Ethics Statement

PUBLICATION ETHICS

Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis (JIEB) (E-ISSN: 2442-9813; P-ISSN: 1829-9822) is a peer-reviewed academic journal published by the Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia. JIEB is committed to maintaining high standards of publication ethics, academic integrity, transparency, fairness, confidentiality, and accountability throughout the scholarly publishing process. This Publication Ethics Policy is guided by the principles and best practices of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and applies to authors, editors, reviewers, and other parties involved in the publication process.

1. Authorship and Contributorship

JIEB recognizes authorship as both scholarly credit and academic responsibility. Authorship must reflect substantial intellectual contributions to the research and manuscript and must not be assigned solely on the basis of academic position, institutional affiliation, supervision, funding, or other non-substantive relationships.

An individual should be listed as an author only if they have made a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the study, data collection, analysis or interpretation of data, development of the theoretical framework, or other significant intellectual aspects of the manuscript.

Authors are also expected to participate in drafting the manuscript or critically revising it for important intellectual content, approve the final version, and accept responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the work.

The corresponding author is responsible for communicating with the JIEB Editorial Office and confirming that:

  1. All listed authors have made appropriate contributions to the manuscript.

  2. All authors have approved the submitted and final versions of the manuscript.

  3. All authors have agreed to the submission and publication of the manuscript.

  4. The order of authors has been agreed upon by all authors.

  5. Any changes to authorship are communicated to and approved by all affected authors.

JIEB does not permit guest authorship, honorary authorship, or ghost authorship.

Individuals who have contributed to the research but do not meet the criteria for authorship should be acknowledged appropriately, with their permission.

Any request to add, remove, or rearrange authors after submission must be justified in writing and approved by all affected authors. The Editor-in-Chief may request additional documentation before approving such changes.

2. Complaints and Appeals

JIEB is committed to handling complaints and appeals fairly, transparently, promptly, and impartially.

Authors, reviewers, readers, editors, and other stakeholders may submit complaints concerning editorial decisions, peer-review procedures, publication processes, authorship, conflicts of interest, research integrity, or other matters relating to the journal.

Complaints and appeals should be submitted to the Editor-in-Chief or Editorial Office through the official journal contact channel and should include sufficient information and supporting evidence, where applicable.

The journal will:

  1. Acknowledge receipt of a complaint or appeal.

  2. Assess the matter objectively and independently.

  3. Investigate relevant evidence.

  4. Consult editors, reviewers, authors, institutional representatives, or independent experts when necessary.

  5. Maintain confidentiality throughout the investigation.

  6. Communicate the outcome and rationale to the relevant parties.

An appeal against an editorial decision must provide substantive grounds, new evidence, or demonstrate a possible procedural or ethical problem in the original decision.

Disagreement with an editor's or reviewer's scholarly judgment alone does not ordinarily constitute sufficient grounds for an appeal.

Where appropriate, the Editor-in-Chief may assign an appeal to an independent editor who was not involved in the original decision. Editorial decisions made following a properly conducted peer-review process are normally final, except where evidence of procedural error, reviewer misconduct, an undisclosed conflict of interest, or other circumstances indicates that the decision may have been compromised.

3. Allegations of Research Misconduct

JIEB takes allegations of research misconduct seriously and is committed to protecting the integrity of the scholarly record.

Research misconduct may include, but is not limited to:

  • Fabrication of data or research findings.

  • Falsification or manipulation of data, evidence, or research procedures.

  • Plagiarism or substantial unattributed use of another person's work.

  • Duplicate or redundant publication.

  • Inappropriate text recycling or self-plagiarism.

  • Citation manipulation.

  • Manipulation of the peer-review process.

  • Fraudulent, inappropriate, or misleading authorship.

  • Failure to disclose relevant conflicts of interest.

  • Unethical research involving human participants.

  • Unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential information.

  • Misrepresentation of research methods, results, or conclusions.

  • Other practices that violate accepted standards of responsible research and publication.

When an allegation is received, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct an initial assessment to determine whether further investigation is warranted.

Where necessary, the journal may request explanations, supporting documentation, original research materials, ethical approval documents, or other relevant evidence from the authors.

For serious allegations, the journal may refer the matter to the author's affiliated institution, research institution, funding body, or another competent authority.

Depending on the findings, JIEB may take one or more of the following actions:

  • Reject the manuscript.

  • Suspend the editorial process.

  • Request clarification or correction.

