Unraveling the Power of Written Feedback: A Meta-Synthesis on Student Academic Writing

Fahrus Zaman   Fadhly; Dadang   Solihat; Marwito Wihadi

doi:10.31849/n66j6w65

Authors

Fahrus Zaman Fadhly Universitas Kuningan, Kuningan, Indonesia.
Dadang Solihat Universitas Kuningan, Kuningan, Indonesia.
Marwito Wihadi Universitas Kuningan, Kuningan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31849/n66j6w65

Keywords:

Written feedback, Academic writing, Formative feedback, Summative feedback, Corrective feedback, Feedback delivery methods

Abstract

A single written comment can redirect a learner’s academic trajectory, yet evidence on which written feedback practices most effectively improve student academic writing remains dispersed across studies, contexts, and delivery modalities. This study addresses that gap by integrating findings on feedback types, feedback delivery, and contextual influences to clarify how written feedback supports academic writing development, particularly in EFL settings. Employing a qualitative meta synthesis, we reviewed 25 peer reviewed studies published between 2017 and 2024, selected through explicit inclusion criteria and appraised for methodological quality, then analysed using thematic coding to generate higher order interpretive themes. Findings show that formative feedback most consistently supports improvement because it guides revision decisions, scaffolds self-regulation, and builds writer confidence; in contrast, summative feedback and corrective feedback contribute mainly to evaluation and linguistic accuracy and are less likely to generate durable gains when used alone. Across delivery methods, teacher feedback, automated tools, and web platforms show potential, but impact is strongest when technology mediated input is paired with teacher mediation and clear explanation. The synthesis further indicates that student emotions and culturally shaped expectations condition trust, engagement, and whether feedback is translated into substantive textual change. The study contributes an integrated framework that treats feedback effectiveness as a system linking purpose, medium, affect, and context, with implications for feedback design, teacher feedback literacy, and responsible digital feedback policy in higher education. Future research should test which iterative feedback features drive lasting improvement and how hybrid human and intelligent feedback can be optimised for equitable learning.

Author Biographies

Fahrus Zaman Fadhly, Universitas Kuningan, Kuningan, Indonesia.

Dr. Fahrus Zaman Fadhly is a faculty member of the English Education Department at the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Kuningan. His teaching and research interests include English Language Teaching, Academic Writing, Creative Writing, English for Journalism, and Language and Media Studies. He is passionate about developing innovative pedagogical approaches that integrate creativity and critical literacy to enhance students’ communicative competence and academic writing proficiency.
Dadang Solihat, Universitas Kuningan, Kuningan, Indonesia.

Dr. Dadang Solihat is a faculty member of the English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education (FKIP), Universitas Kuningan. His research and teaching interests include English for Specific Purposes (ESP), English education, and teaching English to young learners (TEYL). He is dedicated to developing effective pedagogical strategies that enhance language learning across various educational contexts.
Marwito Wihadi, Universitas Kuningan, Kuningan, Indonesia

Dr. Marwito Wihadi is a faculty member of the English Education Department at the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Kuningan. His research interests include Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), Discourse Analysis, the Appraisal System, and the teaching of writing. He has contributed to various academic forums focusing on linguistic approaches to language education and strives to enhance students’ analytical and writing competencies through functional perspectives in language learning.

References

Akkuş, G. B., & Altay, I. F. (2023). Instructor’s written feedback in emergency remote teaching: EFL learners’ perspectives. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 12(1), 47-56.

Aridah, A., Atmowardoyo, H., & Salija, K. (2017). Teacher practices and students’ preferences for written corrective feedback and their implications on writing instruction. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(1), 1923-8703.

Atmaca, Ç. (2016). Contrasting perceptions of students and teachers: written corrective feedback. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 12(2), 166-182.

Babcock, R.D., & Thonus, T. (2018). Researching the writing center: Towards an evidence-based practice. Peter Lang.

