Penerapan Asas Kemanfaatan Dalam Putusan Dispensasi Kawin Menurut Perma Nomor 5 Tahun 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31849/nmtqnh34Keywords:
Principle of Utility, Marriage Dispensation, Child Protection, Judicial RulingAbstract
Child marriage remains a significant issue in Indonesia despite the increase in the minimum marriage age through Law Number 16 of 2019. Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 was enacted to guide judges in handling marriage dispensation cases; however, it may also create opportunities for the legalization of child marriage. This study examines the application of the principle of utility in marriage dispensation decisions and its implications for child protection through a normative juridical approach and case study analysis of five Religious Court decisions. The findings reveal that judges tend to prioritize utility over legal certainty, although its application is inconsistent. Decisions granting dispensation are generally based on social and moral considerations, while decisions rejecting it emphasize the child's long-term welfare. Marriage dispensation produces various legal and social consequences, including the legalization of marriage, administrative registration, and risks to children's psychological well-being, reproductive health, and education. Therefore, clearer legal standards and the involvement of professional experts are needed in the examination of marriage dispensation applications.
References
Buku dan Jurnal
Asnawi, M. N. (2014). Hermeneutika putusan hakim. UII Press.
Azzopardi, P., et al. (2019). Progress in adolescent health and wellbeing: Tracking 12 headline indicators for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016. The Lancet.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020). Statistik kesejahteraan rakyat. BPS.
Darroch, J., Woog, V., Bankole, A., & Ashford, L. S. (2016). Adolescent pregnancy and its outcomes across countries. Guttmacher Institute.
Hamzah, A. (1986). Kamus hukum. Ghalia Indonesia.
Huda, N. (2016). Hukum tata negara Indonesia. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
International Planned Parenthood Federation and The Forum on Marriage and The Rights of Women and Girls. (2007). Ending child marriage: A guide for global policy action. IPPF.
Lumbuun, R. S. (2011). PERMA RI (Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia): Wujud kerancuan antara praktik pembagian dan pemisahan kekuasaan. Rajawali Press.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Hukum acara perdata di Indonesia. Liberty.
Neal, S., Matthews, Z., Frost, M., et al. (2012). Adolescent first births in East Africa: Disaggregating characteristics, trends and determinants. Reproductive Health.
Radbruch, G. (1961). Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaft. K.F. Koehler Verlag.
Rahardjo, S. (2000). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Soekanto, S. (2015). Pengantar penelitian hukum. UI-Press.
Suprapto, P. H., et al. (2010). Menemukan substansi dalam keadilan prosedural. Komisi Yudisial R.I.
Sutedi, A. (2010). Hukum perizinan dalam sektor pelayanan publik. Sinar Grafika.
Tim Penyusun. (n.d.). Laporan tahunan Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan dan Putusan Pengadilan
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 tentang Pedoman Mengadili Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 22/PUU-XV/2017.
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Bengkulu Nomor 79/Pdt.P/2023/PA.Bhn.
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Sambas Nomor 412/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Sbs.
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Sijunjung Nomor 201/Pdt.P/2023/PA.SJJ.
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Sijunjung Nomor 203/Pdt.P/2023/PA.SJJ.
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Sukamara Nomor 33/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Skr.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.