  • Require revisions.

  • Issue an Expression of Concern.

  • Publish a correction.

  • Retract a published article.

  • Notify the relevant institution or authority.

  • Take other appropriate measures to protect the integrity of the scholarly record.

The journal will not presume misconduct before sufficient evidence has been assessed.

4. Conflicts of Interest

JIEB requires authors, editors, and reviewers to disclose any actual, potential, or perceived conflict of interest that could influence, or reasonably be perceived to influence, the research, manuscript, peer-review process, editorial decision, or interpretation of findings.

Conflicts of interest may arise from:

  • Financial relationships or interests.

  • Employment or institutional affiliations.

  • Personal relationships.

  • Professional collaborations.

  • Academic competition.

  • Funding arrangements.

  • Commercial or consulting relationships.

  • Intellectual interests.

  • Other circumstances that may affect scholarly independence or impartiality.

Authors must disclose relevant conflicts of interest during manuscript submission. Where no conflicts exist, authors should provide an appropriate declaration stating that there are no conflicts of interest.

Editors and reviewers must disclose any conflict of interest before participating in the editorial or peer-review process. An editor or reviewer with a significant conflict should decline involvement with the manuscript.

A conflict of interest does not necessarily constitute misconduct. However, failure to disclose a relevant conflict may constitute a breach of publication ethics.

Where appropriate, disclosed conflicts of interest may be published alongside the article to promote transparency.

5. Data Sharing and Reproducibility

JIEB supports responsible research transparency and encourages authors to provide sufficient information for readers and other researchers to understand, evaluate, and, where applicable, reproduce the research process.

Authors of empirical studies should provide adequate information regarding:

  • Research design and objectives.

  • Data sources and collection procedures.

  • Variables, measurements, and research instruments.

  • Analytical methods and statistical procedures.

  • Methodological decisions and assumptions.

  • The basis for the reported findings and conclusions.

  • Relevant limitations of the research.

Where ethically, legally, and practically permissible, authors are encouraged to make supporting research data, instruments, or other materials available through an appropriate repository or upon reasonable request.

Data sharing must not compromise participant privacy, confidentiality, informed consent, ethical approval conditions, intellectual property rights, legal obligations, or the safety and welfare of research participants.

For quantitative, qualitative, conceptual, and literature-based studies, transparency and reproducibility should be addressed in ways appropriate to the research methodology. Authors should clearly identify relevant data sources, analytical procedures, theoretical frameworks, methodological assumptions, and limitations.

Authors remain responsible for the accuracy, integrity, and provenance of all data, sources, and materials presented in their manuscripts.

6. Ethical Oversight

JIEB requires research to comply with relevant ethical standards appropriate to its methodology, subject matter, and research context.

Research involving human participants, interviews, surveys, observations, personal information, sensitive data, or potentially vulnerable populations must comply with applicable institutional, national, and professional ethical requirements.

Where applicable, authors should provide information regarding:

  • Ethical approval or clearance.

  • The institution or committee granting ethical approval.

  • The approval or reference number, where available.

  • Informed consent procedures.

  • Measures taken to protect participants' privacy, confidentiality, dignity, and welfare.

For research involving employees, consumers, students, business owners, communities, or other potentially vulnerable groups, authors must demonstrate appropriate attention to informed consent, confidentiality, risk minimization, and participant protection.

Authors must also ensure that the collection and use of financial, organizational, commercial, and personal data comply with applicable legal and ethical requirements.

For studies that do not involve human participants or other activities requiring formal ethical approval, such approval may not be necessary. Nevertheless, all research remains subject to the principles of academic integrity, accurate representation of evidence, proper attribution, and respect for intellectual property.

Where ethical approval is not applicable, authors may be required to provide an appropriate statement explaining why formal ethical approval was not required.

7. Intellectual Property

JIEB respects intellectual property rights and requires all submitted manuscripts to comply with applicable copyright and intellectual property regulations.

Authors must ensure that manuscripts are original and that all ideas, arguments, quotations, data, images, figures, tables, and other materials derived from third parties are properly attributed and referenced.

Direct quotations must be clearly identified and accurately cited. Authors are responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce copyrighted materials where such permission is required.

Manuscripts submitted to JIEB must:

  1. Represent original scholarly work.

  2. Not have been previously published in substantially the same form, except where the journal's policies explicitly permit a properly disclosed form of prior dissemination.