Baş, G., & Şentürk, C. (2019). Teachers’ educational beliefs and curriculum orientations: A relational research. Teachers and Curriculum, 19(1), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.15663/tandc.v19i1.336

Benson, S., & DeKeyser, R. (2019). Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy. Language Teaching Research, 23(6), 702-726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818770921

Bozkurt, S., & Acar, Z. C. (2017). EFL students’ reflections on explicit and implicit written corrective feedback. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 7, 98-102.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Teacher written feedback on English as a foreign language learners’ writing: Examining native and nonnative English-speaking teachers’ practices in feedback provision. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 629921.

Chen, W., & Gao, J. (2024). Creating an online community of inquiry: learner practice and perceptions of community-based feedback giving in academic writing. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 37(3), 493-520.

Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N. (2018) Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches. 4th Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks.

Dison, A., and Collett, K. S. (2019). Decentering and recentering the writing centre using online feedback: Towards a collaborative model of integrating academic literacies development. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, 2019(57), 79-98.

Donnelly, R., Kennelly, I., & McAvinia, C. (2024). A multimodal framework for supporting academic writers’ perspectives, practice and performance. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(4), 936-952.

Eckstein, G., Coca, K., Lung, Y. S. M., & McMurry, B. L. (2024). Praise in written feedback: How L2 writers perceive and value praise. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 40(2), 135-151.

Fadhly, F. (2021). Synthesizing effective strategies for IT-mediated writing: A meta-ethnographic study. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 6(2), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v6i2.610

Fadhly, F. (2022). Extensive reading as a gateway to create research gap: Valuable lessons from Indonesian expert authors. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 7(2), 397-413.

Fadhly, F. Z. & Muziatun, Manan, N. A., Acesta, A., Solihat, D. (2023). An academic writing model: Lessons learned from experienced writers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 870-880.

Fadhly, F. Z. & Ratnaningsih, N. (2018). Reconstruction of cognitive process in popular article writing. Asian EFL Journal 20(5), 7-33.

Fadhly, F. Z. (2022). Formulating research problem in academic writing: Indonesian expert authors’ cognitive experience. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 215-233

Fadhly, F. Z. Hasanah, N. & Agustiana, V. (2017). Mental process of writing for academic purposes: A case study of Indonesian writers. Indonesian EFL Journal 3(2), 203-214.

Fadhly, F. Z., Emzir, Lustyantie, N. (2018). Exploring cognitive process of research topic selection in academic writing. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7(1), 157-166. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v7i1.1535

Fadhly, Z. F. (2023). Enhancing the academic writing of EFL learners: An analysis of effective strategies through meta-synthesis. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 397-410

Fink, A. (2019). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. Sage Publications.

Geng, F., & Yu, S. (2024). Exploring doctoral students’ emotions in feedback on academic writing: a critical incident perspective. Studies in Continuing Education, 46(1), 1-19.

Glazzard, J. & Stones, S. (2019). Student perceptions of feedback in higher education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.11.3

Grimm, N. M. (2024). Retheorizing writing center work to transform a system of advantage based on race. In Landmark Essays in Contemporary Writing Center Studies (pp. 119-138). Routledge.

Hao, Q. and Tsikerdekis, M., (2019). How automated feedback is delivered matters: Formative feedback and knowledge transfer. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028686.

Hattie, J. and Clarke, S. (2018). Visible learning: Feedback. Routledge.

Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Boud, D. (2020). Developing student competence through peer assessment: the role of feedback, self-regulation and evaluative judgement. Higher Education, 80(1), 137-156.

Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), 541-577. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102004023

Kerr, P. (2020). Giving feedback to language learners. Cambridge University Press.

Lee, I., Yu, S., & Liu, Y. (2018). Hong Kong secondary students’ motivation in EFL writing: A survey study. TESOL Quarterly, 52(1), 176-187.

Li, A. W. (2024). Bilingual returnee scholars’ identity in academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 64, 101112.

Li, S. (2018). Data collection in the research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback: A synthetic and critical review. In A. Gudmestad, & A. Edmonds (Eds), Critical reflections on data in second language acquisition (pp. 33-62). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in system. System, 84, 93–109.

Malterud, K. (2019). Qualitative metasynthesis: A research method for medicine and health sciences. Routledge.

