The Six Characteristics of Andragogy and Future Research Directions in EFL: A Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v4i1.7473Keywords:
Andragogy, Adult Learning, Pedagogy, Theory of Learning, Literature ReviewAbstract
The way in which adults learn is distinctive to how children learn, hence Andragogy differs from Pedagogy and so do the implications. Although several studies have attempted to discuss the andragogy and its principles, only few studies investigate its implementation and the practical guidance on how to employ each characteristic in the teaching and learning process. To fill this void, this paper reviews the concept of andragogy and highlights its six characteristics: self-concept, experiences, readiness to learn, motivation, need to know, and problem-centred learning. Employing a narrative review of 18 journal articles from reputable international journals, the study’s findings suggest that the six characteristics/principles of andragogy are applicable in designing teaching and learning materials, teaching activities, and assignments enacted by teachers. Future research is encouraged to delve into the practice of the six characteristics of andragogy in the teaching of English as a foreign language. The differences between adults and children learning and directions for further research in teaching English as a Foreign Language (EFL) is also discussed at the end of study.
References
Abdullah, M., Chamid, N., & Khamim, K. (2021). Reorientation of the Andragogy Concept and Its Relevance to Higher Education in Indonesia for Answering the Global Era of Information: Critical Review of Malcolm Knowles Perspective. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Islamic Studies, Ponorogo, Indonesia. Retrieved from https://eudl.eu/doi/10.4108/eai.27-10-2020.2304160.
Aljohani, O. H., & Alajlan, S. M. (2021). The application of andragogy for the advanced diploma program in education at Saudi Arabia’s Taif university. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 17(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.20210701.oa1
Aragon, S. R. (Ed.). (2003). Facilitating learning in online environments. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Between Pedagogy vs. Andragogy. Point Park University.
Batubara, F., Derin , T., Putri, N. S., & Yudar , R. S. (2020). Five Factors Influencing the Students’ Motivation to Learn English as a Foreign Language: A Closer Look into Montessori Classroom Environment. REiLA : Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 2(2), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v2i2.3165
Bowling, J., & Henschke, J. A. (2020). Pedagogy and Andragogy Intersection of Learning. In Rocco, T S. , Smith, C. M, Mizzi, C.R, Merriweather, L.R, Hawley. J.D (Eds.), The handbook of adult and continuing education. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Cozma, M. (2015). The Challenge of Teaching English to Adult Learners in Today's World. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.380
Domysheva S. A., & Kopylova N. V. (2021). Overcoming non-linguistic barriers to effective speaking in Russian adult ESP classroom. History, Pedagogics, Philology, 27 (1), 87–94. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2021-27-1-87-94
Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429485893
Downing, J. J., & Dyment, J. E. (2013). Teacher educators' readiness, preparation, and perceptions of preparing preservice teachers in a fully online environment: An exploratory study. The Teacher Educator,48(2),96-109.Ferreira, D., & Maclean, G. (2018). Andragogy in the 21st century: Applying the assumptions of adult Learning Online. Language Research Bulletin, 32(September 2017), 10–19.
Gencel, I. E., & Saracaloglu, A. S. (2018). The effect of layered curriculum on reflective thinking and on self-directed learning readiness of prospective teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(1), 8-20.
Goodnight, R., & Zickel, T., & Owen, D. O. (1999). Understanding Andragogy: How Adults Learn. Paper presented at 1999 Annual Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina. https://peer.asee.org/8010
Hadi, M. S., & Izzah, L. (2018). Problem Based Learning (PBL) in teaching English for students of primary school teacher education department. English Language in Focus (ELIF), 1(1), 45-54.
Hägg, G., & Kurczewska, A. (2019). Who is the student entrepreneur? Understanding the emergent adult through the pedagogy and andragogy interplay [Special Issue]. Journal of Small Business Management, 57, 130-147.
Hall, H. E. (2021). The Lived Experiences of the Midlife Learner in Pursuit of Higher Education as It Relates to Andragogy and Self-Directed Learning Approaches (Publication No. 28319102) [Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Hariyadi, A., & Yanti, D.R. (2019). The importance of needs analysis in materials development. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 4(2), 94-99
Hiew, W., & Murray, J. (2021). Enhancing Huber’s evaluation framework for teacher professional development programme. Professional Development in Education (Online First), 1-15.
Hubers, M. D., D. Endedijk, M., & Van Veen, K. (2020). Effective characteristics of professional development programs for science and technology education. Professional Development in Education (Online First), 1-20.
