Challenging The Students by Using Video Movie to Improve Students’ Vocabulary on Independent Curriculum
Abstract
Based on Independent Curriculum in Indonesia, the goal of teaching learning at junior high school is that the students must be able to develop communicative competence in written as well as in spoken form. The use of video movie was chosen as video is an appropriate media to stimulate and motivate the students’ interest and attention in understanding the unknown words since video makes language more alive and meaningful and helps to bring the real worlds into classroom. This study is Classroom Action Research (CAR) study, means applied 2 cycles. The result shown, cycle 1, there were 18 students (54.54%) who gained score ≥ 55, while in cycle 2 there were 32 students (96 %) who gained score ≥ 60. For the learning process, that is, the students’ activities, there were only 23 students (66%) who did 80% of the activities in cycle 1, but there were 32 students (96%) who did 80% of the activities in cycle 2. Meanwhile, for the teacher’s performance, the teacher got score 62 in cycle 1, then she got 84 in cycle 2 which means that she could teach the students well after implementing the use of video movie.
Downloads
References
Aghajanzadeh Kiasi, G., & Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2023). The Effects of Definitional, Sentential, and Textual Vocabulary Learning Strategies on Iranian EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning and Retention. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 39(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2022.2073575
Alexiou, T. (2023). Vocabulary in the Foreign Language Curriculum: Principles for Effective Instruction. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 173–176.
Aravind, B. R., & Bhuvaneswari, G. (2023). Utilizing Blogs on ESL learners’ vocabulary learning through social constructivist theory: A descriptive study. MethodsX, 10, 101970.
Bristol III, J. E. (2007). Free Expression in Motion Pictures: Childhood Sexuality and a Satisfied Society. Cardozo Arts & Ent. LJ, 25, 333.
Cai, S., Liu, E., Shen, Y., Liu, C., Li, S., & Shen, Y. (2020). Probability learning in mathematics using augmented reality: Impact on student’s learning gains and attitudes. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(5), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1696839
Covarrubias, P. O., & Kirschbaum, K. A. (2017). Among cultures: The challenge of communication. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315621173/among-cultures-bradford-hall-patricia-covarrubias-kristin-kirschbaum
Drenoyianni, H., & Bekos, N. (2023). IT teachers’ beliefs about alternative curriculum designs: Results from a mixed methods study. The Curriculum Journal, 34(2), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.176
Fan, X., & Zhong, X. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based creative thinking skill analysis model using human–computer interaction in art design teaching. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 100, 107957.
Haryana, M. R. A., Warsono, S., Achjari, D., & Nahartyo, E. (2022). Virtual reality learning media with innovative learning materials to enhance individual learning outcomes based on cognitive load theory. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(3), 100657.
Holden, M. (2023). Exploring online lesson study as a vehicle for teacher collaborative professional learning. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 12(2), 179–193.
Homayouni, M. (2022). Peer assessment in group-oriented classroom contexts: On the effectiveness of peer assessment coupled with scaffolding and group work on speaking skills and vocabulary learning. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00211-3
Jiang, L., Yu, S., & Zhao, Y. (2022). Incorporating digital multimodal composing through collaborative action research: Challenges and coping strategies. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1978534
Jukes, S., Stewart, A., & Morse, M. (2023). Learning landscapes through technology and movement: Blurring boundaries for a more-than-human pedagogy. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2023.2166543
Leo, S. (2021). A challenging Book to practice Teaching in English. Penerbit Andi. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=Sy0TEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Some+teachers+at+Junior+High+School+tend+to+force+the+students+to+memorize+a+number+of+vocabularies+without+giving+them+a+chance+to+practice+and+use+them+in+real+life.&ots=xNcdYS0GVu&sig=SS-8QgEz3knevIuVjOchsvw0M3w
Lestari, D. A., & Sakti, B. (2020). Social vulnerability to earthquake hazard at Pringsewu District, Lampung Province. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 561(1), 012046.
Ling, N. S., & Abdul Aziz, A. (2022). The Effectiveness of Game-based Learning Strategies on Primary ESL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 845–860.
Mumford, S., & Dikilitaş, K. (2020). Pre-service language teachers reflection development through online interaction in a hybrid learning course. Computers & Education, 144, 103706.
Ng, D. T., Ng, E. H., & Chu, S. K. (2022). Engaging students in creative music making with musical instrument application in an online flipped classroom. Education and information Technologies, 27(1), 45–64.
Nushi, M., & Orouji, F. (2020). Investigating EFL Teachers’ Views on Listening Difficulties Among Their Learners: The Case of Iranian Context. SAGE Open, 10(2), 215824402091739. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020917393
Pawlak, M., Derakhshan, A., Mehdizadeh, M., & Kruk, M. (2021). Boredom in online English language classes: Mediating variables and coping strategies. Language Teaching Research, 136216882110649. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211064944
Perez, M. M. (2022). Second or foreign language learning through watching audio-visual input and the role of on-screen text. Language Teaching, 55(2), 163–192.
Roberts, S. (2022). The power of not thinking: How our bodies learn and why we should trust them. Rowman & Littlefield. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=_Q9sEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP8&dq=someone+learns+only+when+he+or+she+is+seeing,+hearing,+smelling,+feeling,+thinking,+and+do+physical+activities.+&ots=1jr-yx85dN&sig=aqueGYafbGiyibo-ogVv9NaLFKs
Rousse-Malpat, A., Steinkrauss, R., Wieling, M., & Verspoor, M. (2022). Communicative language teaching: Structure-Based or Dynamic Usage-Based? Journal of the European Second Language Association, 6(1). https://www.euroslajournal.org/articles/10.22599/jesla.86/print/
Saleem, M., Larik, A. R., & Bukhari, S. G. A. S. (2023). Loopholes in developing English communicative competence: A comparative case study of Pakistan and China. Research in Comparative and International Education, 18(3), 373–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999221128474
Syaputri, W., Septianasari, L., & Abqoriyyah, F. H. (2020). Tantangan Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berbicara Mahasiswa dengan Metode Pembelajaran Wawancara. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 6(1), 90–97.
Teng, M. F. (2023). The effectiveness of multimedia input on vocabulary learning and retention. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(3), 738–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2131791
Wallace, M. P. (2022). Individual Differences in Second Language Listening: Examining the Role of Knowledge, Metacognitive Awareness, Memory, and Attention. Language Learning, 72(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12424
Wallace, T., Stariha, W. E., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). Teaching speaking, listening and writing. International Academy of Education. http://www.iaoed.org/files/prac14e.pdf
Williams, R., Ali, S., Devasia, N., DiPaola, D., Hong, J., Kaputsos, S. P., Jordan, B., & Breazeal, C. (2023). AI + Ethics Curricula for Middle School Youth: Lessons Learned from Three Project-Based Curricula. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(2), 325–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00298-y
Zhai, X., C. Haudek, K., Shi, L., H. Nehm, R., & Urban‐Lurain, M. (2020). From substitution to redefinition: A framework of machine learning‐based science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(9), 1430–1459. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21658
Zhou, C., & Li, X. (2021). LextPT: A reliable and efficient vocabulary size test for L2 Portuguese proficiency. Behavior Research Methods, 54(6), 2625–2639. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01731-1
Copyright (c) 2024 Rani Amrista Wijayanti, Delta Rahwanda, Yudi Efendi, Wuri Syaputri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. License
Use of articles will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA)
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Halaman Olahraga Nusantara permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
3. The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
4. The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