Mao, S. S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Investigating written corrective feedback: (Mis)alignment of teachers’ beliefs and practice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.05.004

Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2020). Feedback scope in written corrective feedback: Analysis of empirical research in L2 contexts. Assessing Writing, 45, 100469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100469

Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2024). Student engagement with written feedback: Critical issues and way forward. RELC Journal, 55(3), 810-818.

Maphoto, K. B., Sevnarayan, K., Mohale, N. E., Suliman, Z., Ntsopi, T. J., & Mokoena, D. (2024). Advancing students' academic excellence in distance education: Exploring the potential of generative AI integration to improve academic writing skills. Open Praxis, 16(2), 142-159.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. 4th ed. Jossey-Bass.

Mohamadi, Z. (2018). Comparative effect of online summative and formative assessment on EFL student writing ability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.003

Nuraeni, I. & Fadhly, F. Z. (2017). Creative process in fiction writing of three Indonesian writers. Indonesian EFL Journal 2(2), 117-126

Nuraeni, I., & Fadhly, F. Z. (2016). Creative process in fiction writing of three Indonesian writers. Indonesian EFL Journal, 2(2), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v2i2.644

Nurkamto, J., Prihandoko, L. A., Putro, N. H. P. S., & Purwati, O. (2024). Academic writing apprehension in higher education: A systematic review. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(1), 14-247.

Ofte, I. (2024). Collective meaning-making in collegial conversations: teacher educators’ talk about students’ academic writing. Education Inquiry, 15(2), 260-278.

Olsen, T., & Hunnes, J. (2024). Improving students’ learning, the role of formative feedback: experiences from a crash course for business students in academic writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(2), 129-141.

Plaindaren, C., & Shah, P. M. (2019). A study on the effectiveness of written feedback in writing tasks among upper secondary school pupils. Creative Education, 10, 3491-3508. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1013269

Rababah, I., & Rababah, L. (2018). The actual use of brainstorming strategy among teachers of Arabic for speakers of other languages in writing classes. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 133-143. 10.5539/ijel.v9n1p15

Rababah, L. (2018). An adapted version of torrance test of creative thinking (TTCT) in EFL/ESL writing: A rubric scoring and a review of studies. International Journal of English and Education, 7(2), 128-136.

Rababah, L. (2022). Contextualization to enhance students’ writing ability. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(11), 22-32.

Rababah, L., & Banikalef, (2019). The use of valuing strategies into enhancing creativity in EFL writing. Education and Linguistics Research, 5(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.5296/elr.v5i1.14507

Rababah, L., Alshehab, M., & Bani Melhem, N. (2018). Exploring the factors that hinder Jordanian students in developing creativity in EFL writing. International Journal of English and Education,7(3), 161-170.

Rasool, U., Qian, J., Saqlain, M., & Abbasi, B. N. (2022). Written corrective feedback strategies: A systematic review. Voyage Journal of Educational Studies, 2(2), 67-83.

Rowe, A. D., & Zegwaard, K. E. (2017). Developing graduate employability skills and attributes: Curriculum enhancement through work-integrated learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 18(2), 87-99. https://hdl.handle.net/10289/11267

Ryan, T., & Henderson, M. (2018). Feeling feedback: Students’ emotional responses to educator feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 880-892. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1416456

Smith, E. N., Romero, C., Donovan, B., Herter, R., Paunesku, D., Cohen, G. L., Dweck, C. S., & Gross, J. J. (2018). Emotion theories and adolescent well-being: Results of an online intervention. Emotion, 18(6), 781-788. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000379

Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x

Wei, W., Cheong, C. M., Zhu, X., & Lu, Q. (2024). Comparing self-reflection and peer feedback practices in an academic writing task: a student self-efficacy perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(4), 896-912.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Yulianti, I. & Fadhly, F. Z., (2020). Learning through learners: Indonesian EFL learners’ writing strategies experiences. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 3(2), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v3i2.3680

Zhang, Z., & Xu, L. (2024). Student engagement with automated feedback on academic writing: A study on Uyghur ethnic minority students in China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(8), 3466-3479.