptive Paragraphs. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistics, 4(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.220918/jetal.v4i1.p1-9
Indriyani, R., & Said, M. (2022). Exploring Complex Sentences and Metaphors in Online News Articles about Covid-19 in Asia Times. INFERENCE: Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(2), 121–132.
Kartika, V. D. (2022). Nominal and Verbal Sentence of Simple Present Tense Errors in Students ’ Descriptive Writing Ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Https://Journal.Unismuh.Ac.Id/, 11, 165–175.
Katamba, F. (2005). An Introduction to Phonology (Third Edit). PEARSON Longman.
Keskin, S. (2019). Factors Affecting Students Preferences for Online and Blended Learning: Motivational Vs Cognitive. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 22(2), 15.
Leba, S. M. R., Uspayanti, R., Butarbutar, R., & Bawawa, M. (2021). Syntactical Analysis of Students ’ Writing Paper. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 603(Icss), 427–430.
Lisiswanti, R., Indah sari, M., & Swastyardi, D. (2022). Factors Affecting Low Academic Achievement of Undergraduate Medical Students: Student Experience. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education, 11(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.65566
Malaguial, P. M., Gacoscos, G., Martinez, E., Abusama, H., & Valdez, A. (2023). Senior High School Strands: Factors Affecting the Students’ Preference. ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 2(1), 57–66.
Maleke, M., & Phafoli, L. S. (2020). The Use of Nominal Subordinate Clause as a Syntactic Complexity Measure by Some National University of Lesotho Students. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT), 3(11), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt
Mayasari, D., & Ardhana, N. R. (2022). Syntax Structure in Manduros’ Utterance as Basic Writing Skill. ELite Journal : International Journal of Education, Language, and Literature, 2(2), 100–108. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/elite
Mcmurrey, D. (2019). Basic Patterns and Elements of the Sentence. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/opentc/32
Millaku, S., & Topanica, X. (2016). The Indirect Object ( IO ) – Albanian and English. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.162412
Mısır, H. (2017). The analysis of A1 lLevel Speaking Exam in Terms of Syntax-The Effect of General Competence on Syntax in A1 Level Speaking. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 27–40.
Mohamad, F., Anuar, N., & Shidrah Mat Daud, N. (2022). Factors Influencing Academic Writing Behaviour Among Undergraduates. International Journal of English Language Education, 10(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v10i2.20453
Morley, G. D. (2000). Syntax in Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Lexicogrammar in Systemic Linguistics. In Book. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Oc5pxu7VcZQC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Syntax+in+Functional+Grammar:+An+introduction+to+lexicogrammar+in+systemic+linguistics&ots=oJK7INaS4r&sig=6DiHmS2Uiwwzop_aFF-gwExcFFY
Nurhayati, D. A. W. (2020). Research methodology. Akademi Pustaka.
Ompusunggu, R. (2016). The Study of Adjective Phrase in the Seventeen Magazines’ Articles. The Episteme Journal of English Literature and Linguistics, 3(1), 1–26.
Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to Academic Writing. In Pearson Education Limited (Third Edit). PEARSON Longman. https://edisclipnes.usp.br/plueginefile.php/3928474/mod_resource/content/1/IntroductiontoAcademicWriting.pdf
Pratiwi, A., Arsyad, S., & Syafryadin, S. (2022). A Comparative Study on Sentence Characters of Research Introductions by Indonesian Authors in Applied Linguistics. Journal of Language and Literature, 22(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v22i1.3502
Princess, P., & Syarif, H. (2021). EFL University Students’ Errors in Constructing Complex Sentences in Academic Writing. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT-8 2020), 579, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210914.007
Purba, C. R., Yulia, A., Sari, P., Pangaribuan, W., & Pane, I. I. I. (2023). Article Sentence Analysis: Use of Clauses and Phrases in Scientific Sentences. Linguistica, 12(01), 19–25.
Purba, D. R., . S., & Pulungan, R. (2017). A Comparative Study of Types of Conjunctions Used in the Results and Discussion Section of Students’ Ras and Teflin Jas Published in 2015. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 1(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.1.1.65-73
Puspita, C. (2019). Factors Affecting Students’ Difficuties in Writing Thesis Mixed-Methods Research at Eighth Semester of English Study Program in IAIN Curup. 3rd English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings, 3, 13–22. https://doi.org/https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/article/view/4683/4210
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman.
Rahmi, M., Saun, S., & Adnan, A. (2016). A Study of Sentence Types on the Writing of English Department Students. Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(1). http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jelt
Saragih, W., & Natalia, C. H. (2016). Types of Sentences Used by Male and Female Writers in Journal Article Abstracts.
Sari, I. D., Syarif, H., & Amri, Z. (2019). An Analysis of Compound Sentences in Students’ Writing. Seventh International Conference on Language and Arts, 301(Icla 2018), 341–348.
Sari, W. G., & Dafit, F. (2021). The Role of Teachers in Simple Sentence Writing Learning for Primary School Students. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 9490(3), 0–5. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.1045
Sarwat, S., Ullah, N., ANjum, H. M. S., & Bhuttah, T. M. (2021). Problems and Factors Affecting Students English Writing Skills at Elementary Level. Elementary Education Online, 20(5), 3079–3086. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.332
Setyani, E. D., Bunau, E., & Rezeki, Y. S. (2023). The Influence of Grammarly towards Indonesian EFL Students ’ First -Degree Thesis Writing Confidence. ELSYA, 5(1), 54–67.
Shakuntala, R. (2017). Problems in Learning Syntatic Aspects of Language and Remedial Teaching Measures. Muallim Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 1(1), 1–11.
Suhendra, E., Pertiwi, S. A., & Zaini, N. (2022). Syntactic Analysis of Sentence Structure in “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey.” Humanitatis : Journal of Language and Literature, 8(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v8i2.1635
Sukandi, S. S., & Merina, Y. (2017). Reflecting the Percentage of Sentence Types in EFL Students’ Paragraph Writing Assignments: A Descriptive Study on Pedagogical Outcomes of Learning English Writing. Proceedings of the Fifth International Seminar on English Language and Teaching, 28, 187–199.
Sulasti, Y. (n.d.). The Structure of the Paragraph Written.
Utari, H. I., Zulkarnain, I., & Sihite, M. R. (2021). The Students’ Ability to Identify Nominal and Verbal Sentences in English of Grade Viii. EXCELLENCE: Journal of English and English Education, 1(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.47662/ejeee.v1i1.65
Warni, D., & Rozimela, Y. (2017). An Analysis of the Complex Sentences Used in the Theses Written by English Department Graduates of March 2017 Period in Universitas Negeri Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(1). http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jelt
Winda, M., Oktaviani, A., & Yulfi. (2019). An Analysis of Students’ Problems in Writing an Essay on Third Semester Students of English Education Study Program at STKIP PGRI Lubuklinggau. Journal of English Education Literature and Linguistics, 2, No. 2, 7823–7830.
Wulandari, D. (2023). The Analysis of the Students’ Error in Differentiating Between Nominal and Verbal Sentences in English Songs Lyric. JIMPS: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(4), 2023. Hlm. 3893-3896 P-ISSN: 2964-7231, E-ISSN: 2614-3658 DOI: Https://Doi.Org/10.24815/Jimps.V8i4.26506, 8(4).
- Author retains the copyright and grants Elsya Journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).