  3. Not be simultaneously under consideration by another journal.

  4. Properly acknowledge all sources and intellectual contributions.

  5. Comply with the journal's plagiarism screening and publication ethics requirements.

JIEB publishes its content under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).

Under this license, users may share and adapt published material, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link to the license is provided, changes are indicated where applicable, and adapted material is distributed under the same license.

License details are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

The application of the CC BY-SA license does not remove or override copyright and permission requirements applicable to third-party materials included in an article.

Authors remain responsible for ensuring that their submissions do not infringe the intellectual property rights of other individuals, institutions, publishers, or copyright holders.

8. Post-Publication Discussions

JIEB recognizes that scholarly evaluation and discussion may continue after publication.

Readers, researchers, authors, and other members of the academic community are encouraged to communicate substantive concerns, comments, clarifications, or scholarly responses concerning published articles.

Post-publication comments or concerns should be evidence-based, academically relevant, professionally expressed, respectful, and focused on the content, methodology, interpretation, or integrity of the published work.

When a substantive concern is received, the editorial team will assess the matter and may contact the authors for clarification or response.

Where appropriate, JIEB may publish:

  • An author response.

  • A scholarly commentary.

  • A correction.

  • An editorial note.

  • An Expression of Concern.

  • A retraction notice.

The journal may consult independent experts when a matter requires additional scholarly or methodological assessment.

Post-publication discussion is intended to strengthen scholarly dialogue and ensure the continuing accuracy, reliability, and integrity of the academic record.

9. Corrections, Retractions, and Expressions of Concern

JIEB is committed to maintaining a reliable and transparent scholarly record. The journal distinguishes between corrections, retractions, and Expressions of Concern according to the nature and seriousness of the issue identified.

9.1. Corrections

A correction may be issued when an article contains an error or omission that affects the accuracy, clarity, or completeness of the published record but does not invalidate the central argument, methodology, or findings.

Corrections may concern:

  • Factual inaccuracies.

  • Author names or affiliations.

  • Methodological descriptions.

  • Figures or tables.

  • References or citations.

  • Typographical errors that materially affect meaning.

  • Other substantive inaccuracies.

Corrections will be clearly identified and, where technically possible, linked to the original article.

9.2. Retractions

JIEB may retract an article when clear and substantial evidence indicates that the reliability or integrity of the published work has been seriously compromised.

Reasons for retraction may include:

  • Fabricated or falsified data.

  • Serious plagiarism.

  • Substantial research misconduct.

  • Duplicate or redundant publication.

  • Major methodological or factual errors that invalidate the main conclusions.

  • Serious ethical violations.

  • Fraudulent authorship.

  • Manipulation of the peer-review or publication process.

  • Other circumstances that substantially undermine the reliability of the article.

A retraction notice will identify the article, state the reason for the retraction, and provide sufficient information to explain the action taken.

The original article will normally remain accessible as part of the scholarly record but will be clearly marked RETRACTED. The retraction notice will be permanently linked to the original publication where technically possible.

9.3. Expression of Concern

An Expression of Concern may be issued when the journal has a serious and credible concern regarding the integrity, reliability, or ethical status of a published article, but the available evidence is not yet sufficient to justify a correction or retraction.

An Expression of Concern may be issued while:

  • An institutional investigation is ongoing.

  • Relevant evidence is being assessed.

  • The authors or institution have not provided sufficient clarification.

  • The editorial team requires additional information before reaching a final decision.

The Expression of Concern will remain associated with the article until the matter has been resolved or further editorial action is determined to be appropriate.

10. Editorial Responsibility

The Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board of JIEB are responsible for implementing this Publication Ethics Policy and ensuring that ethical considerations are appropriately addressed throughout the editorial and publication process.

Editorial decisions should be based primarily on the scholarly quality, originality, methodological rigor, relevance, and contribution of the manuscript rather than the author's identity, institutional affiliation, nationality, gender, or other irrelevant personal characteristics.

JIEB applies a double-blind peer-review process to support an impartial evaluation of submitted manuscripts. Editors and reviewers are expected to maintain confidentiality, avoid conflicts of interest, provide objective scholarly assessments, and contribute to the integrity and quality of the publication process.

The journal's editorial team will periodically review this policy to reflect developments in publication ethics and responsible scholarly publishing.

JIEB is committed to continuous improvement in editorial governance and to maintaining a transparent, accountable, and ethically responsible publishing environment in the fields of economics and business.