Peer Reviewers

Prof. Dr. Fathu Rahman, M.Hum., | Scopus ID: 57205243994 | ORCID | Universitas Hasanuddin (Unhas), Makassar, Indonesia

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Xavier Thayalan | Scopus ID: 41762818300 | ORCID | Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

Assoc Prof. Dr. Faridah Noor Mohd Noor, | Scopus ID: 56114135900 | ORCID | Universiti Malaya (UM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Prof. Tengku Silvana Sinar, MA., PhD., | Scopus ID: 57193063245 | ORCID | Universitas Sumatera Utara (USU), Medan, Indonesia

Dr. Liesna Andriany, M.Pd. | Scopus ID: 57202054740 | SINTA ID : 6007830 | Universitas Islam Al-Azhar (Unizar), Medan, Indonesia

Prof. Dr. Achmad Hufad, | Scopus ID: 57191488887 | ORCID | Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), Bandung, Indonesia

Dr. Abdul Gafur Marzuki, M.Pd. | Scopus ID: 57202442507 | SINTA ID: 5988566 | ORCIDInstitut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palu, Indonesia

Dr. Susy Deliani, M Hum., | SINTA ID : 6041838 | Google Scholar | Universitas Islam Al-Wasliyah, Medan, Indonesia

Dr. Ida Bagus Nyoman Mantra, S.H., S.Pd., M.Pd. | Scopus ID: 6602175341 | SINTA ID : 6003817 | Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar, Denpasar, Indonesia

Dr. Ngusman Abdul Manaf, M. Hum. | SINTA ID : 6170756 | Google Scholar | Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP), Padang, Indonesia

Châu Thị Hoàng Hoa, PhD | ORCID | Google Scholar | Tra Vinh University, Tra Vinh, Viet Nam

David Bwire, PhD | The College of New Jersey (TCNJ), Ewing, United States of America

Associate Prof. Dr. Nafan Tarihoran | ORCID | Google Scholar | Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin (UIN SMH), Banten, Indonesia

Tuan Sarifah Aini Syed Ahmad, PhD | ORCID | Google Scholar | Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peer Reviewing Guidelines

As reviewers, your aim is to provide authors with constructive feedback so that they can make improvements to their work. Use the Comment function on Microsoft Word to enter your comments. Ensure that the username of your Word software do not contain your identity. Use the Track Change function if you are editing the body text directly.

Keep in mind that the manuscript sent to you is a privileged confidential document. This means that you cannot use the information obtained during the peer-review process for your own or any other person or organisation's advantage or disadvantage.

Elsya Journal's peer review process is double blind, thus conflict of interests and discriminination of nationality/gender/belief can be avoided. Therefore, reviewers must not write their names or afiliations in their feedback comments.

Your review will help the Editor decide whether or not to publish the article:

  • Does the paper provide insight into an important issue, especially a recent issue?
  • Does the paper tell a good story?
  • Is the paper interesting for an international audience?
  • Does the insight from the paper stimulate new, important questions?
  • Is there a high probability that the paper will be read and cited by others?

Your comments in the Open Journal System review dashboard

  • Remember that authors will welcome positive feedback as well as constructive criticism from you.
  • Your comments for the “Editor only” will not be sent to the author.
  • If you have further insight or need rectify part of your review, please Add Discussion and the Editor or Section Editor will correspond with you.