Teaching Maritime English for Safety Communication: Evidence from Vessel Traffic Service Operation

Nursyam Nursyam; Sarce Sampe   Bungin; Albertha Lolo   Tandung; Rachmat   Tjahjanto

doi:10.31849/acsp6k05

Authors

Nursyam Nursyam Politeknik Pelayaran Barombong, Makassar, Indonesia
Sarce Sampe Bungin Politeknik Pelayaran Barombong, Makassar, Indonesia
Albertha Lolo Tandung Politeknik Pelayaran Barombong, Makassar, Indonesia
Rachmat Tjahjanto Politeknik Pelayaran Barombong, Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31849/acsp6k05

Keywords:

Maritime communication, Operational implementation, SMCP adherence, Standard marine , Communication phrases, Vessel traffic service

Abstract

Effective use of Maritime English is essential for maintaining navigational safety and preventing communication failures in international waters, particularly within Vessel Traffic Service environments where real time decisions influence vessel movements and risk levels. Despite the global adoption of Standard Marine Communication Phrases as a safety protocol, there remains limited empirical evidence on how these phrases are enacted in authentic operational settings and how such practices inform the teaching of Maritime English. This study investigates the real-world application of Maritime English for safety communication at Benoa Vessel Traffic Service in Indonesia. Using a qualitative descriptive design, data were generated through analysis of five communication transcripts, eleven semi structured interviews with operators, and three days of field observations. Findings reveal selective adherence to standard phrases during routine procedures, frequent shifts to simplified English and code switching in complex multilingual situations, and pragmatic prioritization of clarity and time sensitive coordination over strict protocol. These patterns highlight gaps between prescribed language taught in training and communicative realities faced by operators. The study contributes empirical insight for refining Maritime English pedagogy by integrating authentic communication tasks, simulation of multilingual scenarios, and training for adaptive yet safety-oriented language practices. In a broader context, the findings reinforce the importance of aligning ESP curriculum design with real operational discourse to support global maritime safety and enhance English language preparedness among future maritime professionals.

Author Biographies

Nursyam Nursyam, Politeknik Pelayaran Barombong, Makassar, Indonesia

Nursyam is a dedicated Maritime English lecturer at Politeknik Pelayaran Barombong, Makassar, Indonesia. Passionate about improving communication competence in maritime operations, she inspires cadets to become globally minded and safety-driven seafarers. Her work bridges language theory and real-world practice, emphasizing Standard Marine Communication Phrases and authentic ship-to-shore communication.
Sarce Sampe Bungin, Politeknik Pelayaran Barombong, Makassar, Indonesia

Sarce Sampe Bungin is a senior Maritime English lecturer at Politeknik Pelayaran Barombong, Makassar, Indonesia, teaching across both Nautical and Engine programs. Her academic interests lie in English language pedagogy, Maritime English training, and applied communication practices in real maritime settings, including shipboard interaction and vessel-to-VTS communication. Through her teaching, research, and publications, she advocates for communication excellence as a core pillar of maritime safety and professionalism.
Albertha Lolo Tandung, Politeknik Pelayaran Barombong, Makassar, Indonesia

Albertha Lolo Tandung is a senior lecturer in the Nautical Science Program at Barombong Maritime Polytechnic, Makassar, Indonesia. With extensive expertise in navigation, maritime safety, and leadership, she has dedicated her career to shaping competent and safety-focused future seafarers. Her research explores the implementation of Standard Marine Communication Phrases, strengthening alumni networks, and enhancing cadets’ professional competencies in the global merchant marine sector.
Rachmat Tjahjanto, Politeknik Pelayaran Barombong, Makassar, Indonesia

Rachmat Tjahjanto is a senior lecturer in Navigation at Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Makassar, Indonesia. Drawing from extensive professional seafaring and maritime education experience, he teaches key subjects in navigation safety, emergency response at sea, and deck-department competencies. His instructional approach integrates theory with hands-on training, ensuring cadets develop the technical skills, situational awareness, and discipline required to serve as competent and safety-driven officers onboard. His research interests focus on maritime safety enhancement, operational efficiency, and professional excellence in shipping.

References

Adikwu, F., Esiri, A., Aderamo, A., Akano, O., & Erhueh, O. (2024). Evaluating safety culture and its HR implications in maritime operations: Current state and future directions. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(11), 3755–3777. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i11.1718

Alderton, T., & Saieva, G. (2013). Improving VTS operator training: A human factors approach. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(3), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2013.782218

Aylward, K., Johannesson, A., Weber, R., MacKinnon, S. N., & Lundh, M. (2020). An evaluation of low-level automation navigation functions upon vessel traffic services work practices. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 19(3), 313–335.* https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-020-00206-y (SpringerLink)

Barus, I., Simanjuntak, R., Siahaan, R., Toko, G., & Resmayasari, I. (2024). Cultural and linguistic challenges in global maritime education (navigating English usage). Meteor STIP Marunda, 17(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.36101/msm.v17i1.358

