AI as Pedagogical Partner: ELT Teachers’ Strategies and Dilemmas in Everyday Classroom Use
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31849/wrs5az97Keywords:
Artificial intelligence (AI), English language teaching (ELT) , Teacher strategies, AI integration , Pedagogical challengesAbstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping English Language Teaching (ELT), yet what teachers actually do with AI in everyday classrooms is still poorly documented. Addressing this gap, this study examines how ELT teachers integrate AI as a pedagogical partner, the extent of its classroom use, and the dilemmas that accompany it. Using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, survey data were first collected from thirty secondary and tertiary ELT teachers who already used AI tools, followed by in depth interviews with five purposively selected participants to explain and deepen the survey patterns. Descriptive statistics show moderately high levels of AI engagement, with reported classroom use ranging from about 60 to 95 percent, most teachers rating AI effectiveness at 4 or 5 on a five point scale, and challenge ratings clustering at 3 or above, indicating that benefits and barriers are experienced simultaneously. Thematic analysis of interview data reveals that teachers employ AI for AI assisted peer review, chatbot supported speaking tasks, data informed lesson planning, and real time language feedback that together enhance student participation and instructional efficiency. At the same time, teachers struggle with unequal access to devices and connectivity, limited institutional training, ethical concerns about data use and academic integrity, and the risk of student over reliance on AI. The study contributes a grounded, teacher centred account of AI integration in ELT and calls for sustained professional development, equitable infrastructure, and clear institutional guidelines so that AI can support more ethical, inclusive, and human centred language education.
References
Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K–12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(3), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
Al-Khresheh, M. H. (2024a). Bridging technology and pedagogy from a global lens: Teachers’ perspectives on integrating ChatGPT in English language teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100218
Al-Khresheh, M. H. (2024b). The future of artificial intelligence in English language teaching: Pros and cons of ChatGPT implementation through a systematic review. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 43, 54–80. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.43.04
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). British Educational Research Association. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chang, W. L., & Sun, J. C. Y. (2024). Evaluating AI’s impact on self-regulated language learning: A systematic review. System, 126, Article 103484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103484
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Donald, S., & Andrew, E. (2023). Navigating ELT pragmatics in the digital era: A pedagogical exploration. Law Research Journal, 1(1), 45–69.
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs. Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Foltynek, T., Bjelobaba, S., Glendinning, I., Khan, Z. R., Santos, R., Pavletic, P., & Kravjar, J. (2023). ENAI recommendations on the ethical use of artificial intelligence in education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00133-4
Goffi, E. R. (2023). Teaching ethics applied to AI from a cultural standpoint: What African “AI ethics” for Africa? In C. C. Corrigan, S. A. Asakipaam, J. J. Kponyo, & C. Lü tge (Eds.), AI ethics in higher education: Insights from Africa and beyond (pp. 13–26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23035-6_2
Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692
Gyawali, Y. P., & Mehandroo, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence in English language teaching: Navigating the future with emerging perspectives. Journal of Language and Linguistics in Society, 2(6), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.55529/jlls.26.21.27
Hockly, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in English language teaching: The good, the bad and the ugly. RELC Journal, 54(2), 445–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231168504
Hwang, W.-Y., Luthfi, M. I., & Liu, Y.-F. (2024). AI-enhanced video drama-making for improving writing and speaking skills of students learning English as a foreign language. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2437655
Idham, A. Z., Rauf, W., & Rajab, A. (2024). Navigating the transformative impact of artificial intelligence on English language teaching: Exploring challenges and opportunities. Jurnal Edukasi Saintifik, 4(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.56185/jes.v4i1.620
Liando, N. V. F., & Tatipang, D. P. (2024). Enlightened minds: Navigating the nexus of artificial intelligence and educational modernization. CV Tahta Media Group.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Muthmainnah, M., Cardoso, L., Alsbbagh, Y. A. M. R., Al Yakin, A., & Apriani, E. (2024). Advancing sustainable learning by boosting student self-regulated learning and feedback through AI-driven personalized in EFL education. In Explainable artificial intelligence in the digital sustainability administration (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol. 1033, pp. 36–54). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63717-9_3
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B. P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
Novawan, A., Walker, S. A., & Ikeda, O. (2024). The new face of technology-enhanced language learning (TELL) with artificial intelligence (AI): Teacher perspectives, practices, and challenges. Journal of English in Academic and Professional Communication, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.25047/jeapco.v10i1.4565
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Xiao, K., & Hu, X. (2022). Artificial intelligence and learning analytics in teacher education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 12(8), 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080569
Setyaningsih, E., Asrori, M., Ngadiso, Sumardi, Zainnuri, H., & Hariyanti, Y. (2024). Exploring high school EFL teachers’ experiences with Magic School AI in lesson planning: Benefits and insights. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i3.27700
Tatipang, D. P., Pontillas, M. S., Alrajafi, G., Rovikasari, M., & Ndruru, F. (2024). The interplay among AI, language research, and academic publishing: A systematic review of trends and future directions. Journal of English Culture, Language, Literature and Education, 12(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.53682/eclue.v12i2.4602
Teng, M. F. (2024). A systematic review of ChatGPT for English as a foreign language writing: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 6(3), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20240304
Vaccino-Salvadore, S. (2023). Exploring the ethical dimensions of using ChatGPT in language learning and beyond. Languages, 8(3), 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030191
Wu, Z., Binti, H., Halim, A., Rashid, M., & Saad, B. M. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) and gamification in blended learning: Enhancing language and literacy in Shanxi, China. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(12), e003159. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v9i12.3159
Yunina, O. (2023). Artificial intelligence tools in foreign language teaching in higher education institutions. The Modern Higher Education Review, 8, 77–90. https://doi.org/10.28925/2617-5266.2023.85
Zaim, M., Arsyad, S., Waluyo, B., Ardi, H., Al Hafizh, M., Zakiyah, M., Syafitri, W., Nusi, A., & Hardiah, M. (2024). AI-powered EFL pedagogy: Integrating generative AI into university teaching preparation through UTAUT and activity theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100335
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







