A Review of Speech Act Theories Focusing on Searle (1969)

  • Veronica Saragi Applied Linguistics Center, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Sikin Nuratika Applied Linguistics Center, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Fransiska Fransiska Applied Linguistics Center, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Maya Yolanda Applied Linguistics Center, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Niki Ardiyanti Applied Linguistics Center, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
Keywords: Speech Act, Linguistics Theory, Philosopher, Social Life, Searle

Abstract

Before John Searle wrote the book of Speech Acts, he wrote an article about “What is a Speech Act?” (in Philosophy in America, Max Black, ed. (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1965), 221–239). He was born in Denver in 1932. He spent some seven years in Oxford, beginning as an undergraduate in the autumn of 1952 with a Rhodes Scholarship, and concluding as a Lecturer in Philosophy at Christ Church. He has spent almost all of his subsequent life as Professor of Philosophy in Berkeley according to Smith (2003). This article aims to review the speech act theories by Searle (1969) to know what the theories of speech acts according to him to aid researchers understand more on how to apply it in real social life. Moreover, this article’s references are accurate (valid) and they well argued. This article is highly recommended for the philosopher, specialists and analysts in the field of pragmatics, discourse analysis, sociolinguistics and conversational analysis, communication studies who have a significant part in this study. Therefore, this paper seen the speech act theories by Searle (1969) will be more effective if we know and understand more about the speech act theories by Searle (1969) to use it in real social life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2019-06-03
How to Cite
Saragi, V., Nuratika, S., Fransiska, F., Yolanda, M., & Ardiyanti, N. (2019). A Review of Speech Act Theories Focusing on Searle (1969) . Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies, 1(2), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v1i2.3529
Abstract viewed = 2778 times
PDF downloaded = 1398 times