Beatty-Martínez, A. L., Navarro-Torres, C. A., Dussias, P. E., Bajo, M. T., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Kroll, J. F. (2020). Interactional context mediates the consequences of bilingualism for language and cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(6), 1022–1047. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000770 (Google Sites)

Biletska, O., Lastovskyi, V., & Semchynskyy, K. (2021). Intercultural communication competence: International relations and diplomacy area. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 1664–1675. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS4.1874 (Academia)

Bocanegra-Valle, A. (2013). Maritime English: Specific purposes and intercultural communication. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 8(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2013.1174

Bocanegra-Valle, A. (2015). Globalization and maritime communication: The role of English as a lingua franca. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.002

Bocanegra-Valle, A. (2016). Maritime English as a lingua franca: Authenticity and intelligibility in communication at sea. English for Specific Purposes, 44, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.06.001

Çakır, G. (2020). Challenges in implementing Standard Marine Communication Phrases among seafarers. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 19(4), 591–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-020-00202-8

Calderone, A., Corallo, F., Cardile, D., Rifici, C., Caminiti, F., Conti-Nibali, V., … Calabrò, R. S. (2025). Adjustment disorders and quality of life in patients with tracheostomy and tracheal cannula: A scoping review. Brain and Behavior, 15(6), e70517. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70517

Chaal, M., BahooToroody, A., Basnet, S., Banda, O., & Goerlandt, F. (2022). Towards system-theoretic risk assessment for future ships: A framework for selecting risk control options. Ocean Engineering, 259, 111797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111797

Chauvin, C., Lardjane, S., Morel, G., Clostermann, J.-P., & Langard, B. (2013). Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: Analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 59, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.006 (PubMed)

Cole, C. (2010). The relevance of Standard Marine Communication Phrases in modern shipping. Journal of Maritime Research, 7(1), 15–28.

Dadà, M., Mellal, M., Makhloufi, A., & Belhouchet, H. (2020). A field development strategy for the joint optimization of flow allocations, well placements and well trajectories. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 39(1), 502–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144598720974425

Fabian-Perona, E. (2025). Maritime education and language as the acting link between bridge and engine room: A report. Educational Role of Language Journal, 13(1), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.36534/erlj.2025.01.07 (ResearchGate)

Filina-Dawidowicz, L., & Durczak, W. (2023). Organization of vessel traffic on dredged Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway: VTS operators’ viewpoint on the use of infrastructure for ships passing. European Research Studies Journal, 26(3), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/3203

Frolova, O. (2021). Teaching Standard Maritime Communication Phrases at Maritime English lessons. Humanities Science Current Issues, 7(35), 232–236. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/35-7-38

Hetherington, C., Flin, R., & Mearns, K. (2006). Safety in shipping: The human element. Journal of Safety Research, 37(4), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2006.04.007

Hu, J., Hong, Y., Jin, Q., Zhao, G., & Lu, H. (2023). An efficient dual-stage compression model for maritime safety information based on BeiDou short-message communication. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(8), 1521. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11081521 (MDPI)

International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities. (2016). IALA VTS manual (6th ed.). IALA.

International Maritime Organization. (2002). IMO SMCP: IMO Standard Marine Communication Phrases. IMO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.62454/KA987E (imo-epublications.org)

Ismail, Z., Arifin, K., Darus, F., Muhamad, M., & Arifin, N. (2023). Factor analysis approach for measuring safety culture in a research university in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 19(S18), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.47836/mjmhs19.s18.10

Janša, V., Pušić, M., Frangež, H., & Rižner, T. (2023). TGFBI as a candidate biomarker for non-invasive diagnosis of early-stage endometriosis. Human Reproduction, 38(7), 1284–1296. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead091

Jiang, W., Liang, C., & Han, W. (2019). Relevance proof of safety culture in coal mine industry. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(5), 835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050835 (MDPI)

Kahveci, E., Lane, T., & Sampson, H. (2017). Communication, culture, and safety in the maritime industry: The role of VTS operators. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-017-0119-4

Kang, H. (2019). Communication practices of Vessel Traffic Service operators under time pressure. Journal of Navigation, 72(5), 1150–1166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463319000256

Kogan, L. R., Accornero, V. H., Gelb, E., & Slater, M. R. (2021). Community veterinary medicine programs: Pet owners’ perceptions and experiences. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, 678595. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.678595 (PMC)

Marhandani, D. (2021). Local language dominance in SMCP training: An Indonesian perspective. Maritime English Journal, 10(1), 45–59.

