Improving Students’ Grammar Mastery of Noun Clauses By Using Teacher’s Correction Technique
Abstract
This study aims to know the improvement of students’ grammar mastery by using Teacher Correction technique. The research method used was a Classroom Action Research (CAR). The research data included the results of the pretest and posttest regarding noun clauses. The data collection techniques used were classroom observation, interviews, pretest and posttest. The results of this study showed that the average score of students was 24.6 in pretest, increased from to in Cycle I to 39.2 in 69.2 II. It indicated that the use of Teacher Correction technique could improve students' understanding in mastering noun clauses. This technique can be one of effective ways for teachers or lecturers to teach noun clauses.
Downloads
References
Amrhein, H. R. (2010). Written Corrective Feedback: What Do Students And Teachers Think Is Right And Why? Canadian Journal Of Applied Linguistics, 95-127.
Azar, B. (2003). Fundamentals of English Grammar. New York: Pearson Education.
Bal-Gezegin, B. A. (2003). 2. (Azar, 2003)Bal-GezeginCorpus Made My Job Easier”: Preservice Language Teachers’ Corrective Feedback Practices In Writing With Corpus Consultation. 2. (Azar, 2003)Bal-Gezegin, B., Akbaş, E., & Başal, A. (2023). “Corpus Made My Job Easier”: Preservice Language Teachers’ Technology For Writing Instruction , 279-285.
Bal-Gezegin, C. N. (2023). Design and Implementation of English Grammar Error Correction System Based on Deep Learning. In Application of Big Data, Blockchain, and Internet of Things for Education Informatization. EAI Internat, 445.
Dahler, D. (2017). The Effect of Using Content-Purpose-Audience (CPA) Strategy toward Students’ Writing of Analytical Exposition. ELT Lectura : Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(1).
Episiasi, E., Syaputri, W., Suramto, S., & Kasriyati, D. (2022). Lexical and Grammatical Cohesion in the Undergraduate Students’ Abstracts. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 5(2), 143-152.
Fauziah, D. N. (2023). Micro Learning for Undergraduate Students’ Writing Ability: An Effect on Writing English Text. . ELT Lectura : Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 236-248. .
Gong, J. (2023). Research on Interactive English Grammar Learning System Based on Android Platform. In Application of Big Data, Blockchain, and Internet of Things for Education Informatization. 1. Gong, J. (2023, January). Research on Interactive English Grammar Learning System Based on Android Plat EAI International Conference, BigIoT-EDU 2, 2.
Ha, X. V. (2023). Corrective Feedback: Beliefs And Practices Of Vietnamese Primary Efl Teachers. Language Teaching Research, 137-167.
Hernández Méndez, E. &. (2012). Teachers' Perceptions About Oral Corrective Feedback And Their Practice In Efl Classrooms. Teachers' Perceptions About Oral Corrective Feedback And Their Practice In Efl Classrooms. , 63-75.
Jiang, Y. S. (2023). Retracted Article: An IoT Technology for Development of Smart English Language Translation and Grammar Learning Applications. Jiang, Y., Sabitha, R., & Shankar, A. (2023). Retracted Article: An IoT Technology for DevelopmentArabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2601-2601.
Kasriyati, D., & Rosidah, A. (2020). A Study on Students’understanding on Applying Declarative Sentence. Jurnal Smart, 6(1), 1-9.
Lasagabaster, D. &. (2005)). Error Correction: Students’ Versus Teachers’ Perceptions. Language Awareness. Language Awareness, 112-117.
Maulidya, I. (2018). Grammar Peer Correction in Improving Student’ Writing Ability of Narrative Text. Banda Aceh.
Miles, M. B. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatis. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press. Jakarta.
Muliyah, P. R. (2020). Learning From Mistakes: Students’ Perception Towards Teacher’s Attitude In Writing Correction. Journal Of Linguistics And Applied Linguistics, 44-52.
Muñoz, C. P. (2023). Audio-visual input for learning L2 vocabulary and grammatical constructions. Second Language Research, 39(1), 13-37., 13-37.
N, B.-G. C. (2023). Error Correction And The Training Of Language Teachers. The Modern Language Journal, 414-422.
Roothooft, H. &. (Roothooft, 2016). A Comparison Of Efl Teachers’ And Students’ Attitudes To Oral Corrective Feedback. Language Awareness, 318-335.
Schmid, S. S. (2023). Finding hierarchical structure in binary sequences: evidence from Lindenmayer grammar learning. Cognitive Science, 13242.
Schulz, R. A. (1996). Focus On Form In The Foreign Language Classroom: Students' And Teachers' Views On Error Correction And The Role Of Grammar. Foreign Language Annals,, 343-364.
Suñer, 2. (2023). Riset Tindakan untuk Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widia Sarana Indonesia.
Suñer, F. R. (2023). Bodily engagement in the learning and teaching of grammar: On the effects of different embodied practices on the acquisition of German modal verbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics.
Yoshida, R. (2023). Teachers' Choice And Learners' Preference Of Corrective Feedback Types. Language Awareness, 78-93.
Copyright (c) 2023 Ari Satria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. License
Use of articles will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA)
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Halaman Olahraga Nusantara permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
3. The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
4. The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