Hughes, S. (2013). Quinn’s Principles and Practice of Nurse Education (6th Edition). UK: Cengage Learning.
Knowles, M. S. (1988). The adult learner: A neglected species. London: Gulf.
Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2005). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource devel¬opment (6th ed.). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2014). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Routledge.
Lavasani, M. G., & Faryadres, F. (2011). Language learning strategies and suggested model in adults processes of learning second language. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 191-197.
Licorish, S. A., Owen, H. E., Daniel, B., & George, J. L. (2018). Students’ perception of Kahoot!’s influence on teaching and learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1), 1-23.Loeng, S. (2018). Various ways of understanding the concept of andragogy. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1496643.
Loeng, S. (2020). Self-directed learning: A core concept in adult education. Education Research International (Online First), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3816132
Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2013). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R. S., & Baumgartner, L. M. Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide, (San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons/Jossey-Bass, 2007. Reflective Practice: Formation and Supervision in Ministry, 31.
Mews, J. (2020). Leading through andragogy. College and University, 95(1), 65-68.
Misch, D. A. (2002). Andragogy and medical education: Are medical students internally motivated to learn?. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 7(2), 153-160.
Nagara, Chanikarnda Komarakul Na. (2020). Pedandragogy: Promoting effective learning environments and self-efficacy in adult learners with andragogy and pedagogy (Publication No. 27829219) [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Note, N., De Backer, F., & Donder, L. D. (2021). A novel viewpoint on andragogy: Enabling moments of community. Adult Education Quarterly, 71(1), 3-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713620921361
Nur Aisyah, R., Istiqomah, D. M., & Muchlisin, M. (2021). Rising English Students’ Motivation in Online Learning Platform: Telegram Apps Support. Utamax : Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education, 3(2), 90-96. https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v3i2.6464
Nursafira, M. S. (2020). TED Talks in EFL Context: An Alternative Way for Teaching and Improving Student’s Speaking Skills. Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies, 2(2), 43-47. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v2i2.3968
O'Shea, S. (2016). Navigating the knowledge sets of older learners: Exploring the capitals of first-in-family mature age students. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 18(3), 34-54.
Paterson, S., & Stone, R. (2006). Educational leadership beyond behaviourism, the lessons we have learnt from art education. Australian Art Education, 29(1), 76-85.
Pitts, A. (2013). Learning from experience. Nursing Standard, 27(39).
Point Park University. (2016, April 22). Contrasting Classrooms: Instructional Differences
Purwanti, E. (2017). Understanding the EFL lecturers' beliefs about their professional learning from the lens of malcolm knowles theory of andragogy. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 30-43.
Purwati, D. (2019). EFL teachers’ challenges in teaching speaking in an Indonesian vocational high school. [Unpublished master's thesis]. The University of South Australia.
Purwati, D. (2020). Factors supporting and hindering the learning of English as an additional language experienced by a female Indonesian student. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 4(1), 94-101.
Putri, S., & Elihami, E. (2021). The concept andragogy and pedagogy: e-learning model during covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Edukas iNonformal, 2(1), 18-24.
Saiful, J. A., & Triyono, S. (2018). EFL teacher’s reflection in teaching English to EFL students of rural areas. International Journal of Language Education, 2(2), 1-13.
Sharifi, M., Soleimani, H., & Jafarigohar, M. (2017). E‐portfolio evaluation and vocabulary learning: Moving from pedagogy to andragogy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1441-1450.
Smith, S., Ewing, R., & Le, CR. (2015). Teaching: challenges & dilemmas, 5th ed. Cengage Learning Australia: South Melbourne, Victoria.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sumule, L. (2018). Implementing andragogy in Indonesian theological schools. Jurnal Jaffray, 16(1), 77-92.
Syamsuddin, S., & Jimi, A. A. (2018). Implementing the principles of andragogy in ELT to enhance the students’ English competence. EDUVELOP, 2(1), 57-63.
Tandon, K. (2016). Innovative andragogy: The paradigm shift to heutagogy. In Innovative Management Education Pedagogies for Preparing Next-Generation Leaders (pp. 238-257). IGI Global.
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J., & Pawson, R. (2013). RAMESES publication standards: Meta‐narrative reviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(5), 987-1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12092.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Author retains the copyright and grants Elsya Journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Elsya Journal is licensed under 