Mazaheri, A., Montewka, J., & Kujala, P. (2013). Modeling the risk of ship collisions by examining vessel traffic services and human factors. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 124, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.01.017

Mialkovska, L., Чернета, С., Zabiiaka, I., Maiboroda, O., Silvestrova, O., & Voitenko, I. (2024). Effective communication: Digital, informational, sociolinguistic aspects (European experience). International Journal of Religion, 5(4), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.61707/v7tm3p78

Moullin, J. C., Dickson, K. S., Stadnick, N. A., Rabin, B., & Aarons, G. A. (2019). Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Implementation Science, 14, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6 (BioMed Central)

Msomi, N. L., Barath, S., & Ross, A. J. (2025). Speech and language therapists’ perceptions of corporate practice in South Africa. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 72(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v72i1.1100

Poe, G., Thomas, K., Kiser, R., Saathoff, K., Serdynski, L., & Mathew, C. (2019). Abstract 262: Factors influencing the adoption of Get With The Guidelines® quality improvement registries: Findings from a regional survey. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 12(Suppl_1), A262. https://doi.org/10.1161/HCQ.12.SUPPL_1.262

Pritchard, B. (2009). The use of SMCP in maritime training: A cadet perspective. Journal of Maritime Education and Training, 11(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702430903030101

Pritchard, B. (2020). Revisiting SMCP in modern shipping: Effectiveness and limitations. Journal of Maritime Education and Training, 16(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702420.2020.1735257

Proctor, R. (2014). Maritime communication failures and their role in accidents. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 13(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-014-0066-9 (SciSpace)

Pujiastuti, I., Damayanti, V., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromihardjo, A. (2023). The importance of reading skill for maritime literacy: A literature review. BIO Web of Conferences, 79, 09003. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20237909003

Ranjbar, A., Khalaji, M., & Shafiee, M. (2015). Cadets’ adherence to Standard Marine Communication Phrases under time pressure. Maritime Policy & Management, 42(6), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2015.1011250

Saridaki, E. (2023). The necessity of Maritime English for the shipping industry. Journal of Academic Social Resources, 8(45), 1908–1913. https://doi.org/10.29228/asrjournal.67256

Schröder-Hinrichs, J.-U., Hollnagel, E., & Baldauf, M. (2012). From Titanic to Costa Concordia: A century of lessons not learned. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 11(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-012-0032-3

Sijabat, P., Simanjuntak, M., Mudakir, M., Putrawan, B., & Lumingkewas, M. (2024). Empowering literacy in maritime education: Strategies and professionalism alignment. Meteor STIP Marunda, 17(1), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.36101/msm.v17i1.359

Simanjuntak, M., Sijabat, P., Barasa, L., Malau, A., & Mudakir, M. (2024). Exploring English literacy and communication needs among new cadets in maritime education. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(1), 996–1003. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i1.6026

Smith, J., Yazdanpanah, F., Thistle, R., Musharraf, M., & Veitch, B. (2020). Capturing expert knowledge to inform decision support technology for marine operations. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(9), 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8090689

Stankov, B., & Stankov, S. (2019). Training seafarers in Standard Marine Communication Phrases: Challenges and perspectives. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(7), 843–860. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2019.1611807

Sutopo, D. (2021). Balancing protocol and clarity in maritime communication: A case study of Indonesian seafarers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i2.28905

Tang, L., & Zhang, P. (2021). Human factors in VTS communication: Lessons from accident reports. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 20(3), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-021-00251-7

Trenkner, P., & Cole, C. (2018). Standard Marine Communication Phrases: Still relevant? WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 17(3), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-018-0150-7

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2023). Review of maritime transport 2023. United Nations. https://unctad.org/publication/review-maritime-transport-2023

Veitch, E., & Alsos, O. A. (2021). Human-centered explainable artificial intelligence for marine autonomous surface vehicles. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(11), 1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9111227 (MDPI)

Wei, T., Feng, W., Chen, Y., Wang, C.-X., Ge, N., & Lü, J. (2021). Hybrid satellite-terrestrial communication networks for the maritime Internet of Things: Key technologies, opportunities, and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(11), 8910–8934. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3056091

Wicaksono, M., & Saraswati, N. (2024). Social emotional learning in ELT: Opportunities and challenges. Global Expert Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 12(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.36982/jge.v12i1.4427

Wu, B., & Morris, J. (2020). Communication failures and safety culture in the maritime industry. Safety Science, 130, Article 104895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104895

Xu, G., Chen, C., Li, F., & Qiu, X. (2020). AIS data analytics for adaptive rotating shift in vessel traffic service. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(4), 749–767. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-01-2019-0056

Yadav, S. (2025). Hybrid cloud strategies for SAP ERP modernization: Bridging S/4HANA and legacy systems. International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 38(3S), 1114–1129. https://doi.org/10.12732/ijam.v38i3s.207

Yasrab, R., Fu, Z., Zhao, H., Lee, L., Sharma, H., Drukker, L., … Noble, J. A. (2023). A machine learning method for automated description and workflow analysis of first-trimester ultrasound scans. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 42(5), 1301–1313. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2022.3226274

Yu, Y., Xu, X., Qi, M., Dang, J., Qu, H., Roy, N., … Liu, Y. (2025). Measuring the safety climate in China’s chemical industry and investigating the influencing factors: A case study of a large enterprise. Process Safety Progress, 44(1), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12668

Yudianto, P., Robbi, S., & Dahri, M. (2024). Analysis of data communication networks for VTS Surabaya in Class I Type A Navigation District Tanjung Perak. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 5(11), 2924–2933. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v5i11.1505

Zehentner, E. (2022). Ambiguity avoidance as a factor in the rise of the English dative alternation. Cognitive Linguistics, 33(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0018